Art Acts: Reframing the White Gaze in Claudia Rankine's The White Card

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER
Carla J. McDonough
{"title":"Art Acts: Reframing the White Gaze in Claudia Rankine's The White Card","authors":"Carla J. McDonough","doi":"10.1353/cdr.2024.a920787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Art Acts:<span>Reframing the White Gaze in Claudia Rankine's <em>The White Card</em></span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Carla J. McDonough (bio) </li> </ul> <blockquote> <p>\"Until we are willing to look at the ways in which white Americans are culpable in the suffering of the people of color, and understand that culpability needs to be present in the representation of that, suffering will continue.\"</p> Claudia Rankine<sup>1</sup> </blockquote> <blockquote> <p>\"Art has always been the tool of the powerful, and also the weapon of the dispossessed: official imagery controls narratives of identity and defines what is 'right', but these representations can be creatively subverted and destroyed. You have to know the rules of the space to sabotage it.\"</p> Alice Procter<sup>2</sup> </blockquote> <p>Protest arose at the Whitney Museum's 2017 Biennial exhibit in response to Dana Schutz's painting <em>Open Casket</em>, a somewhat abstract rendering of the famous photograph of Emmett Till in his casket. Artist Parker Bright's critique led him to stand in front of the painting wearing a tee-shirt that read \"Black Death Spectacle.\" Bright's physical protest was followed by an open letter written by Hannah Black that demanded the Whitney remove the painting, in which she wrote:</p> <blockquote> <p>Although Schutz's intention may be to present white shame, this shame is not correctly represented as a painting of a dead Black boy by a white artist—those non-Black artists who sincerely wish to highlight the shameful nature of white violence should first of all stop treating Black pain as raw material. The subject matter is not Schutz's; white free speech and white creative freedom have been founded on the constraints of others, and are not natural rights. The painting must go.<sup>3</sup></p> </blockquote> <p><strong>[End Page 87]</strong></p> <p>Some artists and patrons responded to this protest by arguing the dangers of censorship, while many others supported removal of the painting. The controversy led to hot debates in the art-world and culminated in the Whitney's decision to stage a public discussion about race and representation within the traditionally \"white\" spaces of museums. The museum asked Claudia Rankine to moderate this discussion due to her work in founding the Racial Imaginary Institute, an inter-disciplinary \"cultural laboratory\" that explores, counters, contextualizes and demystifies cultural ideas about race.<sup>4</sup> The Whitney billed the evening as a discussion about \"questions around race, violence, the ethics of representation, and the limits of empathy.\"<sup>5</sup> Although the curators of the museum did not alter the exhibit in response to the protests, the debates about representation in visual, literary, filmic and theatrical arts continues as American culture grapples with legacies of colonialism, appropriation, and white dominance. Claudia Rankine's 2018 play <em>The White Card</em> immerses its characters and audience in these debates and is most fully understood in this context to be refocusing not on Black experience but on the blindness about whiteness that is a traditional part of the white gaze.<sup>6</sup></p> <p>These protests at the Whitney serve as representative of a broader cultural reckoning over racial representation, including the 2020 We See You White American Theatre (We See You WAT) movement in theatre. BIPOC writers of the open letter to White American Theatre repeat that \"we see you\" ignoring stories by and about people of color, and overlooking POC for hiring in all levels of the theatre (acting, directing, designing, etc.), while using them to acquire grants and funding.<sup>7</sup> This letter, cosigned by some 300 signatories calling for action within the theatre world, led to widespread responses from theatres and theatre groups, prompting theatres to quickly post statements about Diversity, Equity and Inclusion on their websites and stage more works written, directed, and produced by people of color. Both the We See You WAT movement, and the 2017 Whitney Biennial event reflect an on-going art-world conundrum: how to change the power structure that has privileged \"white spaces\" that whites have the privilege of not seeing as such, spaces that have either omitted the work, experience, and talent of artists of color, or problematically appropriated them. The first step toward creating change is to acknowledge how the status quo has been maintained through white blindness. <strong>[End Page 88]</strong></p> <p>White blindness, which ironically is part of the white gaze, is...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":39600,"journal":{"name":"COMPARATIVE DRAMA","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMPARATIVE DRAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cdr.2024.a920787","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Art Acts:Reframing the White Gaze in Claudia Rankine's The White Card
  • Carla J. McDonough (bio)

"Until we are willing to look at the ways in which white Americans are culpable in the suffering of the people of color, and understand that culpability needs to be present in the representation of that, suffering will continue."

