Torvald's Question: Italo Svevo and James Joyce Stage Modern Masculinity

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER
Christine Froula
{"title":"Torvald's Question: Italo Svevo and James Joyce Stage Modern Masculinity","authors":"Christine Froula","doi":"10.1353/cdr.2024.a920793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Torvald's Question:<span>Italo Svevo and James Joyce Stage Modern Masculinity</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Christine Froula (bio) </li> </ul> <blockquote> <p>Nora! Nora! … Empty. She's gone. <em>(A sudden hope leaps in him.)</em> The greatest miracle—?!</p> Torvald in Henrik Ibsen, <em>A Doll House</em> (1879) </blockquote> <blockquote> <p>I have peeped into a great many doll's houses; and I have found that the dolls are not all female.</p> Nora in George Bernard Shaw, \"Still After the Doll's House\" (1890) </blockquote> <blockquote> <p><em>The Doll's House</em> … has caused the greatest revolution in our time in the most important relationship there is—that between men and women. … Ibsen has been the greatest influence on the present generation. … His ideas have become part of our lives.</p> James Joyce to Arthur Power, <em>Conversations with Joyce</em> (1920s) </blockquote> <p>When Nora Helmer departs Torvald's doll house to educate herself as an adult human being, she leaves behind a paragon of nineteenth-century masculine \"honor\" whose questions as to what he must do, how he must change, she cannot answer.<sup>1</sup> Whereas most commentary on <em>A Doll House</em> assumes that Ibsen leaves Torvald no escape,<sup>2</sup> this essay highlights Torvald's echo of Nora's word \"miracle\" in his hopeful question at the play's open end and argues that two of Ibsen's heirs— the Triestine writer Italo Svevo (1861–1928) and his English tutor and literary soulmate the Irish James Joyce (1882–1941)—pursue Torvald's question in plays that stage crises of modern masculinity in parallel with Nora's awakening. Read comparatively, Ibsen's <em>A Doll House</em> (1879), <strong>[End Page 229]</strong> Svevo's <em>A Husband</em> (1895/1903), and Joyce's <em>Exiles</em> (1913–1915) embody a dramatic dialogue on freeing all the characters—Torvalds and Noras alike—from an antiquated socio-economic sex/gender system. Taking Ibsen's critical-realist dramaturgy into daring new territory, Svevo and Joyce stage avant-garde psychodramas in social worlds that put traditional masculinity—formed by man-made laws, rights, values, freedom, conscious and unconscious assumptions, prerogatives, and motives—in tension with Ibsen's revolutionary modernity. Their diagnostic dramas of toxic-masculinity-with-a-good-prognosis distill from Torvald's question a Shavian quintessence of post-Ibsenism that illuminates Ibsen's subsumption of feminism within the dialectical vision of human possibility that Nora's departure opens.</p> <h2>Ibsen's Pharmakon: \"the greatest miracle—?!\"</h2> <p>The shock waves sent through Europe and the world by the 1879 Copenhagen premiere of Ibsen's <em>A Doll House</em> (<em>Et Dukkehjem</em>) reverberate in innumerable debates and interpretations, from the play's first reviews to its 2023 Broadway adaptation.<sup>3</sup> In \"Ibsen's first fully modernist play,\" Nora catches the light as an enduring touchstone for women's struggles to claim full humanity in the private and public realms.<sup>4</sup> Yet she exists with \"other people in the great dolls' house of the social world,\" where all the characters interact in \"painful change, creative accommodation, or apathetic resignation.\"<sup>5</sup> In the 1890 story \"Still After the Doll's House\" by Ibsen's great champion George Bernard Shaw (who \"turned playwright in order to carry on Ibsen's work\"),<sup>6</sup> a future Nora observes that \"it is not always the woman who is sacrificed\"; \"I have peeped into a great many doll's houses; and I have found that the dolls are not all female.\"<sup>7</sup> Shaw lauded Courtenay Thorpe's 1897 Torvald, played with unprecedented \"passion\" to \"overwhelming\" effect as no longer \"an object lesson in lord-of-creationism\" but a \"fellow-creature blindly wrecking his happiness.\"<sup>8</sup> The next year, addressing the Norwegian Association for the Cause of Women, Ibsen resisted the reduction of his play's world to one character or one sex. More \"poet\" than \"social philosopher,\" he felt he \"must decline the honor consciously to have worked for the cause of women. I am not even quite clear what the cause of women really is. For me it has appeared <strong>[End Page 230]</strong> to be the cause of human beings. … My task has been to <em>portray human beings</em>.\"<sup>9</sup></p> <p>The play's long reception and Nora's many eponymous adaptations<sup>10</sup> tend to obscure the fact that Torvald speaks last: \"Nora! Nora! … Empty. She's gone. <em>(A sudden hope leaps in him.)</em> The greatest miracle...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":39600,"journal":{"name":"COMPARATIVE DRAMA","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMPARATIVE DRAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cdr.2024.a920793","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Torvald's Question:Italo Svevo and James Joyce Stage Modern Masculinity
  • Christine Froula (bio)

