Ecosymbiotic Complementarity, an Old Theory Applicable in Today’s Ethnobiological Studies

IF 1.7 2区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Elisa Lotero-Velásquez, Andrea Martínez-Ballesté, Alejandro Casas, Ernesto Vicente Vega Peña
{"title":"Ecosymbiotic Complementarity, an Old Theory Applicable in Today’s Ethnobiological Studies","authors":"Elisa Lotero-Velásquez, Andrea Martínez-Ballesté, Alejandro Casas, Ernesto Vicente Vega Peña","doi":"10.1007/s12231-024-09599-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ethnobiology analyzes the interactions between people and their surrounding environments from various perspectives. Some studies have been criticized by social scientists, who argue that ethnobiologists have insufficiently considered the conflicts between the dominant economic and political model and rural communities’ lives, which are often idealized. However, several ethnobiological studies have increasingly considered these aspects, and important initiatives in this direction have emerged from interactions with other research fields and frameworks, such as sustainability science, political ecology, agroecology, and social-ecological systems. To address criticism on what has been considered ethnobiological utopianism, it is valuable to theorize, develop methodological tools, and construct explanatory models. From such perspective, this work aims to recover an old theory called ecosymbiotic complementarity, which we propose can strengthen analytical approaches in the social-ecological systems framework. We recover the original proposal of the ecosymbiotic complementarity theory, emphasizing the relationships between rural communities and economic and political variables. We consider that the ecosymbiotic complementarity theory can contribute to the contextualization of rural societies analyzed in ethnobiological research.</p>","PeriodicalId":11412,"journal":{"name":"Economic Botany","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-024-09599-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ethnobiology analyzes the interactions between people and their surrounding environments from various perspectives. Some studies have been criticized by social scientists, who argue that ethnobiologists have insufficiently considered the conflicts between the dominant economic and political model and rural communities’ lives, which are often idealized. However, several ethnobiological studies have increasingly considered these aspects, and important initiatives in this direction have emerged from interactions with other research fields and frameworks, such as sustainability science, political ecology, agroecology, and social-ecological systems. To address criticism on what has been considered ethnobiological utopianism, it is valuable to theorize, develop methodological tools, and construct explanatory models. From such perspective, this work aims to recover an old theory called ecosymbiotic complementarity, which we propose can strengthen analytical approaches in the social-ecological systems framework. We recover the original proposal of the ecosymbiotic complementarity theory, emphasizing the relationships between rural communities and economic and political variables. We consider that the ecosymbiotic complementarity theory can contribute to the contextualization of rural societies analyzed in ethnobiological research.

Abstract Image

生态共生互补--适用于当今民族生物学研究的古老理论
民族生物学从不同角度分析人与其周围环境之间的相互作用。一些研究受到了社会科学家的批评,他们认为民族生物学家没有充分考虑主流经济和政治模式与农村社区生活之间的冲突,而农村社区的生活往往被理想化了。然而,一些民族生物学研究已越来越多地考虑到这些方面,并且在与其他研究领域和框架(如可持续发展科学、政治生态学、农业生态学和社会生态系统)的互动中出现了这方面的重要举措。为了回应对民族生物学乌托邦主义的批评,有必要进行理论研究、开发方法工具和构建解释模型。从这一角度出发,本研究旨在恢复一种名为生态共生互补性的古老理论,我们认为该理论可以加强社会生态系统框架中的分析方法。我们恢复了生态共生互补理论的最初提议,强调农村社区与经济和政治变量之间的关系。我们认为,生态共生互补理论有助于在民族生物学研究中分析农村社会的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economic Botany
Economic Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Economic Botany is a quarterly journal published by The New York Botanical Garden for the Society for Economic Botany. Interdisciplinary in scope, Economic Botany bridges the gap between pure and applied botany by focusing on the uses of plants by people. The foremost publication of its kind in this field, Economic Botany documents the rich relationship between plants and people around the world, encompassing the past, present, and potential uses of plants. Each issue contains original research articles, review articles, book reviews, annotated bibliographies, and notes on economic plants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信