{"title":"Environmental ethics and green practices in the manufacturing sector: The role of green innovation and environmental policy","authors":"Osarodion Ogiemwonyi, Bilal Eneizan","doi":"10.1111/1477-8947.12444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous studies have indicated that incorporating an environmental ethic (EE), green innovation (GI), and environmental policy (EnP) can enhance a company's sustainable performance, that is, environmental performance (EP) and economic performance (EcP) in the manufacturing industry. However, to encourage eco‐friendly production and processes, it is crucial to promote sustainable practices across different industries. Nevertheless, some researchers have overlooked the significance of these implementations. Integrating these practices into the manufacturing sector can be challenging. To address this issue, this study has developed an empirical model that assesses two pillars of sustainable performance in the Jordanian manufacturing industry. The study analyzes the direct correlation between a firm's EE, GI, and sustainable performance. It also examines whether GI plays a mediating role in the relationship between company EE and sustainable performance and if EnP moderates the relationship between GI and sustainable performance. The study collected data from 386 respondents belonging to various manufacturing industries in Jordan and analyzed it using SmartPLS. The research revealed that a manufacturing firm's EE is significantly boosted by GI, EP, and EcP. These findings suggest that companies with higher EE are more likely to innovate sustainably and perform better in terms of sustainability. In particular, the study found that GI plays a mediating role between a firm's EE and its sustainable performance. Furthermore, the impact of EnP on the relationship between GI and EP was mixed, showing a moderating effect on the former but not on EcP. The study provides valuable insights into the implementation of green practices in the manufacturing sector and discusses policy implications for manufacturers.","PeriodicalId":49777,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Forum","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12444","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Numerous studies have indicated that incorporating an environmental ethic (EE), green innovation (GI), and environmental policy (EnP) can enhance a company's sustainable performance, that is, environmental performance (EP) and economic performance (EcP) in the manufacturing industry. However, to encourage eco‐friendly production and processes, it is crucial to promote sustainable practices across different industries. Nevertheless, some researchers have overlooked the significance of these implementations. Integrating these practices into the manufacturing sector can be challenging. To address this issue, this study has developed an empirical model that assesses two pillars of sustainable performance in the Jordanian manufacturing industry. The study analyzes the direct correlation between a firm's EE, GI, and sustainable performance. It also examines whether GI plays a mediating role in the relationship between company EE and sustainable performance and if EnP moderates the relationship between GI and sustainable performance. The study collected data from 386 respondents belonging to various manufacturing industries in Jordan and analyzed it using SmartPLS. The research revealed that a manufacturing firm's EE is significantly boosted by GI, EP, and EcP. These findings suggest that companies with higher EE are more likely to innovate sustainably and perform better in terms of sustainability. In particular, the study found that GI plays a mediating role between a firm's EE and its sustainable performance. Furthermore, the impact of EnP on the relationship between GI and EP was mixed, showing a moderating effect on the former but not on EcP. The study provides valuable insights into the implementation of green practices in the manufacturing sector and discusses policy implications for manufacturers.
大量研究表明,在制造业中融入环境伦理(EE)、绿色创新(GI)和环境政策(EnP)可以提高企业的可持续绩效,即环境绩效(EP)和经济绩效(EcP)。然而,要鼓励生态友好型生产和工艺,在不同行业推广可持续实践至关重要。然而,一些研究人员忽视了这些实施的重要性。将这些实践融入制造业可能具有挑战性。为解决这一问题,本研究建立了一个实证模型,以评估约旦制造业可持续绩效的两大支柱。研究分析了企业的环境绩效、地理信息指标和可持续绩效之间的直接相关性。研究还探讨了 GI 是否在公司 EE 与可持续绩效之间发挥中介作用,以及 EnP 是否调节了 GI 与可持续绩效之间的关系。研究收集了来自约旦不同制造业的 386 名受访者的数据,并使用 SmartPLS 进行了分析。研究发现,制造企业的环境绩效会受到 GI、EP 和 EcP 的显著影响。这些研究结果表明,EE 越高的公司越有可能进行可持续创新,在可持续发展方面表现得更好。研究特别发现,GI 在企业 EE 与可持续绩效之间起到了中介作用。此外,EnP 对 GI 和 EP 之间关系的影响好坏参半,对前者有调节作用,但对 EcP 没有影响。这项研究为制造业实施绿色实践提供了宝贵的见解,并探讨了对制造商的政策影响。
期刊介绍:
Natural Resources Forum, a United Nations Sustainable Development Journal, focuses on international, multidisciplinary issues related to sustainable development, with an emphasis on developing countries. The journal seeks to address gaps in current knowledge and stimulate policy discussions on the most critical issues associated with the sustainable development agenda, by promoting research that integrates the social, economic, and environmental dimensions of sustainable development. Contributions that inform the global policy debate through pragmatic lessons learned from experience at the local, national, and global levels are encouraged.
The Journal considers articles written on all topics relevant to sustainable development. In addition, it dedicates series, issues and special sections to specific themes that are relevant to the current discussions of the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD). Articles must be based on original research and must be relevant to policy-making.
Criteria for selection of submitted articles include:
1) Relevance and importance of the topic discussed to sustainable development in general, both in terms of policy impacts and gaps in current knowledge being addressed by the article;
2) Treatment of the topic that incorporates social, economic and environmental aspects of sustainable development, rather than focusing purely on sectoral and/or technical aspects;
3) Articles must contain original applied material drawn from concrete projects, policy implementation, or literature reviews; purely theoretical papers are not entertained.