Editorial Commentary: Endoscopic Repair of Abductor Tendon Tears Results in Variable Patient Reported Outcomes and Generally Good to Excellent Results

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
{"title":"Editorial Commentary: Endoscopic Repair of Abductor Tendon Tears Results in Variable Patient Reported Outcomes and Generally Good to Excellent Results","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.02.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Abductor tendon pathology is fairly common, with up to a 25% incidence in patients having total hip arthroplasty and 30% having hip arthroscopy. A systematic review of endoscopic abductor tendon repair demonstrated that as few as 41% of patients with endoscopic repair of abductor tendon tears achieve a patient acceptable satisfactory state, but a major limitation of systematic reviews is extreme heterogeneity between included studies. Surgical techniques and skills differ, as do tear severity and confounding pathology such as labral tears. Another limitation is a focus on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs are important (we prefer happy patients with poor healing to unhappy patients with healed repairs), but PROMs are also “subjective,” and different cohorts of patients in different studies from different locations may have different perceptions or goals with regard to pain and function. As surgeons, we are able to observe gait, strength, and, with advanced imaging when indicated or for research purposes, healing. These, combined with PROMs, influence overall assessment of outcome. Experience and review of the literature show that endoscopic surgical repair of abductor tendon tears generally shows good or excellent results. If a patient has significant pain improvement and objectively improved gait, a calculation of an outcome threshold based on a subjective survey may not tell the full story.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806324001634","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abductor tendon pathology is fairly common, with up to a 25% incidence in patients having total hip arthroplasty and 30% having hip arthroscopy. A systematic review of endoscopic abductor tendon repair demonstrated that as few as 41% of patients with endoscopic repair of abductor tendon tears achieve a patient acceptable satisfactory state, but a major limitation of systematic reviews is extreme heterogeneity between included studies. Surgical techniques and skills differ, as do tear severity and confounding pathology such as labral tears. Another limitation is a focus on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs are important (we prefer happy patients with poor healing to unhappy patients with healed repairs), but PROMs are also “subjective,” and different cohorts of patients in different studies from different locations may have different perceptions or goals with regard to pain and function. As surgeons, we are able to observe gait, strength, and, with advanced imaging when indicated or for research purposes, healing. These, combined with PROMs, influence overall assessment of outcome. Experience and review of the literature show that endoscopic surgical repair of abductor tendon tears generally shows good or excellent results. If a patient has significant pain improvement and objectively improved gait, a calculation of an outcome threshold based on a subjective survey may not tell the full story.

内窥镜修复内收肌腱撕裂术的患者报告结果各异,但总体效果良好至卓越。
内收肌腱病变相当常见,在接受全髋关节置换术和髋关节镜手术的患者中,内收肌腱病变发生率分别高达 25% 和 30%。一项关于内窥镜内收肌腱修复术的系统性综述显示,内窥镜内收肌腱撕裂修复术患者中只有41%能达到患者可接受的满意状态(PASS),但系统性综述的一个主要局限是所纳入研究之间存在极大的异质性。手术技术和技能各不相同,撕裂的严重程度和唇裂等混杂病理也不尽相同。另一个局限性是关注患者报告的结果指标(PROMs)。PROMs固然重要(我们更喜欢愈合不佳的满意患者,而不是愈合修复的不满意患者),但PROMs也是 "主观的",不同地点不同研究中的不同患者群体可能对疼痛和功能有不同的看法或目标。作为外科医生,我们能够观察步态、力量,并在必要时或出于研究目的使用先进的成像技术观察愈合情况。这些与 PROMs 结合起来,会影响对治疗结果的整体评估。经验和文献综述显示,内收肌腱撕裂的内窥镜手术修复一般都能取得良好或卓越的效果。如果患者的疼痛有明显改善,步态也有客观改善,那么根据主观调查来计算疗效阈值可能并不能说明全部问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信