Claudia Rankine1

"Art has always been the tool of the powerful, and also the weapon of the dispossessed: official imagery controls narratives of identity and defines what is 'right', but these representations can be creatively subverted and destroyed. You have to know the rules of the space to sabotage it."

Alice Procter2

Protest arose at the Whitney Museum's 2017 Biennial exhibit in response to Dana Schutz's painting Open Casket, a somewhat abstract rendering of the famous photograph of Emmett Till in his casket. Artist Parker Bright's critique led him to stand in front of the painting wearing a tee-shirt that read "Black Death Spectacle." Bright's physical protest was followed by an open letter written by Hannah Black that demanded the Whitney remove the painting, in which she wrote:

Although Schutz's intention may be to present white shame, this shame is not correctly represented as a painting of a dead Black boy by a white artist—those non-Black artists who sincerely wish to highlight the shameful nature of white violence should first of all stop treating Black pain as raw material. The subject matter is not Schutz's; white free speech and white creative freedom have been founded on the constraints of others, and are not natural rights. The painting must go.3

[End Page 87]

Some artists and patrons responded to this protest by arguing the dangers of censorship, while many others supported removal of the painting. The controversy led to hot debates in the art-world and culminated in the Whitney's decision to stage a public discussion about race and representation within the traditionally "white" spaces of museums. The museum asked Claudia Rankine to moderate this discussion due to her work in founding the Racial Imaginary Institute, an inter-disciplinary "cultural laboratory" that explores, counters, contextualizes and demystifies cultural ideas about race.4 The Whitney billed the evening as a discussion about "questions around race, violence, the ethics of representation, and the limits of empathy."5 Although the curators of the museum did not alter the exhibit in response to the protests, the debates about representation in visual, literary, filmic and theatrical arts continues as American culture grapples with legacies of colonialism, appropriation, and white dominance. Claudia Rankine's 2018 play The White Card immerses its characters and audience in these debates and is most fully understood in this context to be refocusing not on Black experience but on the blindness about whiteness that is a traditional part of the white gaze.6

These protests at the Whitney serve as representative of a broader cultural reckoning over racial representation, including the 2020 We See You White American Theatre (We See You WAT) movement in theatre. BIPOC writers of the open letter to White American Theatre repeat that "we see you" ignoring stories by and about people of color, and overlooking POC for hiring in all levels of the theatre (acting, directing, designing, etc.), while using them to acquire grants and funding.7 This letter, cosigned by some 300 signatories calling for action within the theatre world, led to widespread responses from theatres and theatre groups, prompting theatres to quickly post statements about Diversity, Equity and Inclusion on their websites and stage more works written, directed, and produced by people of color. Both the We See You WAT movement, and the 2017 Whitney Biennial event reflect an on-going art-world conundrum: how to change the power structure that has privileged "white spaces" that whites have the privilege of not seeing as such, spaces that have either omitted the work, experience, and talent of artists of color, or problematically appropriated them. The first step toward creating change is to acknowledge how the status quo has been maintained through white blindness. [End Page 88]

White blindness, which ironically is part of the white gaze, is...

