Characterizing long-term outcomes following AMA discharges after assault-related penetrating trauma.

Ted J Chung, Rachel M Nygaard, Ellie Moon, Logan Peter, Peter Bodurtha, Tyler Winkelman, Derek C Lumbard
{"title":"Characterizing long-term outcomes following AMA discharges after assault-related penetrating trauma.","authors":"Ted J Chung, Rachel M Nygaard, Ellie Moon, Logan Peter, Peter Bodurtha, Tyler Winkelman, Derek C Lumbard","doi":"10.5249/jivr.v16i1.1875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients discharged against medical advice do not receive adequate treatment and have a greater risk of readmission. This study assessed the rate of discharges against medical advice following assault-related penetrating trauma, with secondary aims to evaluate long term pre/post-injury hospitalizations and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult assault-related penetrating injuries admitted to a Level 1 Trauma Center were identified in the prospectively maintained database. Chart review was conducted for hospitalizations ± 5 years from index injury and statewide mortality data was used to identify deaths outside of hospital care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of a total of 1,744 assault-related penetrated injuries, 3.2% (52/1630) of survivors discharged against medical advice. Reasons for discharge against medical advice included: unknown (38%), home/child/family/pets (25%), unhappy with care/restrictions (23%), and work/money/other (13%). Post-discharge mortality did not differ between routine (6.5%) and against medical advice discharge (3.9%). Against medical advice and routine discharge had similar rates of any hospitalization (38.5 v 28.2%) and trauma hospitalization in prior 5-years (35 v 36%). However, significantly more against medical advice discharges had prior hospitalizations involving drug or alcohol abuse (65 v 38%), but not mental health diagnosis (55 v 55%). Significantly more against medical advice discharges have post-injury hospitalizations compared to routine discharges (48 vs 26.5%); however, include similar rates of repeat traumatic injury (36 v 32%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Those with against medical advice discharges were significantly more likely to have prior hospitalizations involving drug or alcohol abuse and significantly higher rates of post-injury hospitalizations. However, we did not see an increase in repeat traumatic injury or post-discharge mortality in those with against medical advice discharges when compared to those with routine discharges.</p>","PeriodicalId":73795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of injury & violence research","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of injury & violence research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v16i1.1875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients discharged against medical advice do not receive adequate treatment and have a greater risk of readmission. This study assessed the rate of discharges against medical advice following assault-related penetrating trauma, with secondary aims to evaluate long term pre/post-injury hospitalizations and mortality.

Methods: Adult assault-related penetrating injuries admitted to a Level 1 Trauma Center were identified in the prospectively maintained database. Chart review was conducted for hospitalizations ± 5 years from index injury and statewide mortality data was used to identify deaths outside of hospital care.

Results: Out of a total of 1,744 assault-related penetrated injuries, 3.2% (52/1630) of survivors discharged against medical advice. Reasons for discharge against medical advice included: unknown (38%), home/child/family/pets (25%), unhappy with care/restrictions (23%), and work/money/other (13%). Post-discharge mortality did not differ between routine (6.5%) and against medical advice discharge (3.9%). Against medical advice and routine discharge had similar rates of any hospitalization (38.5 v 28.2%) and trauma hospitalization in prior 5-years (35 v 36%). However, significantly more against medical advice discharges had prior hospitalizations involving drug or alcohol abuse (65 v 38%), but not mental health diagnosis (55 v 55%). Significantly more against medical advice discharges have post-injury hospitalizations compared to routine discharges (48 vs 26.5%); however, include similar rates of repeat traumatic injury (36 v 32%).

Conclusions: Those with against medical advice discharges were significantly more likely to have prior hospitalizations involving drug or alcohol abuse and significantly higher rates of post-injury hospitalizations. However, we did not see an increase in repeat traumatic injury or post-discharge mortality in those with against medical advice discharges when compared to those with routine discharges.

与袭击有关的穿透性创伤后,AMA 出院后长期疗效的特征。
背景:违反医嘱出院的患者得不到适当的治疗,再次入院的风险更大。本研究评估了与攻击相关的穿透性创伤后违反医嘱出院的比例,其次是评估伤前/伤后的长期住院情况和死亡率:方法: 在前瞻性维护的数据库中确定一级创伤中心收治的与攻击相关的成人穿透性创伤患者。对受伤后 5 年内的住院情况进行病历审查,并使用全州的死亡率数据来确定医院外的死亡情况:结果:在总共 1744 例与攻击相关的穿透伤中,3.2%(52/1630)的幸存者不遵医嘱出院。违背医嘱出院的原因包括:未知(38%)、家庭/孩子/家人/宠物(25%)、对护理/限制不满(23%)以及工作/金钱/其他(13%)。出院后死亡率在常规出院(6.5%)和遵医嘱出院(3.9%)之间没有差异。违反医嘱出院和常规出院的任何住院率(38.5% 对 28.2%)和前 5 年的外伤住院率(35% 对 36%)相似。然而,违反医嘱出院的患者中,曾因滥用药物或酗酒而住院的人数明显增多(65 对 38%),而精神健康诊断住院的人数则没有明显增多(55 对 55%)。与常规出院者相比,违反医嘱出院者在受伤后住院的比例明显更高(48% 对 26.5%);但其中包括类似的重复外伤率(36% 对 32%):结论:不遵医嘱出院者之前因吸毒或酗酒住院的可能性明显更高,受伤后住院的比例也明显更高。然而,与常规出院者相比,我们并未发现违反医嘱出院者的重复外伤或出院后死亡率有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信