{"title":"A new constitutive model of shape memory alloy and its seismic mitigation capacity compared with existing models","authors":"Jinlong Liu, Chen Chen, Junqi Lin, Zhile Yang","doi":"10.1177/13694332241237580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existing constitutive models of shape memory alloy (SMA) cannot accurately describe the mechanical behavior in martensitic strengthening segment since their loading and unloading paths in strengthening segment completely overlap. This study proposes a multi-segment linear mathematical model for SMA, which realizes the separation of loading path and unloading path in strengthening segment. A four-story steel frame structure and corresponding braced structures with various SMA constitutive models are designed, and seismic control effects of SMA braces with these models are analyzed and compared through time history analysis. The results show that the sub-cycle unloading mode of SMA constitutive model affects the seismic mitigation capacity of SMA brace in a certain extent. The position of the inflection point of unloading path has very little influence on the structural control ability of SMA braces. The SMA brace using the SMA constitutive model with a single linear sub-cyclic unloading path has the minimal seismic response and the highest seismic reduction ratio. For most evaluation indexes, the seismic mitigation ability calculated by the proposed path separation constitutive model is in the middle of the results calculated by the existing models. SMA models without considering the mechanical behavior of strengthening segment may lead to an erroneous estimation of the energy consumption of SMA brace and the structural damage. The difference of simulation results among various SMA constitutive models is almost independent with ground motion.","PeriodicalId":50849,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Structural Engineering","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332241237580","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The existing constitutive models of shape memory alloy (SMA) cannot accurately describe the mechanical behavior in martensitic strengthening segment since their loading and unloading paths in strengthening segment completely overlap. This study proposes a multi-segment linear mathematical model for SMA, which realizes the separation of loading path and unloading path in strengthening segment. A four-story steel frame structure and corresponding braced structures with various SMA constitutive models are designed, and seismic control effects of SMA braces with these models are analyzed and compared through time history analysis. The results show that the sub-cycle unloading mode of SMA constitutive model affects the seismic mitigation capacity of SMA brace in a certain extent. The position of the inflection point of unloading path has very little influence on the structural control ability of SMA braces. The SMA brace using the SMA constitutive model with a single linear sub-cyclic unloading path has the minimal seismic response and the highest seismic reduction ratio. For most evaluation indexes, the seismic mitigation ability calculated by the proposed path separation constitutive model is in the middle of the results calculated by the existing models. SMA models without considering the mechanical behavior of strengthening segment may lead to an erroneous estimation of the energy consumption of SMA brace and the structural damage. The difference of simulation results among various SMA constitutive models is almost independent with ground motion.
现有的形状记忆合金(SMA)构成模型无法准确描述马氏体强化段的力学行为,因为强化段的加载和卸载路径完全重叠。本研究提出了一种 SMA 多段线性数学模型,实现了强化段加载路径和卸载路径的分离。设计了一个四层钢框架结构和相应的具有不同 SMA 构成模型的支撑结构,并通过时间历程分析比较了这些模型下 SMA 支撑的抗震控制效果。结果表明,SMA 构造模型的次周期卸载模式在一定程度上影响了 SMA 支撑的抗震减灾能力。卸载路径拐点的位置对 SMA 支撑的结构控制能力影响很小。采用单一线性亚周期卸载路径的 SMA 构 造模型的 SMA 支撑具有最小的地震响应和最高的减震率。在大多数评价指标上,所提出的路径分离构成模型计算出的减震能力处于现有模型计算结果的中间位置。不考虑加强段力学行为的 SMA 模型可能会导致对 SMA 支撑能耗和结构损伤的错误估计。各种 SMA 构成模型之间的模拟结果差异几乎与地面运动无关。
期刊介绍:
Advances in Structural Engineering was established in 1997 and has become one of the major peer-reviewed journals in the field of structural engineering. To better fulfil the mission of the journal, we have recently decided to launch two new features for the journal: (a) invited review papers providing an in-depth exposition of a topic of significant current interest; (b) short papers reporting truly new technologies in structural engineering.