Manufacturing DNA in E. coli yields higher fidelity DNA than in vitro enzymatic synthesis

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Steven J. Hersch, Siddarth Chandrasekaran, Jamie Lam, Nafiseh Nafissi, Roderick A. Slavcev
{"title":"Manufacturing DNA in E. coli yields higher fidelity DNA than in vitro enzymatic synthesis","authors":"Steven J. Hersch, Siddarth Chandrasekaran, Jamie Lam, Nafiseh Nafissi, Roderick A. Slavcev","doi":"10.1016/j.omtm.2024.101227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biotechnologies such as gene therapy have brought DNA vectors to the forefront of pharmaceuticals. The quality of starting material plays a pivotal role in determining final product quality. Here we examined the fidelity of DNA replication using enzymatic methods () compared to plasmid DNA produced in . Next-generation sequencing approaches rely on polymerases, which have inherent limitations in sensitivity. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel assay based on loss-of-function (LOF) mutations in the conditionally toxic gene. Our findings show that DNA production in results in significantly fewer LOF mutations (80- to 3000-fold less) compared to enzymatic DNA replication methods such as PCR and rolling circle amplification (RCA). These results suggest that using DNA produced by PCR or RCA may introduce a substantial number of mutation impurities, potentially affecting the quality and yield of final pharmaceutical products. Our study underscores that DNA synthesized has a significantly higher mutation rate than DNA produced traditionally in . Therefore, utilizing enzymatically-produced DNA in biotechnology and biomanufacturing may entail considerable fidelity-related risks, while using DNA starting material derived from substantially mitigates this risk.","PeriodicalId":54333,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Therapy-Methods & Clinical Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Therapy-Methods & Clinical Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2024.101227","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biotechnologies such as gene therapy have brought DNA vectors to the forefront of pharmaceuticals. The quality of starting material plays a pivotal role in determining final product quality. Here we examined the fidelity of DNA replication using enzymatic methods () compared to plasmid DNA produced in . Next-generation sequencing approaches rely on polymerases, which have inherent limitations in sensitivity. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel assay based on loss-of-function (LOF) mutations in the conditionally toxic gene. Our findings show that DNA production in results in significantly fewer LOF mutations (80- to 3000-fold less) compared to enzymatic DNA replication methods such as PCR and rolling circle amplification (RCA). These results suggest that using DNA produced by PCR or RCA may introduce a substantial number of mutation impurities, potentially affecting the quality and yield of final pharmaceutical products. Our study underscores that DNA synthesized has a significantly higher mutation rate than DNA produced traditionally in . Therefore, utilizing enzymatically-produced DNA in biotechnology and biomanufacturing may entail considerable fidelity-related risks, while using DNA starting material derived from substantially mitigates this risk.
与体外酶法合成相比,在大肠杆菌中制造 DNA 可获得保真度更高的 DNA
基因治疗等生物技术将 DNA 载体推向了制药业的前沿。起始材料的质量在决定最终产品质量方面起着至关重要的作用。在这里,我们研究了使用酶法()复制 DNA 的保真度,并与......中生产的质粒 DNA 进行了比较。下一代测序方法依赖于聚合酶,而聚合酶在灵敏度方面存在固有的局限性。为了应对这一挑战,我们引入了一种基于条件毒性基因功能缺失(LOF)突变的新型检测方法。我们的研究结果表明,与聚合酶链式反应(PCR)和滚动圈扩增(RCA)等酶DNA复制方法相比,DNA生产过程中产生的LOF突变明显较少(少80-3000倍)。这些结果表明,使用 PCR 或 RCA 生产的 DNA 可能会引入大量突变杂质,从而可能影响最终药品的质量和产量。我们的研究强调,合成 DNA 的突变率明显高于传统方法生产的 DNA。因此,在生物技术和生物制造中使用酶法生产的 DNA 可能会带来相当大的与保真度相关的风险,而使用来自的 DNA 起始材料则大大降低了这种风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Therapy-Methods & Clinical Development
Molecular Therapy-Methods & Clinical Development Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
163
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Molecular Therapy—Methods & Clinical Development is to build upon the success of Molecular Therapy in publishing important peer-reviewed methods and procedures, as well as translational advances in the broad array of fields under the molecular therapy umbrella. Topics of particular interest within the journal''s scope include: Gene vector engineering and production, Methods for targeted genome editing and engineering, Methods and technology development for cell reprogramming and directed differentiation of pluripotent cells, Methods for gene and cell vector delivery, Development of biomaterials and nanoparticles for applications in gene and cell therapy and regenerative medicine, Analysis of gene and cell vector biodistribution and tracking, Pharmacology/toxicology studies of new and next-generation vectors, Methods for cell isolation, engineering, culture, expansion, and transplantation, Cell processing, storage, and banking for therapeutic application, Preclinical and QC/QA assay development, Translational and clinical scale-up and Good Manufacturing procedures and process development, Clinical protocol development, Computational and bioinformatic methods for analysis, modeling, or visualization of biological data, Negotiating the regulatory approval process and obtaining such approval for clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信