Saving ambulance resources: a service evaluation of the identification of non-viable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in London by advanced paramedic practitioners in critical care.

Nick Brown, Chelsey Pike
{"title":"Saving ambulance resources: a service evaluation of the identification of non-viable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in London by advanced paramedic practitioners in critical care.","authors":"Nick Brown, Chelsey Pike","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2024.3.8.4.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advanced paramedic practitioners in critical care (APPCCs) are advanced clinical practitioners focused on the delivery of pre-hospital critical care. While working in an ambulance control room setting, APPCCs seek to identify emergency calls appropriate for operational APPCCs to attend. These would include out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Through interrogation of incoming emergency calls they are also able to identify OHCA calls where resuscitation may be futile. In these cases, and within a governance framework, they stand down multiple ambulance responders, leaving only the closest responding resource to attend, thereby 'saving resources' that can be re-directed to other waiting emergency calls. It is believed that this is the first initiative of this nature in the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-year retrospective service evaluation of data was undertaken. The aim was to quantify the number of 'saved resources', including both double crewed ambulances (DCAs) and solo (single-person) responders, and furthermore to equate those savings into potential hours saved, using average known job cycle times (JCTs). Additionally, safety was assessed by searching all mandated incident reports for occasions where, despite cancellation of resources by an APPCC, resuscitation was commenced by the first response to scene.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13,356 ambulance resources were saved. Of these, 6593 (49.4%) were DCAs and 6763 (50.6%) were solo responders. Using the average JCT for deceased patients of 104.8 minutes, the total time saving equated to 23,328.48 hours of work or 1944.04 12-hour shifts. When considering DCAs alone, the average JCT for obviously deceased patients was 110.9 minutes. This equates to 12,186.1 hours of work or 1015.5 12-hour shifts. A total of 15 incident reports were identified. All had been investigated, revealing appropriate decision making in cancelling ambulance resources. No patient harm was identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>APPCCs working within a governance framework safely saved a significant number of ambulance resources over a three-year period. Perceived benefits include 'freeing up' DCA and solo responders, allowing them to be redirected to other emergency calls, leading to potential improvement in response times for patients waiting for an ambulance resource.</p>","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":"8 4","pages":"38-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10910289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British paramedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2024.3.8.4.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advanced paramedic practitioners in critical care (APPCCs) are advanced clinical practitioners focused on the delivery of pre-hospital critical care. While working in an ambulance control room setting, APPCCs seek to identify emergency calls appropriate for operational APPCCs to attend. These would include out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Through interrogation of incoming emergency calls they are also able to identify OHCA calls where resuscitation may be futile. In these cases, and within a governance framework, they stand down multiple ambulance responders, leaving only the closest responding resource to attend, thereby 'saving resources' that can be re-directed to other waiting emergency calls. It is believed that this is the first initiative of this nature in the United Kingdom.

Methods: A three-year retrospective service evaluation of data was undertaken. The aim was to quantify the number of 'saved resources', including both double crewed ambulances (DCAs) and solo (single-person) responders, and furthermore to equate those savings into potential hours saved, using average known job cycle times (JCTs). Additionally, safety was assessed by searching all mandated incident reports for occasions where, despite cancellation of resources by an APPCC, resuscitation was commenced by the first response to scene.

Results: A total of 13,356 ambulance resources were saved. Of these, 6593 (49.4%) were DCAs and 6763 (50.6%) were solo responders. Using the average JCT for deceased patients of 104.8 minutes, the total time saving equated to 23,328.48 hours of work or 1944.04 12-hour shifts. When considering DCAs alone, the average JCT for obviously deceased patients was 110.9 minutes. This equates to 12,186.1 hours of work or 1015.5 12-hour shifts. A total of 15 incident reports were identified. All had been investigated, revealing appropriate decision making in cancelling ambulance resources. No patient harm was identified.

Conclusion: APPCCs working within a governance framework safely saved a significant number of ambulance resources over a three-year period. Perceived benefits include 'freeing up' DCA and solo responders, allowing them to be redirected to other emergency calls, leading to potential improvement in response times for patients waiting for an ambulance resource.

节约救护车资源:对伦敦重症监护高级辅助医务人员识别院外心脏骤停无生命迹象的服务进行评估。
背景:重症监护高级辅助医务人员(APPCCs)是专注于提供院前重症监护的高级临床从业人员。APPCC 在救护车控制室工作时,负责识别适合 APPCC 操作的紧急呼叫。其中包括院外心脏骤停(OHCA)。通过对接到的急救电话进行询问,他们还能识别出复苏可能无效的院外心脏骤停电话。在这种情况下,在管理框架内,他们会让多名救护车响应者停机,只留下最近的响应资源进行处理,从而 "节省 "资源,将其转用于其他等待的急救呼叫。据信,这是英国首个此类举措:方法:对数据进行了为期三年的回顾性服务评估。目的是量化 "节省的资源 "数量,包括双组救护车(DCA)和单人(单人)急救人员,并利用已知的平均工作周期时间(JCT)将节省的资源等同于潜在的节省时间。此外,还通过搜索所有法定事故报告来评估安全性,以了解在 APPCC 取消资源的情况下,第一时间赶到现场的急救人员是否开始了复苏:结果:共挽救了 13356 次救护车资源。其中,6593 人(占 49.4%)为 DCA,6763 人(占 50.6%)为单独响应者。以死亡病人的平均 JCT 为 104.8 分钟计算,节省的总时间相当于 23328.48 个工作小时或 1944.04 个 12 小时轮班。如果仅考虑 DCA,显然已死亡病人的平均 JCT 为 110.9 分钟。这相当于 12,186.1 个工作小时或 1015.5 个 12 小时轮班。共发现 15 份事故报告。所有报告都经过了调查,表明在取消救护车资源方面做出了适当的决策。没有发现对患者造成伤害的情况:在管理框架内开展工作的APPCC在三年内安全地节省了大量救护车资源。人们认为这样做的好处包括 "释放 "了 DCA 和单人救护人员,使他们能够转而处理其他紧急呼叫,从而有可能缩短病人等待救护车资源的响应时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信