Translating evidence into practice in primary care management of adolescents and women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a mixed-methods study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Stephanie Cowan, Lisa Moran, Rhonda Garad, Elizabeth Sturgiss, Siew Lim, Carolyn Ee
{"title":"Translating evidence into practice in primary care management of adolescents and women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Stephanie Cowan, Lisa Moran, Rhonda Garad, Elizabeth Sturgiss, Siew Lim, Carolyn Ee","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmae007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The international guideline on polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) provides evidence-based recommendations on the management of PCOS. Guideline implementation tools (GItools) were developed for general practitioner (GP) use to aid rapid translation of guidelines into practice. This mixed-methods study aimed to evaluate barriers and enablers of the uptake of PCOS GItools in general practice.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was distributed through professional networks and social media to GPs and GPs in training in Australia. Survey respondents were invited to contribute to semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative data were thematically analysed and mapped deductively to the Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study engaged 146 GPs through surveys, supplemented by interviews with 14 participants. A key enabler to capability was reflective practice. Barriers relating to opportunity included limited awareness and difficulty locating and using GItools due to length and lack of integration into practice software, while enablers included ensuring recommendations were relevant to GP scope of practice. Enablers relevant to motivation included co-use with patients, and evidence of improved outcomes with the use of GItools.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study highlights inherent barriers within the Australian healthcare system that hinder GPs from integrating evidence for PCOS. Findings will underpin behaviour change interventions to assist GPs in effectively utilising guidelines in clinical practice, therefore minimising variations in care. While our findings will have a direct influence on guideline translation initiatives, changes at organisational and policy levels are also needed to address identified barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11017779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmae007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The international guideline on polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) provides evidence-based recommendations on the management of PCOS. Guideline implementation tools (GItools) were developed for general practitioner (GP) use to aid rapid translation of guidelines into practice. This mixed-methods study aimed to evaluate barriers and enablers of the uptake of PCOS GItools in general practice.

Design and setting: A cross-sectional survey was distributed through professional networks and social media to GPs and GPs in training in Australia. Survey respondents were invited to contribute to semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative data were thematically analysed and mapped deductively to the Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour model.

Results: The study engaged 146 GPs through surveys, supplemented by interviews with 14 participants. A key enabler to capability was reflective practice. Barriers relating to opportunity included limited awareness and difficulty locating and using GItools due to length and lack of integration into practice software, while enablers included ensuring recommendations were relevant to GP scope of practice. Enablers relevant to motivation included co-use with patients, and evidence of improved outcomes with the use of GItools.

Discussion: This study highlights inherent barriers within the Australian healthcare system that hinder GPs from integrating evidence for PCOS. Findings will underpin behaviour change interventions to assist GPs in effectively utilising guidelines in clinical practice, therefore minimising variations in care. While our findings will have a direct influence on guideline translation initiatives, changes at organisational and policy levels are also needed to address identified barriers.

将多囊卵巢综合征青少年和妇女初级保健管理中的证据转化为实践:一项混合方法研究。
背景:多囊卵巢综合症(PCOS)国际指南为多囊卵巢综合症的治疗提供了循证建议。指南实施工具(GItools)是为全科医生(GP)开发的,以帮助将指南快速转化为实践。这项混合方法研究旨在评估全科医生采用 PCOS GItools 的障碍和促进因素:通过专业网络和社交媒体向澳大利亚的全科医生和正在接受培训的全科医生发放了一份横断面调查问卷。邀请调查对象参与半结构化访谈。对访谈进行了录音和逐字记录。对定性数据进行了主题分析,并与理论领域框架和能力、机会、动机和行为模型进行了演绎映射:研究通过问卷调查与 146 名全科医生进行了交流,并对 14 名参与者进行了访谈。反思性实践是提高能力的关键因素。与机会有关的障碍包括认识有限,以及由于篇幅过长和缺乏与实践软件的整合而难以找到和使用 GItools,而促进因素包括确保建议与全科医生的实践范围相关。与动机相关的有利因素包括与患者共同使用,以及有证据表明使用 GItools 可改善疗效:本研究强调了澳大利亚医疗保健系统中存在的固有障碍,这些障碍阻碍了全科医生整合有关多囊卵巢综合征的证据。研究结果将为行为改变干预措施提供依据,以帮助全科医生在临床实践中有效利用指南,从而最大限度地减少护理差异。尽管我们的研究结果将对指南转化倡议产生直接影响,但还需要在组织和政策层面进行变革,以解决已发现的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信