Using Social Media as a Source of Real-World Data for Pharmaceutical Drug Development and Regulatory Decision Making.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Drug Safety Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1007/s40264-024-01409-5
Didrik Wessel, Nicolai Pogrebnyakov
{"title":"Using Social Media as a Source of Real-World Data for Pharmaceutical Drug Development and Regulatory Decision Making.","authors":"Didrik Wessel, Nicolai Pogrebnyakov","doi":"10.1007/s40264-024-01409-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While pharmaceutical companies aim to leverage real-world data (RWD) to bridge the gap between clinical drug development and real-world patient outcomes, extant research has mainly focused on the use of social media in a post-approval safety-surveillance setting. Recent regulatory and technological developments indicate that social media may serve as a rich source to expand the evidence base to pre-approval and drug development activities. However, use cases related to drug development have been largely omitted, thereby missing some of the benefits of RWD. In addition, an applied end-to-end understanding of RWD rooted in both industry and regulations is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to investigate how social media can be used as a source of RWD to support regulatory decision making and drug development in the pharmaceutical industry. We aimed to specifically explore the data pipeline and examine how social-media derived RWD can align with regulatory guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration and industry needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A machine learning pipeline was developed to extract patient insights related to anticoagulants from X (Twitter) data. These findings were then analysed from an industry perspective, and complemented by interviews with professionals from a pharmaceutical company.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis reveals several use cases where RWD derived from social media can be beneficial, particularly in generating hypotheses around patient and therapeutic area needs. We also note certain limitations of social media data, particularly around inferring causality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social media display considerable potential as a source of RWD for guiding efforts in pharmaceutical drug development and pre-approval settings. Although further regulatory guidance on the use of social media for RWD is needed to encourage its use, regulatory and technological developments are suggested to warrant at least exploratory uses for drug development.</p>","PeriodicalId":11382,"journal":{"name":"Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"495-511"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11018692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-024-01409-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: While pharmaceutical companies aim to leverage real-world data (RWD) to bridge the gap between clinical drug development and real-world patient outcomes, extant research has mainly focused on the use of social media in a post-approval safety-surveillance setting. Recent regulatory and technological developments indicate that social media may serve as a rich source to expand the evidence base to pre-approval and drug development activities. However, use cases related to drug development have been largely omitted, thereby missing some of the benefits of RWD. In addition, an applied end-to-end understanding of RWD rooted in both industry and regulations is lacking.

Objective: We aimed to investigate how social media can be used as a source of RWD to support regulatory decision making and drug development in the pharmaceutical industry. We aimed to specifically explore the data pipeline and examine how social-media derived RWD can align with regulatory guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration and industry needs.

Methods: A machine learning pipeline was developed to extract patient insights related to anticoagulants from X (Twitter) data. These findings were then analysed from an industry perspective, and complemented by interviews with professionals from a pharmaceutical company.

Results: The analysis reveals several use cases where RWD derived from social media can be beneficial, particularly in generating hypotheses around patient and therapeutic area needs. We also note certain limitations of social media data, particularly around inferring causality.

Conclusions: Social media display considerable potential as a source of RWD for guiding efforts in pharmaceutical drug development and pre-approval settings. Although further regulatory guidance on the use of social media for RWD is needed to encourage its use, regulatory and technological developments are suggested to warrant at least exploratory uses for drug development.

将社交媒体作为药物开发和监管决策的真实世界数据来源。
导言:制药公司旨在利用真实世界数据(RWD)弥合临床药物开发与真实世界患者结果之间的差距,而现有研究主要集中于在批准后安全监控环境中使用社交媒体。最近的监管和技术发展表明,社交媒体可以作为一个丰富的来源,将证据基础扩展到批准前和药物开发活动中。然而,与药物开发相关的用例在很大程度上被忽略了,从而错失了 RWD 的一些益处。此外,还缺乏对植根于行业和法规的 RWD 的端到端应用理解:我们旨在研究如何将社交媒体用作 RWD 来源,以支持制药行业的监管决策和药物开发。我们旨在具体探索数据管道,研究社交媒体衍生的 RWD 如何与美国食品药品管理局的监管指南和行业需求保持一致:方法:我们开发了一个机器学习管道,从 X(Twitter)数据中提取与抗凝剂相关的患者见解。然后从行业角度对这些发现进行分析,并与一家制药公司的专业人士进行访谈:结果:分析揭示了几个使用案例,在这些案例中,从社交媒体中获得的 RWD 可以带来益处,尤其是在围绕患者和治疗领域的需求提出假设方面。我们还注意到社交媒体数据的某些局限性,特别是在推断因果关系方面:结论:社交媒体作为指导药物开发和审批前工作的 RWD 来源,具有相当大的潜力。尽管还需要对社交媒体在RWD中的使用提供进一步的监管指导以鼓励其使用,但监管和技术的发展表明,社交媒体至少可以探索性地用于药物开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug Safety
Drug Safety 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Safety is the official journal of the International Society of Pharmacovigilance. The journal includes: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues. Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on epidemiology, clinical features, prevention and management of adverse effects of individual drugs and drug classes. In-depth benefit-risk assessment of adverse effect and efficacy data for a drug in a defined therapeutic area. Systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies in disciplines such as pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilance, pharmacology and toxicology, and pharmacogenomics. Editorials and commentaries on topical issues. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Drug Safety Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信