Prioritizing mobility factors for assessment during the transition of older adults from hospital to home: a cross-sectional survey of physiotherapists in Southeastern Nigeria.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2024.2324351
D G Rayner, P Charles, S Maduagwu, A Odega, M E Kalu
{"title":"Prioritizing mobility factors for assessment during the transition of older adults from hospital to home: a cross-sectional survey of physiotherapists in Southeastern Nigeria.","authors":"D G Rayner, P Charles, S Maduagwu, A Odega, M E Kalu","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2324351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing all factors influencing older adults' mobility during the hospital-to-home transition is not feasible given the complex and time-sensitive nature of hospital discharge processes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the mobility factors that Nigerian physiotherapists prioritize to be assessed during hospital-to-home transition of older adults and explore the differences in the prioritization of mobility factors across the physiotherapists' demographics and practice variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 121 physiotherapists who completed an online questionnaire, ranking 74 mobility factors using a nine-point Likert scale. A factor was prioritized if ≥ 70% of physiotherapists rated the factor as \"Critical\" (scores ≥7) and ≤ 15% of physiotherapists rated a factor as \"Not Important\" (scores ≤3). We assessed the differences in the prioritization of mobility factors across the physiotherapists' demographics/practice variables using Mann Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Forty-three of 74 factors were prioritized: four cognitive, two environmental, one financial, four personal, eighteen physical, seven psychological, and seven social factors. Males and those with self-reported expertise in each mobility determinants more frequently rated factors as critical.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prioritizing many mobility factors underscores the complex nature of mobility, suggesting that an interdisciplinary approach to addressing these factors may enhance post-hospital discharge mobility outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"239-251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2324351","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Assessing all factors influencing older adults' mobility during the hospital-to-home transition is not feasible given the complex and time-sensitive nature of hospital discharge processes.

Objective: To describe the mobility factors that Nigerian physiotherapists prioritize to be assessed during hospital-to-home transition of older adults and explore the differences in the prioritization of mobility factors across the physiotherapists' demographics and practice variables.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 121 physiotherapists who completed an online questionnaire, ranking 74 mobility factors using a nine-point Likert scale. A factor was prioritized if ≥ 70% of physiotherapists rated the factor as "Critical" (scores ≥7) and ≤ 15% of physiotherapists rated a factor as "Not Important" (scores ≤3). We assessed the differences in the prioritization of mobility factors across the physiotherapists' demographics/practice variables using Mann Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

Findings: Forty-three of 74 factors were prioritized: four cognitive, two environmental, one financial, four personal, eighteen physical, seven psychological, and seven social factors. Males and those with self-reported expertise in each mobility determinants more frequently rated factors as critical.

Conclusion: Prioritizing many mobility factors underscores the complex nature of mobility, suggesting that an interdisciplinary approach to addressing these factors may enhance post-hospital discharge mobility outcomes.

尼日利亚东南部物理治疗师横断面调查:老年人从医院向家庭过渡期间优先评估的行动能力因素。
背景:鉴于出院过程的复杂性和时间敏感性,评估影响老年人从医院到居家过渡期间行动能力的所有因素是不可行的:鉴于出院过程的复杂性和时间敏感性,在从医院到家庭的过渡期间评估影响老年人行动能力的所有因素是不可行的:目的:描述尼日利亚物理治疗师在老年人从医院到家庭的转院过程中优先评估的行动能力因素,并探讨物理治疗师的人口统计学和实践变量在优先评估行动能力因素方面的差异:这项横断面研究包括 121 名物理治疗师,他们填写了一份在线问卷,使用九点李克特量表对 74 个活动能力因素进行了排序。如果≥70%的物理治疗师将某一因素评为 "关键"(得分≥7),且≤15%的物理治疗师将某一因素评为 "不重要"(得分≤3),则该因素被列为优先考虑因素。我们使用 Mann Whitney U 和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验法评估了不同物理治疗师的人口统计学/执业变量在移动因素优先级上的差异:在74个因素中,有43个因素被列为优先考虑因素:4个认知因素、2个环境因素、1个经济因素、4个个人因素、18个身体因素、7个心理因素和7个社会因素。男性和自称在各项流动性决定因素方面具有专长的人更常将这些因素评为关键因素:结论:优先考虑多种行动能力因素强调了行动能力的复杂性,这表明采用跨学科方法来解决这些因素可能会改善出院后的行动能力预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信