Soil moisture and hydrological processes dynamics under climate and land use changes in a semiarid experimental basin, Brazil

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
{"title":"Soil moisture and hydrological processes dynamics under climate and land use changes in a semiarid experimental basin, Brazil","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecohyd.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Water resources </span>sustainability<span> is an increasing concern, requiring accurate estimates of the hydrological processes involved. This study evaluates the impacts of climate change (CC) and land use (LU) in a river basin in the Brazilian semi-arid. Using the Soil &amp; Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), calibration/ validation was carried out based on limited measurements for discharge and using complementary </span></span>remote sensing<span> information for evapotranspiration<span> (ET), as well as experimental data for soil moisture (SM). The evapotranspiration data used for calibration were obtained from the MOD16A2 product, at sub-basin scale. Principal component analysis was used to evaluate the interaction between variables. To assess the impacts of CC e and LU two scenarios were investigated: S1 – LU map without insertion of Permanent Preservation Areas (PPA), and S2 – with insertion of PPA. The Regional Climate Models (RCM) Eta-MIROC5 and Eta-HADGEM-ES for the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios were adopted. The SWAT model adequately represented evapotranspiration, with Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (NS) of 0.67 for calibration, and 0.74 for validation. For wet periods, the SM simulated values were similar to the experimental measurements with a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.68. Complementary information for evapotranspiration and soil moisture across sub-basins successfully allowed consistent spatially distributed hydrological variables to be simulated. The model performance for validation using ET data was higher (NS = 0.77) compared to previous streamflow-only calibration strategies for flow (NS = 0.42) and soil moisture (NS = 0.46). Under the CC scenarios, natural </span></span></span>vegetation restoration would compensate reductions in water availability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56070,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S164235932400020X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water resources sustainability is an increasing concern, requiring accurate estimates of the hydrological processes involved. This study evaluates the impacts of climate change (CC) and land use (LU) in a river basin in the Brazilian semi-arid. Using the Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), calibration/ validation was carried out based on limited measurements for discharge and using complementary remote sensing information for evapotranspiration (ET), as well as experimental data for soil moisture (SM). The evapotranspiration data used for calibration were obtained from the MOD16A2 product, at sub-basin scale. Principal component analysis was used to evaluate the interaction between variables. To assess the impacts of CC e and LU two scenarios were investigated: S1 – LU map without insertion of Permanent Preservation Areas (PPA), and S2 – with insertion of PPA. The Regional Climate Models (RCM) Eta-MIROC5 and Eta-HADGEM-ES for the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios were adopted. The SWAT model adequately represented evapotranspiration, with Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (NS) of 0.67 for calibration, and 0.74 for validation. For wet periods, the SM simulated values were similar to the experimental measurements with a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.68. Complementary information for evapotranspiration and soil moisture across sub-basins successfully allowed consistent spatially distributed hydrological variables to be simulated. The model performance for validation using ET data was higher (NS = 0.77) compared to previous streamflow-only calibration strategies for flow (NS = 0.42) and soil moisture (NS = 0.46). Under the CC scenarios, natural vegetation restoration would compensate reductions in water availability.

巴西一个半干旱实验盆地在气候和土地利用变化下的土壤水分和水文过程动态变化
水资源的可持续发展日益受到关注,这就要求对相关的水文过程进行准确的估算。本研究评估了气候变化(CC)和土地利用(LU)对巴西半干旱流域的影响。利用水土评估工具 (SWAT),根据有限的排水量测量数据、蒸散量 (ET) 的补充遥感信息以及土壤湿度 (SM) 的实验数据进行了校准/验证。用于校准的蒸散量数据来自 MOD16A2 产品的子流域尺度数据。主成分分析用于评估变量之间的相互作用。为了评估 CC e 和 LU 的影响,研究了两种方案:S1 - 没有插入永久保护区(PPA)的土地利用图,S2 - 有插入永久保护区的土地利用图。采用了 Eta-MIROC5 和 Eta-HADGEM-ES 代表性浓度途径 (RCP) 4.5 和 8.5 方案的区域气候模型 (RCM)。SWAT 模型充分反映了蒸散作用,校准的纳什-萨特克利夫系数 (NS) 为 0.67,验证的纳什-萨特克利夫系数 (NS) 为 0.74。在潮湿时期,SM 模拟值与实验测量值相似,确定系数 (R²) 为 0.68。各子流域的蒸散和土壤水分信息互补,成功地模拟了一致的空间分布水文变量。使用蒸散发数据进行验证的模型性能(NS = 0.77)高于之前仅对流量(NS = 0.42)和土壤湿度(NS = 0.46)进行校准的方法。在 CC 情景下,自然植被恢复将弥补水供应的减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology
Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Aquatic Science
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology is an international journal that aims to advance ecohydrology as the study of the interplay between ecological and hydrological processes from molecular to river basin scales, and to promote its implementation as an integrative management tool to harmonize societal needs with biosphere potential.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信