Virtual clinical QT exposure-response studies – A translational computational approach

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jazmin Aguado-Sierra , Paula Dominguez-Gomez , Ani Amar , Constantine Butakoff , Michael Leitner , Stefan Schaper , Jan M. Kriegl , Borje Darpo , Mariano Vazquez , Georg Rast
{"title":"Virtual clinical QT exposure-response studies – A translational computational approach","authors":"Jazmin Aguado-Sierra ,&nbsp;Paula Dominguez-Gomez ,&nbsp;Ani Amar ,&nbsp;Constantine Butakoff ,&nbsp;Michael Leitner ,&nbsp;Stefan Schaper ,&nbsp;Jan M. Kriegl ,&nbsp;Borje Darpo ,&nbsp;Mariano Vazquez ,&nbsp;Georg Rast","doi":"10.1016/j.vascn.2024.107498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>A recent paradigm shift in proarrhythmic risk assessment suggests that the integration of clinical, non-clinical, and computational evidence can be used to reach a comprehensive understanding of the proarrhythmic potential of drug candidates. While current computational methodologies focus on predicting the incidence of proarrhythmic events after drug administration, the objective of this study is to predict concentration-response relationships of QTc as a clinical endpoint.</p></div><div><h3>Experimental approach</h3><p>Full heart computational models reproducing human cardiac populations were created to predict the concentration-response relationship of changes in the QT interval as recommended for clinical trials. The concentration-response relationship of the QT-interval prolongation obtained from the computational cardiac population was compared against the relationship from clinical trial data for a set of well-characterized compounds: moxifloxacin, dofetilide, verapamil, and ondansetron.</p></div><div><h3>Key results</h3><p>Computationally derived concentration–response relationships of QT interval changes for three of the four drugs had slopes within the confidence interval of clinical trials (dofetilide, moxifloxacin and verapamil) when compared to placebo-corrected concentration-ΔQT and concentration-ΔQT regressions. Moxifloxacin showed a higher intercept, outside the confidence interval of the clinical data, demonstrating that in this example, the standard linear regression does not appropriately capture the concentration-response results at very low concentrations. The concentrations corresponding to a mean QTc prolongation of 10 ms were consistently lower in the computational model than in clinical data. The critical concentration varied within an approximate ratio of 0.5 (moxifloxacin and ondansetron) and 1 times (dofetilide, verapamil) the critical concentration observed in human clinical trials. Notably, no other in silico methodology can approximate the human critical concentration values for a QT interval prolongation of 10 ms.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion and implications</h3><p>Computational concentration-response modelling of a virtual population of high-resolution, 3-dimensional cardiac models can provide comparable information to clinical data and could be used to complement pre-clinical and clinical safety packages. It provides access to an unlimited exposure range to support trial design and can improve the understanding of pre-clinical-clinical translation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 107498"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105687192400008X/pdfft?md5=b5092df8fcf19f1a1773ed3d333347a7&pid=1-s2.0-S105687192400008X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105687192400008X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

A recent paradigm shift in proarrhythmic risk assessment suggests that the integration of clinical, non-clinical, and computational evidence can be used to reach a comprehensive understanding of the proarrhythmic potential of drug candidates. While current computational methodologies focus on predicting the incidence of proarrhythmic events after drug administration, the objective of this study is to predict concentration-response relationships of QTc as a clinical endpoint.

Experimental approach

Full heart computational models reproducing human cardiac populations were created to predict the concentration-response relationship of changes in the QT interval as recommended for clinical trials. The concentration-response relationship of the QT-interval prolongation obtained from the computational cardiac population was compared against the relationship from clinical trial data for a set of well-characterized compounds: moxifloxacin, dofetilide, verapamil, and ondansetron.

Key results

Computationally derived concentration–response relationships of QT interval changes for three of the four drugs had slopes within the confidence interval of clinical trials (dofetilide, moxifloxacin and verapamil) when compared to placebo-corrected concentration-ΔQT and concentration-ΔQT regressions. Moxifloxacin showed a higher intercept, outside the confidence interval of the clinical data, demonstrating that in this example, the standard linear regression does not appropriately capture the concentration-response results at very low concentrations. The concentrations corresponding to a mean QTc prolongation of 10 ms were consistently lower in the computational model than in clinical data. The critical concentration varied within an approximate ratio of 0.5 (moxifloxacin and ondansetron) and 1 times (dofetilide, verapamil) the critical concentration observed in human clinical trials. Notably, no other in silico methodology can approximate the human critical concentration values for a QT interval prolongation of 10 ms.

Conclusion and implications

Computational concentration-response modelling of a virtual population of high-resolution, 3-dimensional cardiac models can provide comparable information to clinical data and could be used to complement pre-clinical and clinical safety packages. It provides access to an unlimited exposure range to support trial design and can improve the understanding of pre-clinical-clinical translation.

虚拟临床 QT 暴露-反应研究--一种转化计算方法。
背景和目的:最近,致心律失常风险评估的范式发生了转变,这表明可以通过整合临床、非临床和计算证据来全面了解候选药物的致心律失常潜能。目前的计算方法侧重于预测用药后原心律失常事件的发生率,而本研究的目标则是预测作为临床终点的 QTc 的浓度-反应关系:实验方法:根据临床试验的建议,创建了再现人类心脏群体的全心脏计算模型,以预测 QT 间期变化的浓度-反应关系。实验方法:创建了再现人类心脏群体的全心脏计算模型,预测临床试验推荐的 QT 间期变化的浓度-反应关系,并将从计算心脏群体中获得的 QT 间期延长的浓度-反应关系与一组特征明确的化合物(莫西沙星、多非利特、维拉帕米和昂丹司琼)的临床试验数据的浓度-反应关系进行比较:与安慰剂校正浓度-ΔQT和浓度-ΔQT回归相比,四种药物中三种药物的QT间期变化的计算得出的浓度-反应关系的斜率在临床试验的置信区间内(多非利特、莫西沙星和维拉帕米)。莫西沙星显示出较高的截距,超出了临床数据的置信区间,这表明在本例中,标准线性回归不能恰当地反映极低浓度时的浓度-反应曲线。在计算模型中,QTc 平均延长 10 毫秒所对应的浓度始终低于临床数据。临界浓度在人体临床试验观察到的临界浓度的 0.5 倍(莫西沙星和昂丹司琼)和 1 倍(多非利特、维拉帕米)的大致范围内变化。值得注意的是,在 QT 间期延长 10 毫秒的情况下,没有任何其他硅学方法可以接近人体临界浓度值:高分辨率三维心脏模型虚拟群体的计算浓度-反应模型可提供与临床数据相当的信息,可用于补充临床前和临床安全性包。它提供了无限的暴露范围以支持试验设计,并能提高对临床前-临床转化的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods publishes original articles on current methods of investigation used in pharmacology and toxicology. Pharmacology and toxicology are defined in the broadest sense, referring to actions of drugs and chemicals on all living systems. With its international editorial board and noted contributors, Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods is the leading journal devoted exclusively to experimental procedures used by pharmacologists and toxicologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信