Nora! Nora! … Empty. She's gone. (A sudden hope leaps in him.) The greatest miracle—?!

Torvald in Henrik Ibsen, A Doll House (1879)

I have peeped into a great many doll's houses; and I have found that the dolls are not all female.

Nora in George Bernard Shaw, "Still After the Doll's House" (1890)

The Doll's House … has caused the greatest revolution in our time in the most important relationship there is—that between men and women. … Ibsen has been the greatest influence on the present generation. … His ideas have become part of our lives.

James Joyce to Arthur Power, Conversations with Joyce (1920s)

When Nora Helmer departs Torvald's doll house to educate herself as an adult human being, she leaves behind a paragon of nineteenth-century masculine "honor" whose questions as to what he must do, how he must change, she cannot answer.1 Whereas most commentary on A Doll House assumes that Ibsen leaves Torvald no escape,2 this essay highlights Torvald's echo of Nora's word "miracle" in his hopeful question at the play's open end and argues that two of Ibsen's heirs— the Triestine writer Italo Svevo (1861–1928) and his English tutor and literary soulmate the Irish James Joyce (1882–1941)—pursue Torvald's question in plays that stage crises of modern masculinity in parallel with Nora's awakening. Read comparatively, Ibsen's A Doll House (1879), [End Page 229] Svevo's A Husband (1895/1903), and Joyce's Exiles (1913–1915) embody a dramatic dialogue on freeing all the characters—Torvalds and Noras alike—from an antiquated socio-economic sex/gender system. Taking Ibsen's critical-realist dramaturgy into daring new territory, Svevo and Joyce stage avant-garde psychodramas in social worlds that put traditional masculinity—formed by man-made laws, rights, values, freedom, conscious and unconscious assumptions, prerogatives, and motives—in tension with Ibsen's revolutionary modernity. Their diagnostic dramas of toxic-masculinity-with-a-good-prognosis distill from Torvald's question a Shavian quintessence of post-Ibsenism that illuminates Ibsen's subsumption of feminism within the dialectical vision of human possibility that Nora's departure opens.

Ibsen's Pharmakon: "the greatest miracle—?!"

The shock waves sent through Europe and the world by the 1879 Copenhagen premiere of Ibsen's A Doll House (Et Dukkehjem) reverberate in innumerable debates and interpretations, from the play's first reviews to its 2023 Broadway adaptation.3 In "Ibsen's first fully modernist play," Nora catches the light as an enduring touchstone for women's struggles to claim full humanity in the private and public realms.4 Yet she exists with "other people in the great dolls' house of the social world," where all the characters interact in "painful change, creative accommodation, or apathetic resignation."5 In the 1890 story "Still After the Doll's House" by Ibsen's great champion George Bernard Shaw (who "turned playwright in order to carry on Ibsen's work"),6 a future Nora observes that "it is not always the woman who is sacrificed"; "I have peeped into a great many doll's houses; and I have found that the dolls are not all female."7 Shaw lauded Courtenay Thorpe's 1897 Torvald, played with unprecedented "passion" to "overwhelming" effect as no longer "an object lesson in lord-of-creationism" but a "fellow-creature blindly wrecking his happiness."8 The next year, addressing the Norwegian Association for the Cause of Women, Ibsen resisted the reduction of his play's world to one character or one sex. More "poet" than "social philosopher," he felt he "must decline the honor consciously to have worked for the cause of women. I am not even quite clear what the cause of women really is. For me it has appeared [End Page 230] to be the cause of human beings. … My task has been to portray human beings."9

The play's long reception and Nora's many eponymous adaptations10 tend to obscure the fact that Torvald speaks last: "Nora! Nora! … Empty. She's gone. (A sudden hope leaps in him.) The greatest miracle...

