Jae Sang Han, Dong-Hee Lee, Shi Nae Park, Kyoung Ho Park, Tae Ho Kim, Jae Hong Han, Min Ju Kang, So-Hyun Kim, Jae-Hyun Seo
{"title":"Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the upright head roll test for lateral semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo","authors":"Jae Sang Han, Dong-Hee Lee, Shi Nae Park, Kyoung Ho Park, Tae Ho Kim, Jae Hong Han, Min Ju Kang, So-Hyun Kim, Jae-Hyun Seo","doi":"10.3233/ves-230127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The upright head roll test (UHRT) is a recently introduced diagnostic maneuver for lateral semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (LSC-BPPV). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the UHRT. METHODS: Two separate studies were conducted.Study 1 analyzed 827 results of videonystagmography (VNG) to assess UHRT reliability, and Study 2 analyzed 130 LSC-BPPV cases to evaluate UHRT validity. RESULTS: The inter-test reliability between UHRT and the supine head roll test (SHRT) showed substantial agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.753) in direction-changing positional nystagmus (DCPN) and almost perfect agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.836) in distinguishing the direction of DCPN. The validity assessment of UHRT showed high accuracy in diagnosing LSC-BPPV (80.0% ) and in differentiating the variant types (74.6% ). UHRT was highly accurate in diagnosing the canalolithiasis type in LSC-BPPV patients (Cohen’s kappa = 0.835); however, it showed only moderate accuracy in diagnosing the cupulolithiasis type (Cohen’s kappa = 0.415). The intensity of nystagmus in UHRT was relatively weaker than that in SHRT (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: UHRT is a reliable test for diagnosing LSC-BPPV and distinguishing subtypes. However, UHRT has a limitation in discriminating the affected side owing to a weaker intensity of nystagmus than SHRT.","PeriodicalId":516316,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vestibular Research","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vestibular Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ves-230127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The upright head roll test (UHRT) is a recently introduced diagnostic maneuver for lateral semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (LSC-BPPV). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the UHRT. METHODS: Two separate studies were conducted.Study 1 analyzed 827 results of videonystagmography (VNG) to assess UHRT reliability, and Study 2 analyzed 130 LSC-BPPV cases to evaluate UHRT validity. RESULTS: The inter-test reliability between UHRT and the supine head roll test (SHRT) showed substantial agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.753) in direction-changing positional nystagmus (DCPN) and almost perfect agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.836) in distinguishing the direction of DCPN. The validity assessment of UHRT showed high accuracy in diagnosing LSC-BPPV (80.0% ) and in differentiating the variant types (74.6% ). UHRT was highly accurate in diagnosing the canalolithiasis type in LSC-BPPV patients (Cohen’s kappa = 0.835); however, it showed only moderate accuracy in diagnosing the cupulolithiasis type (Cohen’s kappa = 0.415). The intensity of nystagmus in UHRT was relatively weaker than that in SHRT (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: UHRT is a reliable test for diagnosing LSC-BPPV and distinguishing subtypes. However, UHRT has a limitation in discriminating the affected side owing to a weaker intensity of nystagmus than SHRT.