Writing Our Extinction: Anthropocene Fiction and Vertical Science by Patrick Whitmarsh (review)

IF 0.5 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Erin James
{"title":"Writing Our Extinction: Anthropocene Fiction and Vertical Science by Patrick Whitmarsh (review)","authors":"Erin James","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2024.a921065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Writing Our Extinction: Anthropocene Fiction and Vertical Science</em> by Patrick Whitmarsh <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Erin James </li> </ul> WHITMARSH, PATRICK. <em>Writing Our Extinction: Anthropocene Fiction and Vertical Science</em>. Stanford University Press, 2023. 209 pp. $80.00 hardcover; $26.00 paper. <p>In the opening pages of Patrick Whitmarsh’s <em>Writing Our Extinction</em>, native Greenlander Arnarulunnguaq stands atop a newly-built New York City skyscraper in 1924 and looks upon the city below. Bewildered, she puts to words the uncanny vision of humanity that this vertical perspective allows: “I see things more than my mind can grasp; and the only way to save oneself from madness is to suppose that we have all died suddenly before we know, and that this is part of another life” (3). For Whitmarsh, Arnarulunnguaq’s terror neatly summarizes the affordances of a vertical perspective: viewing the world—and ourselves— along the vertical plane, he argues, necessitates engaging with speculative understandings of the planet and the place of humans in it, as well as grappling with our own absence from it. The rest of Whitmarsh’s provocative and illuminating book fleshes out Arnarulunnguaq’s experience, reorienting post-WWII narrative fiction along an up-and-down axis. His survey foregrounds aerial representations of the earth from above and subterranean explorations of the earth from below and persuasively accounts for the way that this orientation illuminates increasing environmental precarity and anxieties about human extinction.</p> <p>In the titular “vertical science,” Whitmarsh refers to postwar-era advancements in air and space travel, resources extraction, and nuclear experimentation that we most clearly see in the decade spanning 1957–1958’s International Geophysical Year and the publication of the <em>Earthrise</em> photo ten years later. For Whitmarsh, the “vertical decade” not only ushers in radical scientific developments and their affiliated technological and militaristic projects, but also “a vertical thematics of cultural progress” (10). This vertical science, in turn, coordinates with a post-1960 Anthropocene fiction that offers readers “vertical perspectives on the planet, an increased attention to the ecological connectivity between human development and geophysical systems, and a sense of the earth as a script for humankind’s accelerating extinction” (11). By reconceptualizing “Anthropocene fictions” not as texts that feature explicit representations of the epoch or anthropogenic climate change but as those that foreground a vertical imagination, Whitmarsh nicely expands what novels we might place in this category. He argues that “Anthropocene fiction is not ostensibly about climate change at all,” but rather “works to focalize vertically the geophysical mesh in which climate change occurs and in which human actors conceptualize the sensitivity of their actions (or inaction)” (21). The corpus of texts that Whitmarsh organizes into Anthropocene fiction contains <strong>[End Page 112]</strong> familiar titles—Octavia Butler’s <em>Parable of the Sower</em> (1993), Kim Stanley Robinson’s <em>Red Mars</em> (1992)—as well as a host of new novels that greatly broaden the scope of this category, including Thomas Pynchon’s <em>Gravity’s Rainbow</em> (1973), Don DeLillo’s <em>Underworld</em> (1997), Colson Whitehead’s <em>The Intuitionist</em> (1999) and <em>The Underground Railroad</em> (2016), and Jesmyn Ward’s <em>Sing, Unburied, Sing</em> (2017), among others.</p> <p>The chapters in <em>Writing Our Extinction</em> revolve around key concepts that Whitmarsh introduces to illuminate the connections between vertical science and Anthropocene fictions. Chapter One focuses on <em>planetary realism</em>, or texts that render “strategies of realist and historical fiction...alongside descriptions of a strikingly nonhuman world” (33). Via a deep dive into DeLillo’s <em>Underworld</em>, this chapter also proposes the concept of <em>archival geology</em>, by which we can read the documentation of our species in geophysical verticalities—landfills, boreholes, orbital arcs, nuclear debris and fallout, and the underground vestiges of imperial genocide—as a means of grappling with time beyond human measure. In Chapter Two, Whitmarsh focuses not on the work of a single author but on a single (failed) scientific endeavor: Project Mohole, which in 1957 sought to investigate the hypothesized change in material composition between the earth’s crust and its mantle. Project Mohole offers Whitmarsh a unique set of parameters to lump together novels such as <em>Red Mars</em>, Reza Negarestani’s <em>Cyclonopedia: Complicity with Anonymous Materials</em> (2008), and Karen Tei Yamashita’s <em>Through the Arc of the Rain Forest</em> (1990), all of which he...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2024.a921065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Writing Our Extinction: Anthropocene Fiction and Vertical Science by Patrick Whitmarsh
  • Erin James
WHITMARSH, PATRICK. Writing Our Extinction: Anthropocene Fiction and Vertical Science. Stanford University Press, 2023. 209 pp. $80.00 hardcover; $26.00 paper.