托瓦尔德的问题:伊塔洛-斯维沃和詹姆斯-乔伊斯的现代男性气质
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 托瓦尔德的问题:伊塔洛-斯维沃和詹姆斯-乔伊斯的现代男性气质》 克里斯蒂娜-弗劳拉(简历) 诺拉!诺拉......空空如也。她走了(他突然燃起了希望)最伟大的奇迹--.....!亨利克-易卜生《玩偶之家》(1879 年)中的托瓦尔德 我窥视过许多玩偶之家,我发现玩偶并不都是女性。萧伯纳《玩偶之家》(1890 年)中的诺拉 《玩偶之家》......引发了我们这个时代最重要的关系--男女关系--的最大变革。... 易卜生对当代人的影响最大。... 他的思想已经成为我们生活的一部分。詹姆斯-乔伊斯致阿瑟-鲍尔,《与乔伊斯的对话》(1920 年代) 当诺拉-海尔默离开托瓦尔德的玩偶之家,去接受成人教育时,她留下了一个十九世纪男性 "荣誉 "的典范,她无法回答他必须做什么、必须如何改变的问题1。大多数关于《玩偶之家》的评论都认为易卜生让托瓦尔德无路可逃、2 这篇文章强调了托瓦尔德在剧终充满希望的提问中对诺拉所说的 "奇迹 "一词的呼应,并认为易卜生的两位继承人-- Triestine作家伊塔洛-斯维沃(Italo Svevo,1861-1928年)和他的英国导师兼文学知音爱尔兰人詹姆斯-乔伊斯(James Joyce,1882-1941年)--在剧中追问托瓦尔德的问题,在诺拉觉醒的同时也上演了现代男性的危机。相对而言,易卜生的《玩偶之家》(1879 年)、斯韦沃的《一个丈夫》(1895/1903 年)和乔伊斯的《流放者》(1913-1915 年)体现了一种戏剧性对话,旨在将所有人物--托瓦尔德和诺拉--从陈旧的社会经济性别体系中解放出来。斯维沃和乔伊斯将易卜生的批判现实主义戏剧创作带入了一个大胆的新领域,在社会世界中上演前卫的心理剧,将由人为法律、权利、价值观、自由、有意识和无意识的假设、特权和动机所形成的传统男性气质与易卜生的革命现代性对立起来。他们的 "有毒的男性气质--良好的预后 "诊断剧,从托瓦尔德的问题中提炼出了后易卜生主义的沙维雅精髓,阐明了易卜生将女权主义归入了诺拉的离去所开启的人类可能性的辩证视野之中。易卜生的《药神》:"最伟大的奇迹--?1879 年易卜生的《玩偶之家》(Et Dukkehjem)在哥本哈根首演,在欧洲和世界掀起了轩然大波,从该剧的首批评论到 2023 年的百老汇改编,无数的争论和阐释都在回荡。然而,她与 "社会世界的大玩偶屋中的其他人 "共同存在,剧中所有人物都在 "痛苦的改变、创造性的迁就或冷漠的顺从 "中互动。"5 在易卜生的伟大拥护者萧伯纳(他 "为了继承易卜生的作品而成为剧作家")1890 年创作的故事《玩偶之家》6 中,未来的诺拉注意到 "被牺牲的并不总是女人";"我窥视过许多玩偶之家;我发现玩偶并不都是女性"。"7 肖称赞库尔特内-索普(Courtenay Thorpe)在 1897 年演出的《托瓦尔德》(Torvald),该剧以前所未有的 "激情 "达到了 "压倒性 "的效果,不再是 "创造主 义的一堂课",而是 "盲目破坏自己幸福的同类"。与其说他是 "社会哲学家",不如说他是 "诗人",他认为自己 "必须有意识地拒绝为妇女事业工作的荣誉。我甚至不太清楚妇女事业到底是什么。对我来说,它似乎 [第 230 页完] 是人类的事业。......我的任务一直是描绘人类。"9 该剧的长期流传和《诺拉》的多次同名改编10 往往掩盖了托瓦尔德最后发言的事实:"诺拉!诺拉......空空如也。她走了。(他突然燃起了希望)最伟大的奇迹......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
COMPARATIVE DRAMA
COMPARATIVE DRAMA Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Comparative Drama (ISSN 0010-4078) is a scholarly journal devoted to studies international in spirit and interdisciplinary in scope; it is published quarterly (Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter) at Western Michigan University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信