Determinants of non-diabetic kidney diseases in type 2 diabetic patients: Twenty years of single center experience.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Tamer Sakaci, Elbis Ahbap, Taner Basturk, Mustafa Ortaboz, Ayse Aysim Ozagari, Emrah Erkan Mazı, Kamile Gulcin Eken, Nuri Baris Hasbal, Abdulkadir Unsal
{"title":"Determinants of non-diabetic kidney diseases in type 2 diabetic patients: Twenty years of single center experience.","authors":"Tamer Sakaci, Elbis Ahbap, Taner Basturk, Mustafa Ortaboz, Ayse Aysim Ozagari, Emrah Erkan Mazı, Kamile Gulcin Eken, Nuri Baris Hasbal, Abdulkadir Unsal","doi":"10.5414/CN111093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic nephropathy is one of the most common complications associated with diabetes. However, non-diabetic kidney disease has been reported in patients with type 2 diabetes at varying incidence rates. The objective of our study is to investigate the occurrence, clinicopathological characteristics, and inflammatory markers linked to diabetic and non-diabetic nephropathy (NDN) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Additionally, we aimed to explore the possibility of identifying non-diabetic pathology using different biopsy indications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 159 patients with type 2 DM who underwent renal biopsy at a tertiary care nephrology clinic between January 2000 and January 2022 were enrolled in the study. We collected comprehensive data, including patient demographics, co-morbidities, diabetes duration, renal biopsy indications and results, serological markers, renal function, diabetic retinopathy (DRP), full blood count, blood biochemistry, urinalysis, and inflammatory markers. Patients were categorized based on their biopsy indications, and their biopsy results were classified into three groups: isolated NDN, isolated diabetic nephropathy (DN), and mixed nephropathy with concurrent NDN. We evaluated the relationship between biopsy indications and accompanying pathologies and statistically assessed the likelihood of each biopsy indication detecting non-diabetic renal pathology. Additionally, differences in other data, including demographic and laboratory results and medical histories, among the three groups were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most frequent indication of renal biopsy was atypical presentations of nephrotic syndrome or nephrotic range proteinuria (ANS/ANP) in 25.1% of patients. Other indications included unexplained renal failure (URF) in 22.6%, atypical presentations of non-nephrotic range proteinuria (ANNP) in 18.2%, acute kidney injury or rapidly progressive kidney dysfunction (AKI/RPKD) in 16.9%, microscopic hematuria in 15.7%, URF with ANNP in 11.3%, and severe nephrotic range proteinuria (SNP) in 9.4%. Renal biopsy revealed isolated NDN in 64.8%, DN in 25.1%, and mixed nephropathy in 10.1% of patients. Primary glomerular diseases were the main non-diabetic renal pathology, predominantly focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) (36.4%) followed by MN (10.6%) and IgA nephropathy (7.5%). In comparison with the isolated DN and mixed nephropathy groups, patients in the isolated NDN group had significantly shorter diabetes duration, fewer DRP, as well as lower serum creatinine and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that presence of hematuria (OR 4.40; 95% CI 1.34 - 14.46, p = 0.014), acute nephrotic range proteinuria (OR 11.93; 95% CI 1.56 - 90.77, p = 0.017), and AKI/APKD (OR 41.08; 95% CI 3.40 - 495.39, p = 0.003) were strong predictors of NDN. Lower NLR (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.60 - 0.98, p = 0.035), shorter duration of diabetes (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.84 - 0.97, p = 0.010), and absence of DRP (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.12 - 0.98, p = 0.046) were also found to be independent indicators of NDN. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis revealed a cut-off value of ≤ 3.01 for NLR (sensitivity of 63.1%, specificity of 63.5%) with regards to predicting non-diabetic renal pathology (p = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Renal biopsy findings in patients with type 2 DM highlight that the prevalence of NDN may be higher than assumed, as presented mainly in the form of primary glomerular disease. The presence of AKI/RPKD, hematuria, and ANS/ANP serves as a reliable indicator of non-diabetic renal pathology. In more ambiguous situations, factors such as a shorter duration of diabetes, absence of DRP, and a lower NLR value may assist clinicians in biopsy decision.</p>","PeriodicalId":10396,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"207-221"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/CN111093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetic nephropathy is one of the most common complications associated with diabetes. However, non-diabetic kidney disease has been reported in patients with type 2 diabetes at varying incidence rates. The objective of our study is to investigate the occurrence, clinicopathological characteristics, and inflammatory markers linked to diabetic and non-diabetic nephropathy (NDN) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Additionally, we aimed to explore the possibility of identifying non-diabetic pathology using different biopsy indications.

Materials and methods: A total of 159 patients with type 2 DM who underwent renal biopsy at a tertiary care nephrology clinic between January 2000 and January 2022 were enrolled in the study. We collected comprehensive data, including patient demographics, co-morbidities, diabetes duration, renal biopsy indications and results, serological markers, renal function, diabetic retinopathy (DRP), full blood count, blood biochemistry, urinalysis, and inflammatory markers. Patients were categorized based on their biopsy indications, and their biopsy results were classified into three groups: isolated NDN, isolated diabetic nephropathy (DN), and mixed nephropathy with concurrent NDN. We evaluated the relationship between biopsy indications and accompanying pathologies and statistically assessed the likelihood of each biopsy indication detecting non-diabetic renal pathology. Additionally, differences in other data, including demographic and laboratory results and medical histories, among the three groups were investigated.