In the opening pages of Patrick Whitmarsh’s Writing Our Extinction, native Greenlander Arnarulunnguaq stands atop a newly-built New York City skyscraper in 1924 and looks upon the city below. Bewildered, she puts to words the uncanny vision of humanity that this vertical perspective allows: “I see things more than my mind can grasp; and the only way to save oneself from madness is to suppose that we have all died suddenly before we know, and that this is part of another life” (3). For Whitmarsh, Arnarulunnguaq’s terror neatly summarizes the affordances of a vertical perspective: viewing the world—and ourselves— along the vertical plane, he argues, necessitates engaging with speculative understandings of the planet and the place of humans in it, as well as grappling with our own absence from it. The rest of Whitmarsh’s provocative and illuminating book fleshes out Arnarulunnguaq’s experience, reorienting post-WWII narrative fiction along an up-and-down axis. His survey foregrounds aerial representations of the earth from above and subterranean explorations of the earth from below and persuasively accounts for the way that this orientation illuminates increasing environmental precarity and anxieties about human extinction.

In the titular “vertical science,” Whitmarsh refers to postwar-era advancements in air and space travel, resources extraction, and nuclear experimentation that we most clearly see in the decade spanning 1957–1958’s International Geophysical Year and the publication of the Earthrise photo ten years later. For Whitmarsh, the “vertical decade” not only ushers in radical scientific developments and their affiliated technological and militaristic projects, but also “a vertical thematics of cultural progress” (10). This vertical science, in turn, coordinates with a post-1960 Anthropocene fiction that offers readers “vertical perspectives on the planet, an increased attention to the ecological connectivity between human development and geophysical systems, and a sense of the earth as a script for humankind’s accelerating extinction” (11). By reconceptualizing “Anthropocene fictions” not as texts that feature explicit representations of the epoch or anthropogenic climate change but as those that foreground a vertical imagination, Whitmarsh nicely expands what novels we might place in this category. He argues that “Anthropocene fiction is not ostensibly about climate change at all,” but rather “works to focalize vertically the geophysical mesh in which climate change occurs and in which human actors conceptualize the sensitivity of their actions (or inaction)” (21). The corpus of texts that Whitmarsh organizes into Anthropocene fiction contains [End Page 112] familiar titles—Octavia Butler’s Parable of the Sower (1993), Kim Stanley Robinson’s Red Mars (1992)—as well as a host of new novels that greatly broaden the scope of this category, including Thomas Pynchon’s Gravity’s Rainbow (1973), Don DeLillo’s Underworld (1997), Colson Whitehead’s The Intuitionist (1999) and The Underground Railroad (2016), and Jesmyn Ward’s Sing, Unburied, Sing (2017), among others.

The chapters in Writing Our Extinction revolve around key concepts that Whitmarsh introduces to illuminate the connections between vertical science and Anthropocene fictions. Chapter One focuses on planetary realism, or texts that render “strategies of realist and historical fiction...alongside descriptions of a strikingly nonhuman world” (33). Via a deep dive into DeLillo’s Underworld, this chapter also proposes the concept of archival geology, by which we can read the documentation of our species in geophysical verticalities—landfills, boreholes, orbital arcs, nuclear debris and fallout, and the underground vestiges of imperial genocide—as a means of grappling with time beyond human measure. In Chapter Two, Whitmarsh focuses not on the work of a single author but on a single (failed) scientific endeavor: Project Mohole, which in 1957 sought to investigate the hypothesized change in material composition between the earth’s crust and its mantle. Project Mohole offers Whitmarsh a unique set of parameters to lump together novels such as Red Mars, Reza Negarestani’s Cyclonopedia: Complicity with Anonymous Materials (2008), and Karen Tei Yamashita’s Through the Arc of the Rain Forest (1990), all of which he...

