Comparison of airway collapsibility following single induction dose ketamine with propofol versus propofol sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: A randomised controlled study.

IF 2.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-29 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_287_23
Pooja Bhardwaj, Sakthirajan Panneerselvam, Priya Rudingwa, Kirthiha Govindaraj, M V S Satya Prakash, Ashok S Badhe, Krishnan Nagarajan
{"title":"Comparison of airway collapsibility following single induction dose ketamine with propofol versus propofol sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: A randomised controlled study.","authors":"Pooja Bhardwaj, Sakthirajan Panneerselvam, Priya Rudingwa, Kirthiha Govindaraj, M V S Satya Prakash, Ashok S Badhe, Krishnan Nagarajan","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_287_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Adequate sedation is essential for children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) console. Propofol is commonly used for sedation, but it has the drawback of upper airway collapse at higher doses, which may be overcome by ketamine. This study was designed to evaluate the beneficial effect of ketamine on propofol in preventing airway collapse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-eight children undergoing MRI were randomised to Group P (propofol bolus dose followed by infusion or Group KP (bolus dose of ketamine and propofol followed by propofol infusion). The primary aim is to compare the upper airway cross-sectional area (CSA) and diameters (transverse diameter [TD] and anteroposterior diameter [APD]) obtained from MRI during inspiration and expiration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upper airway collapse as measured by delta CSA in mean (SD) [95% confidence interval] was statistically more significant between the two groups [at the soft palate level, 16.9 mm<sup>2</sup> (19.8) [9.3-24.4] versus 9.0 mm<sup>2</sup> (5.50) [6.9-11.1] (<i>P</i> = 0.043); at the base of the tongue level, 15.4 mm<sup>2</sup> (11.03) [11.2-19.6] versus 7.48 mm<sup>2</sup> (4.83) [5.64-9.32] (<i>P</i> < 0.001); at the epiglottis level, 23.9 (26.05) [14.0-33.8] versus 10.9 mm<sup>2</sup> (9.47) [7.35-14.5] (<i>P</i> = 0.014)]. A significant difference was obtained for TD at all levels and for APD at the soft palate and base of tongue level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adding a single dose of ketamine to propofol reduced the upper airway collapse significantly, as evidenced by the MRI-based measurements of upper airway dimensions, compared to propofol alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"68 2","pages":"189-195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10903778/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_287_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Adequate sedation is essential for children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) console. Propofol is commonly used for sedation, but it has the drawback of upper airway collapse at higher doses, which may be overcome by ketamine. This study was designed to evaluate the beneficial effect of ketamine on propofol in preventing airway collapse.

Methods: Fifty-eight children undergoing MRI were randomised to Group P (propofol bolus dose followed by infusion or Group KP (bolus dose of ketamine and propofol followed by propofol infusion). The primary aim is to compare the upper airway cross-sectional area (CSA) and diameters (transverse diameter [TD] and anteroposterior diameter [APD]) obtained from MRI during inspiration and expiration.

Results: Upper airway collapse as measured by delta CSA in mean (SD) [95% confidence interval] was statistically more significant between the two groups [at the soft palate level, 16.9 mm2 (19.8) [9.3-24.4] versus 9.0 mm2 (5.50) [6.9-11.1] (P = 0.043); at the base of the tongue level, 15.4 mm2 (11.03) [11.2-19.6] versus 7.48 mm2 (4.83) [5.64-9.32] (P < 0.001); at the epiglottis level, 23.9 (26.05) [14.0-33.8] versus 10.9 mm2 (9.47) [7.35-14.5] (P = 0.014)]. A significant difference was obtained for TD at all levels and for APD at the soft palate and base of tongue level.

Conclusion: Adding a single dose of ketamine to propofol reduced the upper airway collapse significantly, as evidenced by the MRI-based measurements of upper airway dimensions, compared to propofol alone.

对接受磁共振成像检查的儿童进行单次诱导剂量氯胺酮加丙泊酚与丙泊酚镇静后气道塌陷性的比较:随机对照研究。
背景和目的:充分的镇静对接受磁共振成像(MRI)检查的儿童至关重要。丙泊酚是常用的镇静剂,但其缺点是剂量较大时会导致上气道塌陷,而氯胺酮可以克服这一缺点。本研究旨在评估氯胺酮在防止气道塌陷方面对丙泊酚的有利影响:58名接受核磁共振成像检查的儿童被随机分配到P组(丙泊酚栓剂后输注)或KP组(氯胺酮和丙泊酚栓剂后丙泊酚输注)。主要目的是比较吸气和呼气时核磁共振成像获得的上气道横截面积(CSA)和直径(横径[TD]和前胸径[APD]):以平均值(标清)[95% 置信区间]的 delta CSA 测量的上气道塌陷在两组之间具有更显著的统计学差异[在软腭水平,16.9 平方毫米(19.8)[9.3-24.4]对 9.0 平方毫米(5.50)[6.9-11.1](P = 0.04)。1] (P = 0.043);舌根水平,15.4 mm2 (11.03) [11.2-19.6] 对 7.48 mm2 (4.83) [5.64-9.32] (P < 0.001);会厌水平,23.9 (26.05) [14.0-33.8] 对 10.9 mm2 (9.47) [7.35-14.5] (P = 0.014)]。所有水平的TD以及软腭和舌根水平的APD均有明显差异:结论:与单独使用异丙酚相比,在异丙酚中加入单剂量氯胺酮可显著减少上气道塌陷,这一点已通过基于磁共振成像的上气道尺寸测量得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信