The COVID-19 ambulance response assessment (CARA) study: a national survey of ambulance service healthcare professionals' preparedness and response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Jack William Barrett, Kate Bennett Eastley, Anthony Herbland, Peter Owen, Salman Naeem, Craig Mortimer, James King, Theresa Foster, Nigel Rees, Andy Rosser, Sarah Black, Fiona Bell, Rachael Fothergill, Adam Mellett-Smith, Michelle Jackson, Graham McClelland, Paul Gowens, Robert Spaight, Sandra Igbodo, Martina Brown, Julia Williams
{"title":"The COVID-19 ambulance response assessment (CARA) study: a national survey of ambulance service healthcare professionals' preparedness and response to the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Jack William Barrett, Kate Bennett Eastley, Anthony Herbland, Peter Owen, Salman Naeem, Craig Mortimer, James King, Theresa Foster, Nigel Rees, Andy Rosser, Sarah Black, Fiona Bell, Rachael Fothergill, Adam Mellett-Smith, Michelle Jackson, Graham McClelland, Paul Gowens, Robert Spaight, Sandra Igbodo, Martina Brown, Julia Williams","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2024.3.8.4.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic placed significant demand on the NHS, including ambulance services, but it is unclear how this affected ambulance service staff and paramedics in other clinical settings (e.g. urgent and primary care, armed services, prisons). This study aimed to measure the self-perceived preparedness and impact of the first wave of the pandemic on paramedics' psychological stress and perceived ability to deliver care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ambulance clinicians and paramedics working in other healthcare settings were invited to participate in a three-phase sequential online survey during the acceleration (April 2020), peak (May 2020) and deceleration (September/October 2020) phases of the first wave of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom. Recruitment used social media, Trust internal bulletins and the College of Paramedics' communication channels, employing a convenience sampling strategy. Data were collected using purposively developed open- and closed-ended questions and the validated general health questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12). Data were analysed using multi-level linear and logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Phase 1 recruited 3717 participants, reducing to 2709 (73%) by phase 2 and 2159 (58%) by phase 3. Participants were mostly male (58%, n = 2148) and registered paramedics (n = 1992, 54%). Mean (standard deviation) GHQ-12 scores were 16.5 (5.2) during phase 1, reducing to 15.2 (6.7) by phase 3. A total of 84% of participants (n = 3112) had a GHQ-12 score ≥ 12 during the first phase, indicating psychological distress. Participants that had higher GHQ-12 scores were feeling unprepared for the pandemic, and reported a lack of confidence in using personal protective equipment and managing cardiac arrests in confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most participants reported psychological distress, the reasons for which are multi-factorial. Ambulance managers need to be aware of the risks to staff mental health and take action to mitigate these, to support staff in the delivery of unscheduled, emergency and urgent care under these additional pressures.</p>","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":"8 4","pages":"10-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10910287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British paramedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2024.3.8.4.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic placed significant demand on the NHS, including ambulance services, but it is unclear how this affected ambulance service staff and paramedics in other clinical settings (e.g. urgent and primary care, armed services, prisons). This study aimed to measure the self-perceived preparedness and impact of the first wave of the pandemic on paramedics' psychological stress and perceived ability to deliver care.

Methods: Ambulance clinicians and paramedics working in other healthcare settings were invited to participate in a three-phase sequential online survey during the acceleration (April 2020), peak (May 2020) and deceleration (September/October 2020) phases of the first wave of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom. Recruitment used social media, Trust internal bulletins and the College of Paramedics' communication channels, employing a convenience sampling strategy. Data were collected using purposively developed open- and closed-ended questions and the validated general health questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12). Data were analysed using multi-level linear and logistic regression models.

Results: Phase 1 recruited 3717 participants, reducing to 2709 (73%) by phase 2 and 2159 (58%) by phase 3. Participants were mostly male (58%, n = 2148) and registered paramedics (n = 1992, 54%). Mean (standard deviation) GHQ-12 scores were 16.5 (5.2) during phase 1, reducing to 15.2 (6.7) by phase 3. A total of 84% of participants (n = 3112) had a GHQ-12 score ≥ 12 during the first phase, indicating psychological distress. Participants that had higher GHQ-12 scores were feeling unprepared for the pandemic, and reported a lack of confidence in using personal protective equipment and managing cardiac arrests in confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients.

Conclusions: Most participants reported psychological distress, the reasons for which are multi-factorial. Ambulance managers need to be aware of the risks to staff mental health and take action to mitigate these, to support staff in the delivery of unscheduled, emergency and urgent care under these additional pressures.

COVID-19 救护车响应评估 (CARA) 研究:对救护车服务医疗保健专业人员对 COVID-19 大流行病的准备和响应情况进行的全国性调查。
背景:COVID-19大流行对包括救护服务在内的英国国家医疗服务系统(NHS)造成了巨大需求,但目前尚不清楚这对救护服务人员和其他临床环境(如紧急医疗和初级医疗、武装服务、监狱)中的护理人员有何影响。本研究旨在测量护理人员自我感觉的准备情况以及第一波大流行对护理人员心理压力和提供护理能力的影响:方法:在英国 COVID-19 第一波疫情的加速(2020 年 4 月)、高峰(2020 年 5 月)和减速(2020 年 9 月/10 月)阶段,邀请救护车临床医生和在其他医疗机构工作的辅助医务人员参加三阶段顺序在线调查。采用便利抽样策略,通过社交媒体、信托公司内部公告和辅助医务人员学院的沟通渠道进行招募。采用有目的性的开放式和封闭式问题以及经过验证的一般健康问卷-12(GHQ-12)收集数据。数据分析采用多级线性和逻辑回归模型:第一阶段招募了 3717 名参与者,第二阶段减少到 2709 人(73%),第三阶段减少到 2159 人(58%)。参与者大多为男性(58%,n = 2148)和注册护理人员(n = 1992,54%)。第一阶段的 GHQ-12 平均分(标准差)为 16.5(5.2)分,第三阶段降至 15.2(6.7)分。在第一阶段,共有 84% 的参与者(n = 3112)的 GHQ-12 分数≥ 12,这表明他们存在心理困扰。GHQ-12得分较高的参与者对大流行感到毫无准备,并表示对使用个人防护设备和处理确诊或疑似COVID-19患者的心脏骤停缺乏信心:结论:大多数参与者都有心理困扰,其原因是多方面的。救护车管理人员需要意识到员工心理健康所面临的风险,并采取行动减轻这些风险,以支持员工在这些额外压力下提供计划外、紧急和紧急护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信