艺术行为:在克劳迪娅-兰金的《白卡》中重塑白人的目光
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 艺术行为:重构克劳迪娅-兰金《白卡》中的白人凝视 Carla J. McDonough(简历) "除非我们愿意正视美国白人在有色人种的苦难中应承担的罪责,并理解这种罪责需要存在于对苦难的表述中,否则苦难仍将继续。"克劳迪娅-兰金1 "艺术一直是强者的工具,也是被剥夺者的武器:官方图像控制着身份叙事,定义着什么是'正确的',但这些表述可以被创造性地颠覆和摧毁。你必须了解空间的规则,才能破坏它"。爱丽丝-普罗克特(Alice Procter)2 在惠特尼博物馆 2017 年的双年展上,针对丹娜-舒兹(Dana Schutz)的画作《打开的棺材》(Open Casket)提出了抗议,该画作以抽象的方式呈现了艾米特-提尔(Emmett Till)躺在棺材里的著名照片。艺术家帕克-布莱特(Parker Bright)的批评导致他穿着一件写有 "黑色死亡奇观"(Black Death Spectacle)的 T 恤站在画作前。在布莱特的身体抗议之后,汉娜-布莱克(Hannah Black)写了一封公开信,要求惠特尼撤下这幅画: 尽管舒兹的意图可能是展现白人的羞耻,但这种羞耻并不能正确地表现为白人艺术家画了一个死去的黑人男孩--那些真诚希望突出白人暴力的可耻本质的非黑人艺术家首先应该停止把黑人的痛苦当作原材料。这幅画的主题不是舒兹的;白人的言论自由和创作自由建立在他人的限制之上,并不是天赋权利。3 [第 87 页完] 一些艺术家和赞助人对这一抗议做出了回应,他们认为审查制度是危险的,而其他许多人则支持删除这幅画。这场争议引发了艺术界的激烈争论,最终惠特尼决定在传统上属于 "白人 "的博物馆空间内举办一场关于种族和代表性的公开讨论会。博物馆邀请克劳迪娅-兰金(Claudia Rankine)主持这场讨论,因为她曾创建种族想象研究所(Racial Imaginary Institute),这是一个跨学科的 "文化实验室",旨在探索、反驳、梳理和揭示有关种族的文化观念。惠特尼博物馆将此次晚会称为一次关于 "种族、暴力、再现伦理和移情极限 "的讨论。5 尽管博物馆的策展人并未因抗议而改变展览内容,但随着美国文化努力应对殖民主义、挪用和白人统治的遗留问题,关于视觉、文学、电影和戏剧艺术中的再现问题的争论仍在继续。克劳迪娅-兰金(Claudia Rankine)2018 年创作的戏剧《白卡》(The White Card)让剧中人物和观众都沉浸在这些争论中,在这种背景下,最充分的理解是,该剧重新关注的不是黑人的经历,而是作为白人目光传统组成部分的对白人的盲目性。致美国白人剧院的公开信中的黑人、印地安人和其他有色人种作者反复强调,"我们看到你们 "忽视了有色人种的故事,在剧院的各个层面(表演、导演、设计等)的招聘中忽视了有色人种,却利用他们来获取拨款和资金。7 这封信由大约 300 名签名者共同签署,呼吁剧院界采取行动,引起了剧院和剧团的广泛响应,促使剧院迅速在其网站上发布关于多样性、平等和包容的声明,并上演更多由有色人种编剧、导演和制作的作品。无论是 "我们看见你 "运动,还是2017年惠特尼双年展活动,都反映了艺术界一个持续存在的难题:如何改变权力结构,让白人拥有特权的 "白色空间 "不被白人视为 "白色空间",这些空间要么忽略了有色人种艺术家的作品、经验和才华,要么对其进行了有问题的挪用。要想做出改变,第一步就是要承认白人的盲目性是如何维持现状的。[第88页完] 具有讽刺意味的是,白人视而不见是白人凝视的一部分,是......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
COMPARATIVE DRAMA
COMPARATIVE DRAMA Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Comparative Drama (ISSN 0010-4078) is a scholarly journal devoted to studies international in spirit and interdisciplinary in scope; it is published quarterly (Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter) at Western Michigan University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信