Disentangling semantic and prosodic features of English poetry

IF 0.7 3区 文学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Wenyi Shang, Ted Underwood
{"title":"Disentangling semantic and prosodic features of English poetry","authors":"Wenyi Shang, Ted Underwood","doi":"10.1093/llc/fqae008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The distinction between genre and form is still contested in literary studies. While scholars associated with the New Formalism are criticized for perceiving everything as a form, digital humanists tend to argue that everything is a genre. In this research, we employed machine learning models to classify 36,635 English poems in the Chadwyck-Healey Literature Collections into twenty-seven categories, focusing on their semantic features (lexicons) and prosodic features (meters and rhymes) independently. Our findings reveal that different categories of poetry are distinguished by different groups of characteristics, without a clear-cut division between those driven predominantly by semantic features and those driven predominantly by prosodic features. Instead, poetry categories manifest a combination of semantic and prosodic elements, spanning a spectrum of different strengths in both domains. These findings suggest that the colloquial distinction between “genre” and “form” is based on real differences between poetic categories, although those differences may not be quite as crisply binary as the vocabulary implies.","PeriodicalId":45315,"journal":{"name":"Digital Scholarship in the Humanities","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Scholarship in the Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqae008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The distinction between genre and form is still contested in literary studies. While scholars associated with the New Formalism are criticized for perceiving everything as a form, digital humanists tend to argue that everything is a genre. In this research, we employed machine learning models to classify 36,635 English poems in the Chadwyck-Healey Literature Collections into twenty-seven categories, focusing on their semantic features (lexicons) and prosodic features (meters and rhymes) independently. Our findings reveal that different categories of poetry are distinguished by different groups of characteristics, without a clear-cut division between those driven predominantly by semantic features and those driven predominantly by prosodic features. Instead, poetry categories manifest a combination of semantic and prosodic elements, spanning a spectrum of different strengths in both domains. These findings suggest that the colloquial distinction between “genre” and “form” is based on real differences between poetic categories, although those differences may not be quite as crisply binary as the vocabulary implies.
解构英语诗歌的语义和韵律特征
在文学研究中,体裁与形式之间的区别仍然存在争议。与新形式主义相关的学者被批评为将一切都视为形式,而数字人文主义者则倾向于认为一切都属于体裁。在这项研究中,我们采用机器学习模型将《Chadwyck-Healey 文学作品集》中的 36,635 首英文诗歌分为二十七个类别,分别关注其语义特征(词典)和韵律特征(节拍和韵律)。我们的研究结果表明,不同类别的诗歌由不同的特征组区分开来,并没有明确区分主要由语义特征驱动的诗歌类别和主要由韵律特征驱动的诗歌类别。相反,诗歌类别表现出语义和拟声元素的结合,在这两个领域都有不同的优势。这些研究结果表明,"体裁 "与 "形式 "之间的俗称区别是基于诗歌类别之间的实际差异,尽管这些差异可能并不像词汇所暗示的那样具有明确的二元性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: DSH or Digital Scholarship in the Humanities is an international, peer reviewed journal which publishes original contributions on all aspects of digital scholarship in the Humanities including, but not limited to, the field of what is currently called the Digital Humanities. Long and short papers report on theoretical, methodological, experimental, and applied research and include results of research projects, descriptions and evaluations of tools, techniques, and methodologies, and reports on work in progress. DSH also publishes reviews of books and resources. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities was previously known as Literary and Linguistic Computing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信