书写我们的灭绝:人类世小说与垂直科学》,作者 Patrick Whitmarsh(评论)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 书写我们的灭绝:帕特里克-惠特马什-艾琳-詹姆斯(Patrick Whitmarsh Erin James WHITMARSH, PATRICK.Writing Our Extinction:人类世小说与垂直科学》。斯坦福大学出版社,2023 年。209 pp.精装版80.00美元;纸质版26.00美元。在帕特里克-惠特马什(Patrick Whitmarsh)的《书写我们的灭绝》(Writing Our Extinction)一书的开篇,格陵兰土著阿纳鲁伦瓜克(Arnarulunnguaq)站在1924年纽约市新建的摩天大楼顶端,俯瞰着下方的城市。她困惑地用语言描述了这种垂直视角所带来的不可思议的人类视野:"我看到的东西超出了我的思维所能掌握的范围;唯一能让自己免于疯狂的办法就是假设我们都在不知不觉中突然死去,而这是另一种生活的一部分"(3)。在惠特马什看来,阿纳鲁伦瓜克的恐怖形象恰当地概括了垂直视角的优点:他认为,从垂直的角度来观察世界和我们自己,就必须对地球和人类在地球上的位置有一个推测性的理解,同时也要努力解决我们自身在地球上缺失的问题。惠特马什在这本极具启发性和启发性的著作中,对阿纳鲁伦瓜克的经历进行了充实,并沿着上下轴线对二战后的叙事小说进行了重新定位。他的研究侧重于从空中俯瞰地球和从地下探索地球,并令人信服地说明了这一方向如何揭示了日益严重的环境不稳定性和对人类灭绝的焦虑。在 "垂直科学 "这个标题中,惠特马什指的是战后在航空和航天旅行、资源开采和核实验方面取得的进步,我们在 1957-1958 国际地球物理年的十年间以及十年后地球升起照片的出版中最清楚地看到了这些进步。在惠特马什看来,"垂直十年 "不仅带来了激进的科学发展及其相关的技术和军事项目,还带来了 "文化进步的垂直主题"(10)。这种垂直科学反过来又与 1960 年后的 "人类世 "小说相协调,后者为读者提供了 "关于地球的垂直视角,更加关注人类发展与地球物理系统之间的生态联系,并将地球视为人类加速灭绝的剧本"(11)。通过重新认识 "人类世小说",惠特马什并没有将其视为明确表现这一时代或人为气候变化的文本,而是将其视为突出纵向想象力的文本,从而很好地扩展了我们可以将哪些小说归入这一类别。他认为,"人类世小说表面上根本不是关于气候变化的",而是 "致力于垂直聚焦气候变化发生的地球物理网状结构,以及人类行动者对其行动(或不行动)的敏感性的概念化"(21)。惠特玛什组织的 "人类世小说 "文库包含 [尾页112] 人们耳熟能详的作品--奥克塔维亚-巴特勒的《播种者的寓言》(1993)、金-斯坦利-罗宾逊的《红色火星》(1992)--以及大量大大拓宽了这一类别范围的新小说、包括托马斯-品钦(Thomas Pynchon)的《地心引力之虹》(1973 年)、唐-德里罗(Don DeLillo)的《地下世界》(1997 年)、科尔森-怀特海德(Colson Whitehead)的《直觉者》(1999 年)和《地下铁路》(2016 年),以及杰斯敏-沃德(Jesmyn Ward)的《歌唱吧,不埋没的,歌唱吧》(2017 年)等。书写我们的灭绝》中的各章围绕惠特马什提出的关键概念展开,阐明了垂直科学与人类世小说之间的联系。第一章重点讨论了行星现实主义,即 "在描述一个惊人的非人类世界的同时......呈现现实主义和历史小说策略 "的文本(33)。通过深入研究德里罗的《地下世界》,本章还提出了 "档案地质学 "的概念,通过这一概念,我们可以从地球物理的垂直性--填埋场、钻孔、轨道弧线、核碎片和核泄漏以及帝国种族灭绝的地下遗迹--中解读我们这个物种的记录,以此来应对人类无法测量的时间。在第二章中,惠特马什关注的不是某位作家的作品,而是一项(失败的)科学尝试:1957年,莫霍尔计划试图研究地壳和地幔之间物质成分变化的假设。莫霍尔计划为惠特马什提供了一套独特的参数,可以将《红色火星》、雷扎-内加雷斯塔尼的《旋风百科》等小说混为一谈:与匿名材料的共谋》(2008 年)和 Karen Tei Yamashita 的《穿过雨林的弧线》(1990 年)等小说,他都...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
STUDIES IN THE NOVEL
STUDIES IN THE NOVEL LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: From its inception, Studies in the Novel has been dedicated to building a scholarly community around the world-making potentialities of the novel. Studies in the Novel started as an idea among several members of the English Department of the University of North Texas during the summer of 1965. They determined that there was a need for a journal “devoted to publishing critical and scholarly articles on the novel with no restrictions on either chronology or nationality of the novelists studied.” The founding editor, University of North Texas professor of contemporary literature James W. Lee, envisioned a journal of international scope and influence. Since then, Studies in the Novel has staked its reputation upon publishing incisive scholarship on the canon-forming and cutting-edge novelists that have shaped the genre’s rich history. The journal continues to break new ground by promoting new theoretical approaches, a broader international scope, and an engagement with the contemporary novel as a form of social critique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信