Mapping wetland habitat health in moribund deltaic India using machine learning and deep learning algorithms

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
{"title":"Mapping wetland habitat health in moribund deltaic India using machine learning and deep learning algorithms","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecohyd.2024.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Researchers have increasingly integrated machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms to forecast the risk, vulnerability, and susceptibility of various geo-environmental challenges. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is a dearth of studies that have employed DL to predict the health status of wetland habitats, and none have explored a comparative analysis between ML and DL models in this context. This study aims to fill this gap by focusing on the development of wetland habitat health status using both ML and DL models, seeking to determine whether DL models exhibit superior predictability compared to ML models. The assessment of wetland habitat health status reveals that smaller fringe wetlands situated away from main rivers tend to be identified as poor habitats. The transition from phase II to III is marked by a substantial reduction in wetland area, decreasing from 438.76 km<sup>2</sup> to 235.68 km<sup>2</sup><span> across different habitat zones, underscoring the significant loss of wetland areas. The observed 43–46 % decline in very poor and poor habitat areas from phase II to III lends credibility to the predictive capabilities of the models. Notably, among the applied ML and DL models, XGB from the ML category and DNB from the DL category have demonstrated superior performance. In all instances, DL models outperformed ML models, suggesting that deep learning algorithms hold promise for evaluating wetland habitat health status. The mapping and modelling of wetland habitat health status at a spatial scale are pivotal for formulating effective wetland management<span> strategies. The identification of areas with poor and good habitat health provides valuable information for prioritized planning and targeted wetland restoration efforts.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":56070,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology","volume":"24 3","pages":"Pages 667-680"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1642359324000247","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers have increasingly integrated machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms to forecast the risk, vulnerability, and susceptibility of various geo-environmental challenges. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is a dearth of studies that have employed DL to predict the health status of wetland habitats, and none have explored a comparative analysis between ML and DL models in this context. This study aims to fill this gap by focusing on the development of wetland habitat health status using both ML and DL models, seeking to determine whether DL models exhibit superior predictability compared to ML models. The assessment of wetland habitat health status reveals that smaller fringe wetlands situated away from main rivers tend to be identified as poor habitats. The transition from phase II to III is marked by a substantial reduction in wetland area, decreasing from 438.76 km2 to 235.68 km2 across different habitat zones, underscoring the significant loss of wetland areas. The observed 43–46 % decline in very poor and poor habitat areas from phase II to III lends credibility to the predictive capabilities of the models. Notably, among the applied ML and DL models, XGB from the ML category and DNB from the DL category have demonstrated superior performance. In all instances, DL models outperformed ML models, suggesting that deep learning algorithms hold promise for evaluating wetland habitat health status. The mapping and modelling of wetland habitat health status at a spatial scale are pivotal for formulating effective wetland management strategies. The identification of areas with poor and good habitat health provides valuable information for prioritized planning and targeted wetland restoration efforts.

利用机器学习和深度学习算法绘制印度奄奄一息的三角洲湿地生境健康状况图
研究人员越来越多地将机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)算法结合起来,以预测各种地理环境挑战的风险、脆弱性和易感性。然而,据我们所知,采用深度学习来预测湿地生境健康状况的研究还很少,也没有任何研究探讨过在这种情况下如何对 ML 和深度学习模型进行比较分析。本研究旨在填补这一空白,重点关注使用 ML 和 DL 模型对湿地生境健康状况进行发展,以确定与 ML 模型相比,DL 模型是否表现出更优越的可预测性。对湿地生境健康状况的评估显示,远离主要河流的较小边缘湿地往往被认定为不良生境。从第二阶段过渡到第三阶段,湿地面积大幅减少,不同生境区的湿地面积从 438.76 千米减少到 235.68 千米,凸显了湿地面积的显著减少。从第二阶段到第三阶段,观察到极差和差生境面积减少了 43-46%,这使模型的预测能力更加可信。值得注意的是,在应用的 ML 和 DL 模型中,ML 类中的 XGB 和 DL 类中的 DNB 表现出了卓越的性能。在所有情况下,DL 模型的表现都优于 ML 模型,这表明深度学习算法在评估湿地生境健康状况方面大有可为。在空间尺度上绘制湿地生境健康状况图和建立湿地生境健康状况模型对于制定有效的湿地管理策略至关重要。确定栖息地健康状况较差和较好的区域可为优先规划和有针对性的湿地恢复工作提供有价值的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology
Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Aquatic Science
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology is an international journal that aims to advance ecohydrology as the study of the interplay between ecological and hydrological processes from molecular to river basin scales, and to promote its implementation as an integrative management tool to harmonize societal needs with biosphere potential.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信