{"title":"The Moment the Mahāvīra Attained Omniscience","authors":"Herman Tieken","doi":"10.1163/15728536-06701003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the accounts of the Mahāvīra’s life in the first <em>suyakkhaṃdha</em> of the <em>Āyāra(ṃga)</em> and the <em>Jinacaritra</em> several turning points are mentioned. As will be shown, the periods between these turning points are delimited in a highly exact way, which accounts for the intercalary months. However, the modern translators have failed to recognize the terms involved. And so have the authors of the texts themselves and the subsequent copyists, which in the case of <em>Āyāra</em> <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">I</span> becomes clear from an interpolation and in that of the <em>Jinacaritra</em> from the introduction of an alternative system of dating the main events in the Mahāvīra’s life. The latter system is also found in the second <em>suyakkhaṃdha</em> of the <em>Āyāra</em>, which contains an account of the Mahāvīra’s life which, as will be shown, might well have been based on the one in the <em>Jinacaritra</em>. The exact calculations lend the biography in <em>Āyāra</em> <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">I</span> the character of a handbook providing strict rules for prospective monks. The author of the <em>Jinacaritra</em>, who was unaware of the function of the calculations, produced instead a veritable hagiography. It will be argued that while the phenomenon of intercalarity must have been widely known, knowledge of the calculations seems to have been passed on mainly in royal administrative circles involved in taxation and revenue collection. This is a world from which the ascetic monks, however learned, must have been far removed. This might explain the misunderstandings visible in the <em>Jinacaritra</em> and, with it, <em>Āyāra</em> <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">II</span>. The authors of what is by general agreement the earliest version, in <em>Āyāra</em> <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">I</span>, seem instead to have been familiar with the work carried out in these administrative centres.</p>","PeriodicalId":43180,"journal":{"name":"INDO-IRANIAN JOURNAL","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INDO-IRANIAN JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15728536-06701003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the accounts of the Mahāvīra’s life in the first suyakkhaṃdha of the Āyāra(ṃga) and the Jinacaritra several turning points are mentioned. As will be shown, the periods between these turning points are delimited in a highly exact way, which accounts for the intercalary months. However, the modern translators have failed to recognize the terms involved. And so have the authors of the texts themselves and the subsequent copyists, which in the case of ĀyāraI becomes clear from an interpolation and in that of the Jinacaritra from the introduction of an alternative system of dating the main events in the Mahāvīra’s life. The latter system is also found in the second suyakkhaṃdha of the Āyāra, which contains an account of the Mahāvīra’s life which, as will be shown, might well have been based on the one in the Jinacaritra. The exact calculations lend the biography in ĀyāraI the character of a handbook providing strict rules for prospective monks. The author of the Jinacaritra, who was unaware of the function of the calculations, produced instead a veritable hagiography. It will be argued that while the phenomenon of intercalarity must have been widely known, knowledge of the calculations seems to have been passed on mainly in royal administrative circles involved in taxation and revenue collection. This is a world from which the ascetic monks, however learned, must have been far removed. This might explain the misunderstandings visible in the Jinacaritra and, with it, ĀyāraII. The authors of what is by general agreement the earliest version, in ĀyāraI, seem instead to have been familiar with the work carried out in these administrative centres.
期刊介绍:
Indo-Iranian Journal, founded in 1957, focuses on the ancient and medieval languages and cultures of South Asia and of pre-islamic Iran. It publishes articles on Indo-Iranian languages (linguistics and literatures), such as Sanskrit, Avestan, Middle Iranian and Middle & New Indo-Aryan. It publishes specialized research on ancient Iranian religion and the Indian religions, such as the Veda, Hinduism, Jainism and Buddhism (including Tibetan). The journal welcomes epigraphical studies as well as general contributions to the understanding of the (pre-modern) history and culture of South Asia. Illustrations are accepted. A substantial part of Indo-Iranian Journal is reserved for reviews of new research.