Rainbow phlebotomy collection and urine aliquots for emergency department add-on testing in the era of pandemic-driven supply shortages.

Scott Potter, Joseph W Rudolf, Lauren N Pearson
{"title":"Rainbow phlebotomy collection and urine aliquots for emergency department add-on testing in the era of pandemic-driven supply shortages.","authors":"Scott Potter, Joseph W Rudolf, Lauren N Pearson","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmae011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rainbow blood draws for add-on testing in the emergency department (ED) are a common practice at our institution. We sought to determine the prevalence of this practice among reference laboratory clients and characterize the impact of pandemic-driven supply shortages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study surveyed 354 client laboratories to understand specimen collection practices in specific clinical environments and how these practices may have been affected by supply chain shortages. Data analysis by descriptive statistics was performed in Qualtrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 138 laboratories took the survey (39% response rate) with 57% indicating that their ED performed rainbow draws. Of these, 16% have a formal policy regarding rainbow draws, and 76% of respondents indicated that their institution was required to modify practices due to pandemic-driven supply shortages. A total of 19% indicated they routinely collect multiple urine aliquots for add-on testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rainbow draws and collection of urine aliquots in the ED for add-on testing are relatively common practices, with few institutions maintaining formal policies regarding the practice. Pandemic-driven supply chain shortages affected a majority of respondent laboratories and local cost-benefit analysis regarding extra specimen collection is recommended to limit waste of laboratory resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"585-589"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmae011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rainbow blood draws for add-on testing in the emergency department (ED) are a common practice at our institution. We sought to determine the prevalence of this practice among reference laboratory clients and characterize the impact of pandemic-driven supply shortages.

Methods: This cross-sectional study surveyed 354 client laboratories to understand specimen collection practices in specific clinical environments and how these practices may have been affected by supply chain shortages. Data analysis by descriptive statistics was performed in Qualtrics.

Results: A total of 138 laboratories took the survey (39% response rate) with 57% indicating that their ED performed rainbow draws. Of these, 16% have a formal policy regarding rainbow draws, and 76% of respondents indicated that their institution was required to modify practices due to pandemic-driven supply shortages. A total of 19% indicated they routinely collect multiple urine aliquots for add-on testing.

Conclusion: Rainbow draws and collection of urine aliquots in the ED for add-on testing are relatively common practices, with few institutions maintaining formal policies regarding the practice. Pandemic-driven supply chain shortages affected a majority of respondent laboratories and local cost-benefit analysis regarding extra specimen collection is recommended to limit waste of laboratory resources.

在大流行病导致供应短缺的时代,彩虹抽血采集和尿液等分,用于急诊科附加检验。
背景:在我院,急诊科(ED)抽取彩虹血进行附加检验是一种常见的做法。我们试图确定这种做法在参考实验室客户中的普遍程度,并描述大流行病导致的供应短缺的影响:这项横断面研究调查了 354 家客户实验室,以了解在特定临床环境中的标本采集实践,以及供应链短缺对这些实践的影响。数据分析在 Qualtrics 中通过描述性统计进行:共有 138 家实验室接受了调查(回复率为 39%),其中 57% 的实验室表示他们的 ED 进行过彩虹抽血。其中 16% 的受访者制定了有关彩虹抽血的正式政策,76% 的受访者表示,由于大流行导致供应短缺,他们所在的机构需要修改做法。共有 19% 的受访者表示,他们会例行收集多个尿液等分样品用于附加检测:结论:在急诊室进行彩虹抽血和收集尿液等分进行附加检验是相对常见的做法,但很少有机构对这种做法制定正式的政策。大流行导致的供应链短缺影响了大多数受访实验室,建议对额外标本采集进行本地成本效益分析,以限制实验室资源的浪费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信