Is mouse dynamics information credible for user behavior research? An empirical investigation

IF 4.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Eduard Kuric , Peter Demcak , Matus Krajcovic , Peter Nemcek
{"title":"Is mouse dynamics information credible for user behavior research? An empirical investigation","authors":"Eduard Kuric ,&nbsp;Peter Demcak ,&nbsp;Matus Krajcovic ,&nbsp;Peter Nemcek","doi":"10.1016/j.csi.2024.103849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mouse dynamics, information on user’s interaction with a computer mouse, are in vogue in machine learning for purposes such as recommendations, personalization, prediction of user characteristics and behavioral biometrics. We point out a blind spot in current works involving mouse dynamics that originates in underestimating the gravity of the characteristics of the mouse device and configuration on the data that mouse dynamics are inferred from. In a controlled study with <span><math><mrow><mi>N</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>32</mn></mrow></math></span> participants, across three kinds of mouse interaction activities, we collect data for mouse dynamics utilizing a variety of mouse parameter configurations. We show that mouse dynamics commonly used in studies can be significantly altered by differences in mouse parameters. Out of 108 evaluated mouse dynamics metrics, 95 and 84 are affected between two conducted studies. A machine learning model’s performance can be warped by the mouse parameters being used. We demonstrate on a prediction task that mouse parameters cannot be approached uniformly and without consideration. We discuss methodological implications — how mouse dynamics studies should account for the diversity of mouse-related conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50635,"journal":{"name":"Computer Standards & Interfaces","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 103849"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920548924000187/pdfft?md5=22261c4aa60a750f67561046e5e7ba1b&pid=1-s2.0-S0920548924000187-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Standards & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920548924000187","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mouse dynamics, information on user’s interaction with a computer mouse, are in vogue in machine learning for purposes such as recommendations, personalization, prediction of user characteristics and behavioral biometrics. We point out a blind spot in current works involving mouse dynamics that originates in underestimating the gravity of the characteristics of the mouse device and configuration on the data that mouse dynamics are inferred from. In a controlled study with N=32 participants, across three kinds of mouse interaction activities, we collect data for mouse dynamics utilizing a variety of mouse parameter configurations. We show that mouse dynamics commonly used in studies can be significantly altered by differences in mouse parameters. Out of 108 evaluated mouse dynamics metrics, 95 and 84 are affected between two conducted studies. A machine learning model’s performance can be warped by the mouse parameters being used. We demonstrate on a prediction task that mouse parameters cannot be approached uniformly and without consideration. We discuss methodological implications — how mouse dynamics studies should account for the diversity of mouse-related conditions.

用户行为研究中的鼠标动态信息可信吗?实证调查
鼠标动态是用户与电脑鼠标交互的信息,在机器学习中非常流行,用于推荐、个性化、预测用户特征和行为生物识别等目的。我们指出了目前涉及鼠标动态的研究中存在的一个盲点,即低估了鼠标设备和配置特征对鼠标动态推断数据的影响。在一项有 32 名参与者参加的对照研究中,我们通过三种鼠标交互活动,收集了使用各种鼠标参数配置的鼠标动态数据。我们的研究表明,研究中常用的小鼠动态会因小鼠参数的不同而发生显著变化。在 108 个受评估的鼠标动态指标中,分别有 95 和 84 个指标在两项研究中受到影响。机器学习模型的性能也会受到所用小鼠参数的影响。我们在一项预测任务中证明,小鼠参数不能一概而论,也不能不加考虑。我们讨论了方法论的意义--小鼠动力学研究应如何考虑与小鼠相关的条件的多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Standards & Interfaces
Computer Standards & Interfaces 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The quality of software, well-defined interfaces (hardware and software), the process of digitalisation, and accepted standards in these fields are essential for building and exploiting complex computing, communication, multimedia and measuring systems. Standards can simplify the design and construction of individual hardware and software components and help to ensure satisfactory interworking. Computer Standards & Interfaces is an international journal dealing specifically with these topics. The journal • Provides information about activities and progress on the definition of computer standards, software quality, interfaces and methods, at national, European and international levels • Publishes critical comments on standards and standards activities • Disseminates user''s experiences and case studies in the application and exploitation of established or emerging standards, interfaces and methods • Offers a forum for discussion on actual projects, standards, interfaces and methods by recognised experts • Stimulates relevant research by providing a specialised refereed medium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信