Results: The most frequent indication of renal biopsy was atypical presentations of nephrotic syndrome or nephrotic range proteinuria (ANS/ANP) in 25.1% of patients. Other indications included unexplained renal failure (URF) in 22.6%, atypical presentations of non-nephrotic range proteinuria (ANNP) in 18.2%, acute kidney injury or rapidly progressive kidney dysfunction (AKI/RPKD) in 16.9%, microscopic hematuria in 15.7%, URF with ANNP in 11.3%, and severe nephrotic range proteinuria (SNP) in 9.4%. Renal biopsy revealed isolated NDN in 64.8%, DN in 25.1%, and mixed nephropathy in 10.1% of patients. Primary glomerular diseases were the main non-diabetic renal pathology, predominantly focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) (36.4%) followed by MN (10.6%) and IgA nephropathy (7.5%). In comparison with the isolated DN and mixed nephropathy groups, patients in the isolated NDN group had significantly shorter diabetes duration, fewer DRP, as well as lower serum creatinine and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that presence of hematuria (OR 4.40; 95% CI 1.34 - 14.46, p = 0.014), acute nephrotic range proteinuria (OR 11.93; 95% CI 1.56 - 90.77, p = 0.017), and AKI/APKD (OR 41.08; 95% CI 3.40 - 495.39, p = 0.003) were strong predictors of NDN. Lower NLR (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.60 - 0.98, p = 0.035), shorter duration of diabetes (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.84 - 0.97, p = 0.010), and absence of DRP (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.12 - 0.98, p = 0.046) were also found to be independent indicators of NDN. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis revealed a cut-off value of ≤ 3.01 for NLR (sensitivity of 63.1%, specificity of 63.5%) with regards to predicting non-diabetic renal pathology (p = 0.006).

Conclusion: Renal biopsy findings in patients with type 2 DM highlight that the prevalence of NDN may be higher than assumed, as presented mainly in the form of primary glomerular disease. The presence of AKI/RPKD, hematuria, and ANS/ANP serves as a reliable indicator of non-diabetic renal pathology. In more ambiguous situations, factors such as a shorter duration of diabetes, absence of DRP, and a lower NLR value may assist clinicians in biopsy decision.

2 型糖尿病患者非糖尿病肾脏疾病的决定因素:二十年的单中心经验
背景:糖尿病肾病是糖尿病最常见的并发症之一。然而,在 2 型糖尿病患者中也有非糖尿病肾病的报道,其发病率各不相同。我们的研究旨在调查 2 型糖尿病(DM)患者中糖尿病肾病和非糖尿病肾病(NDN)的发生率、临床病理特征以及与之相关的炎症标志物。此外,我们还旨在探索利用不同活检适应症识别非糖尿病病变的可能性:2000年1月至2022年1月期间,共有159名2型糖尿病患者在一家三级医院肾内科诊所接受了肾活检。我们收集了全面的数据,包括患者人口统计学特征、合并疾病、糖尿病病程、肾活检适应症和结果、血清学标志物、肾功能、糖尿病视网膜病变(DRP)、全血细胞计数、血液生化、尿液分析和炎症标志物。根据活检适应症对患者进行分类,并将活检结果分为三组:孤立的 NDN、孤立的糖尿病肾病(DN)和并发 NDN 的混合肾病。我们评估了活检适应症与伴随病理之间的关系,并对每种活检适应症检测到非糖尿病肾脏病理的可能性进行了统计评估。此外,还调查了三组患者在人口统计学、实验室结果和病史等其他数据方面的差异:结果:最常见的肾活检适应症是非典型性肾病综合征或肾病范围蛋白尿(ANS/ANP),占患者总数的25.1%。其他适应症包括:22.6%的患者出现原因不明的肾衰竭(URF),18.2%的患者出现非肾病范围蛋白尿(ANNP)的不典型表现,16.9%的患者出现急性肾损伤或快速进展性肾功能障碍(AKI/RPKD),15.7%的患者出现镜下血尿,11.3%的患者出现URF合并ANNP,9.4%的患者出现严重肾病范围蛋白尿(SNP)。肾活检结果显示,64.8%的患者患有孤立的NDN,25.1%的患者患有DN,10.1%的患者患有混合性肾病。原发性肾小球疾病是主要的非糖尿病肾脏病变,主要是局灶节段性肾小球硬化症(FSGS)(36.4%),其次是MN(10.6%)和IgA肾病(7.5%)。与孤立的 DN 和混合肾病组相比,孤立的 NDN 组患者的糖尿病病程明显更短、DRP 更少、血清肌酐和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)更低。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,血尿(OR 4.40;95% CI 1.34 - 14.46,p = 0.014)、急性肾炎范围蛋白尿(OR 11.93;95% CI 1.56 - 90.77,p = 0.017)和 AKI/APKD (OR 41.08;95% CI 3.40 - 495.39,p = 0.003)是 NDN 的有力预测因素。较低的 NLR(OR 0.77;95% CI 0.60 - 0.98,p = 0.035)、较短的糖尿病病程(OR 0.90;95% CI 0.84 - 0.97,p = 0.010)和无 DRP(OR 0.35;95% CI 0.12 - 0.98,p = 0.046)也是 NDN 的独立指标。接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)分析显示,NLR 的临界值≤ 3.01(灵敏度为 63.1%,特异性为 63.5%)可预测非糖尿病肾脏病变(p = 0.006):结论:2 型糖尿病患者的肾活检结果表明,非糖尿病肾病的发病率可能比假定的要高,主要表现为原发性肾小球疾病。出现 AKI/RPKD、血尿和 ANS/ANP 可作为非糖尿病肾脏病变的可靠指标。在较为模糊的情况下,糖尿病病程较短、无 DRP 和较低的 NLR 值等因素可能有助于临床医生做出活检决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical nephrology
Clinical nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
138
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Nephrology appears monthly and publishes manuscripts containing original material with emphasis on the following topics: prophylaxis, pathophysiology, immunology, diagnosis, therapy, experimental approaches and dialysis and transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信