The trade-off between density marker panels size and predictive ability of genomic prediction for agronomic traits in Coffea canephora

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Ithalo Coelho de Sousa, Cynthia Aparecida Valiati Barreto, Eveline Teixeira Caixeta, Ana Carolina Campana Nascimento, Camila Ferreira Azevedo, Emilly Ruas Alkimim, Moysés Nascimento
{"title":"The trade-off between density marker panels size and predictive ability of genomic prediction for agronomic traits in Coffea canephora","authors":"Ithalo Coelho de Sousa, Cynthia Aparecida Valiati Barreto, Eveline Teixeira Caixeta, Ana Carolina Campana Nascimento, Camila Ferreira Azevedo, Emilly Ruas Alkimim, Moysés Nascimento","doi":"10.1007/s10681-024-03303-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Genomic prediction in <i>Coffee</i> breeding has shown good potential in predictive ability (PA), genetic gains and reduction of the selection cycle time. It is known that the cost of genotyping was prohibitive for many species, and their value is associated with the density markers panel used. The use of optimize marker density panel may reduce the genotyping cost and improve the PA. We aimed to evaluate the trade-off between density marker panels size and the PA for eight agronomic traits in <i>Coffea canephora</i> using machine learning algorithms. These approaches were compared with BLASSO method. The used data consisted of 165 genotypes of <i>C. canephora</i> genotyped with 14,387 SNP markers. The plants were phenotyped for vegetative vigor (Vig), rust (Rus) and cercosporiose incidence (Cer), fruit maturation time (Mat), fruit size (FS), plant height (PH), diameter of the canopy projection (DC) and yield (Y). Twelve different density marker panels were used. The common trend observed in the analysis shows an increase of the PA as the number of markers decreases, having a peak when used between 500 and 1,000 markers. Comparing the best and the worse results (full SNP panel density) for each trait, some had an improvement around of 100% (PH: 0.35–0.77; Cer: 0.40–0.84; DC: 0.39–0.82; Rus: 0.39–0.83, Vig: 0.40–0.77), the other showed an improvement more than 340% (Mat: 0.12–0.60; Y: 0.14–0.61; FS: 0.07–0.60). The results of the current study indicate that the reduction of the number of markers can improve the selection of individuals at a lower cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":11803,"journal":{"name":"Euphytica","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Euphytica","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-024-03303-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genomic prediction in Coffee breeding has shown good potential in predictive ability (PA), genetic gains and reduction of the selection cycle time. It is known that the cost of genotyping was prohibitive for many species, and their value is associated with the density markers panel used. The use of optimize marker density panel may reduce the genotyping cost and improve the PA. We aimed to evaluate the trade-off between density marker panels size and the PA for eight agronomic traits in Coffea canephora using machine learning algorithms. These approaches were compared with BLASSO method. The used data consisted of 165 genotypes of C. canephora genotyped with 14,387 SNP markers. The plants were phenotyped for vegetative vigor (Vig), rust (Rus) and cercosporiose incidence (Cer), fruit maturation time (Mat), fruit size (FS), plant height (PH), diameter of the canopy projection (DC) and yield (Y). Twelve different density marker panels were used. The common trend observed in the analysis shows an increase of the PA as the number of markers decreases, having a peak when used between 500 and 1,000 markers. Comparing the best and the worse results (full SNP panel density) for each trait, some had an improvement around of 100% (PH: 0.35–0.77; Cer: 0.40–0.84; DC: 0.39–0.82; Rus: 0.39–0.83, Vig: 0.40–0.77), the other showed an improvement more than 340% (Mat: 0.12–0.60; Y: 0.14–0.61; FS: 0.07–0.60). The results of the current study indicate that the reduction of the number of markers can improve the selection of individuals at a lower cost.

Abstract Image

咖啡豆农艺性状基因组预测的密度标记面板大小与预测能力之间的权衡
咖啡育种中的基因组预测在预测能力(PA)、遗传增益和缩短选育周期方面显示出良好的潜力。众所周知,对许多物种来说,基因分型的成本过高,而且其价值与所使用的标记密度面板有关。使用优化的标记密度面板可降低基因分型成本并提高 PA。我们的目的是利用机器学习算法评估八种农艺性状的密度标记面板大小与 PA 之间的权衡。这些方法与 BLASSO 方法进行了比较。所使用的数据包括用 14,387 个 SNP 标记进行基因分型的 165 个 C. canephora 基因型。这些植株的表型包括无性系活力(Vig)、锈病(Rus)和孢子囊病发病率(Cer)、果实成熟时间(Mat)、果实大小(FS)、株高(PH)、冠突直径(DC)和产量(Y)。使用了 12 个不同的密度标记面板。分析中观察到的共同趋势表明,随着标记数量的减少,PA 值也在增加,在使用 500 到 1000 个标记时达到峰值。比较每个性状的最佳结果和最差结果(全 SNP 面板密度),有些性状的改进幅度在 100%左右(PH:0.35-0.77;Cer:0.40-0.84;DC:0.39-0.82;Rus:0.39-0.83;Vig:0.40-0.77),另一些则改善了 340% 以上(Mat:0.12-0.60;Y:0.14-0.61;FS:0.07-0.60)。目前的研究结果表明,减少标记物的数量可以以较低的成本改进个体的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Euphytica
Euphytica 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
157
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Euphytica is an international journal on theoretical and applied aspects of plant breeding. It publishes critical reviews and papers on the results of original research related to plant breeding. The integration of modern and traditional plant breeding is a growing field of research using transgenic crop plants and/or marker assisted breeding in combination with traditional breeding tools. The content should cover the interests of researchers directly or indirectly involved in plant breeding, at universities, breeding institutes, seed industries, plant biotech companies and industries using plant raw materials, and promote stability, adaptability and sustainability in agriculture and agro-industries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信