Cost-effective Solution for Maxillofacial Reconstruction Surgery with Virtual Surgical Planning and 3D Printed Cutting Guides Reduces Operative Time.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Plastic surgery Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-15 DOI:10.1177/22925503221078692
Andrea Nallely Garza-Cisneros, Mauricio Manuel García-Pérez, William Josef Rodriguez-Guajardo, Guillermo Elizondo-Riojas, Adrian A Negreros-Osuna
{"title":"Cost-effective Solution for Maxillofacial Reconstruction Surgery with Virtual Surgical Planning and 3D Printed Cutting Guides Reduces Operative Time.","authors":"Andrea Nallely Garza-Cisneros, Mauricio Manuel García-Pérez, William Josef Rodriguez-Guajardo, Guillermo Elizondo-Riojas, Adrian A Negreros-Osuna","doi":"10.1177/22925503221078692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This study aimed to explore a low-cost solution for virtual surgical planning/3D printed surgical guides in a training hospital, assessing the impact on intraoperative time and bleeding. <b>Material and Methods</b>: We included a total of 13 patients. 8 who underwent maxillofacial reconstruction surgery with fibula-free flap utilizing virtual surgical planning/3D printed guides (VP/SG), and 5 using conventional surgery (CS) from 2017 to 2020. The surgical time, bleeding, length of hospital stay, and comorbidities were collected and compared in two groups. We recorded the average cost for the complete surgical planning and 3D printed guides. We applied a qualitative survey to the surgeons involved in the surgical procedures. <b>Results</b> The mean surgical time in the VP/SG group was 8.16 ± 2.7, compared to the CS group 12.5 ± 3.8, showing a 4.34 hours difference with statistical significance (p = 0.033). Patients from the CS group had a higher bleeding volume of 921 ± 467.6 mL VS 760 ± 633.8 mL in the VP/SG group. The average cost for the complete surgical planning and 3D printed guides was 914.44 ± 46.39 USD. All the surgeons who answered the survey preferred to perform the procedure utilizing the virtual planning/3D printed guides. <b>Conclusions</b> Virtual planning and 3D printed surgical guides have the potential to reduce operation time in maxillofacial reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10902495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503221078692","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to explore a low-cost solution for virtual surgical planning/3D printed surgical guides in a training hospital, assessing the impact on intraoperative time and bleeding. Material and Methods: We included a total of 13 patients. 8 who underwent maxillofacial reconstruction surgery with fibula-free flap utilizing virtual surgical planning/3D printed guides (VP/SG), and 5 using conventional surgery (CS) from 2017 to 2020. The surgical time, bleeding, length of hospital stay, and comorbidities were collected and compared in two groups. We recorded the average cost for the complete surgical planning and 3D printed guides. We applied a qualitative survey to the surgeons involved in the surgical procedures. Results The mean surgical time in the VP/SG group was 8.16 ± 2.7, compared to the CS group 12.5 ± 3.8, showing a 4.34 hours difference with statistical significance (p = 0.033). Patients from the CS group had a higher bleeding volume of 921 ± 467.6 mL VS 760 ± 633.8 mL in the VP/SG group. The average cost for the complete surgical planning and 3D printed guides was 914.44 ± 46.39 USD. All the surgeons who answered the survey preferred to perform the procedure utilizing the virtual planning/3D printed guides. Conclusions Virtual planning and 3D printed surgical guides have the potential to reduce operation time in maxillofacial reconstruction.

具有成本效益的颌面重建手术解决方案,采用虚拟手术规划和 3D 打印切割导板,缩短了手术时间。
背景:本研究旨在一家培训医院探索虚拟手术规划/3D 打印手术指南的低成本解决方案,评估其对术中时间和出血量的影响。材料与方法:我们共纳入了 13 名患者。8名患者在2017年至2020年期间接受了使用虚拟手术规划/三维打印手术指南(VP/SG)的无腓骨皮瓣颌面重建手术,5名患者接受了使用传统手术(CS)的无腓骨皮瓣颌面重建手术。我们收集并比较了两组患者的手术时间、出血量、住院时间和合并症。我们记录了完整手术规划和 3D 打印导板的平均成本。我们对参与手术的外科医生进行了定性调查。结果 VP/SG 组的平均手术时间为(8.16 ± 2.7)小时,而 CS 组为(12.5 ± 3.8)小时,两者相差 4.34 小时,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.033)。CS 组患者的出血量为 921 ± 467.6 mL,高于 VP/SG 组的 760 ± 633.8 mL。完整手术规划和 3D 打印导板的平均成本为 914.44 ± 46.39 美元。所有回答调查的外科医生都倾向于使用虚拟规划/三维打印指南进行手术。结论 虚拟规划和 3D 打印手术指南有可能缩短颌面重建手术的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plastic surgery
Plastic surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Plastic Surgery (Chirurgie Plastique) is the official journal of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Group for the Advancement of Microsurgery, and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand. It serves as a major venue for Canadian research, society guidelines, and continuing medical education.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信