Attitudes of physicians and patients toward immediate and intraoperative chemotherapy treatment in colon cancer

Q3 Medicine
Mehraneh D. Jafari , Andrea Mesiti , Julianna Brouwer , Chelsea McKinney , Lari B. Wenzel , Alessio Pigazzi , Jason A. Zell
{"title":"Attitudes of physicians and patients toward immediate and intraoperative chemotherapy treatment in colon cancer","authors":"Mehraneh D. Jafari ,&nbsp;Andrea Mesiti ,&nbsp;Julianna Brouwer ,&nbsp;Chelsea McKinney ,&nbsp;Lari B. Wenzel ,&nbsp;Alessio Pigazzi ,&nbsp;Jason A. Zell","doi":"10.1016/j.ctarc.2024.100798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>We have shown in a Phase I trial that immediate adjuvant chemotherapy (IAC) during surgical resection and immediately postoperative is safe and feasible in patients with colon cancer (CC). IAC avoids delays in adjuvant treatment and has the potential to improve survival and quality of life. We aim to determine patients and providers attitudes toward this novel multidisciplinary treatment approach.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two web-based surveys were administered to newly diagnosed CC patients, survivors, surgeons and oncologists. Surveys assessed treatment preferences and perceived barriers to IAC. Chi-square tests were conducted to compare differences between patients’ and providers’ responses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Responses were collected from 35 patients and 40 providers. Patients were more willing to: (1) proceed with IAC to finish treatment earlier thus possibly improving quality of life (<em>p</em> = 0.001); (2) proceed with IAC despite potential side effects (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001); and (3) proceed with a dose of intraoperative chemotherapy even if on final pathology, may not have been needed (<em>p</em> = 0.002). Patients were more likely to indicate no barriers to collaborative care (<em>p</em> = 0.001) while providers were more likely to cite that it is time consuming, thus a barrier to participation (<em>p</em> = 0.001), has scheduling challenges (<em>p</em> = 0.001), and physicians are not available to participate (<em>p</em> = 0.003).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We observed a discordance between what providers and patients value in perioperative and adjuvant CC treatment. Patients are willing to accept IAC despite potential side effects and without survival benefit, highlighting the importance of understanding patient preference.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9507,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment and research communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294224000108/pdfft?md5=8ca70afb2272b954ac368cf708081f3c&pid=1-s2.0-S2468294224000108-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment and research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294224000108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

We have shown in a Phase I trial that immediate adjuvant chemotherapy (IAC) during surgical resection and immediately postoperative is safe and feasible in patients with colon cancer (CC). IAC avoids delays in adjuvant treatment and has the potential to improve survival and quality of life. We aim to determine patients and providers attitudes toward this novel multidisciplinary treatment approach.

Methods

Two web-based surveys were administered to newly diagnosed CC patients, survivors, surgeons and oncologists. Surveys assessed treatment preferences and perceived barriers to IAC. Chi-square tests were conducted to compare differences between patients’ and providers’ responses.

Results

Responses were collected from 35 patients and 40 providers. Patients were more willing to: (1) proceed with IAC to finish treatment earlier thus possibly improving quality of life (p = 0.001); (2) proceed with IAC despite potential side effects (p < 0.001); and (3) proceed with a dose of intraoperative chemotherapy even if on final pathology, may not have been needed (p = 0.002). Patients were more likely to indicate no barriers to collaborative care (p = 0.001) while providers were more likely to cite that it is time consuming, thus a barrier to participation (p = 0.001), has scheduling challenges (p = 0.001), and physicians are not available to participate (p = 0.003).

Conclusions

We observed a discordance between what providers and patients value in perioperative and adjuvant CC treatment. Patients are willing to accept IAC despite potential side effects and without survival benefit, highlighting the importance of understanding patient preference.

医生和患者对结肠癌术中即时化疗的态度
导言我们在一项一期试验中表明,对结肠癌(CC)患者来说,在手术切除期间和术后立即进行辅助化疗(IAC)是安全可行的。IAC 可避免辅助治疗的延误,并有可能提高生存率和生活质量。我们旨在确定患者和医疗服务提供者对这种新型多学科治疗方法的态度。方法对新诊断的 CC 患者、幸存者、外科医生和肿瘤学家进行了两次网络调查。调查评估了治疗偏好和对 IAC 的认知障碍。结果共收集到 35 名患者和 40 名医疗人员的回复。患者更愿意(1)进行 IAC 以提前结束治疗,从而可能改善生活质量 (p=0.001);(2)尽管存在潜在的副作用,但仍愿意进行 IAC (p<0.001);(3)即使最终病理结果显示可能不需要术中化疗,但仍愿意进行一定剂量的术中化疗 (p=0.002)。患者更有可能表示合作护理没有障碍(p = 0.001),而医疗服务提供者更有可能表示合作护理耗时,因此是参与合作护理的障碍(p = 0.001),在时间安排上有困难(p = 0.001),医生无法参与合作护理(p = 0.003)。尽管存在潜在的副作用且没有生存益处,患者仍愿意接受 IAC,这凸显了了解患者偏好的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment and Research Communications is an international peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing comprehensive basic, translational, and clinical oncology research. The journal is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, policy, and treatment of cancer and provides a global forum for the nurturing and development of future generations of oncology scientists. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications publishes comprehensive reviews and original studies describing various aspects of basic through clinical research of all tumor types. The journal also accepts clinical studies in oncology, with an emphasis on prospective early phase clinical trials. Specific areas of interest include basic, translational, and clinical research and mechanistic approaches; cancer biology; molecular carcinogenesis; genetics and genomics; stem cell and developmental biology; immunology; molecular and cellular oncology; systems biology; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; cancer policy; and integration of various approaches. Our mission is to be the premier source of relevant information through promoting excellence in research and facilitating the timely translation of that science to health care and clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信