Exploring the viability of AI-aided genetic algorithms in estimating the crack repair rate of self-healing concrete

IF 3.6 4区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Qiong Tian, Yijun Lu, Ji Zhou, Shutong Song, Liming Yang, Tao Cheng, Jiandong Huang
{"title":"Exploring the viability of AI-aided genetic algorithms in estimating the crack repair rate of self-healing concrete","authors":"Qiong Tian, Yijun Lu, Ji Zhou, Shutong Song, Liming Yang, Tao Cheng, Jiandong Huang","doi":"10.1515/rams-2023-0179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a potential replacement for traditional concrete, which has cracking and poor durability issues, self-healing concrete (SHC) has been the research subject. However, conducting lab trials can be expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, machine learning (ML)-based predictions can aid improved formulations of self-healing concrete. The aim of this work is to develop ML models that could analyze and forecast the rate of healing of the cracked area (CrA) of bacteria- and fiber-containing SHC. These models were constructed using gene expression programming (GEP) and multi-expression programming (MEP) tools. The discrepancy between expected and desired results, statistical tests, Taylor’s diagram, and <jats:italic>R</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> values were additional metrics used to assess the constructed models. A SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach was used to evaluate which input attributes were highly relevant. With <jats:italic>R</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0.93, MAE = 0.047, MAPE = 12.60%, and RMSE = 0.062, the GEP produced somewhat worse predictions than the MEP (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0.93, MAE = 0.033, MAPE = 9.60%, and RMSE = 0.044). Bacteria had an indirect (negative) relationship with the CrA of SHC, while fiber had a direct (positive) association, according to the SHAP study. The SHAP study might help researchers and companies figure out how much of each raw material is needed for SHCs. Therefore, MEP and GEP models can be used to generate and test SHC compositions based on bacteria and polymeric fibers.","PeriodicalId":54484,"journal":{"name":"Reviews on Advanced Materials Science","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews on Advanced Materials Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rams-2023-0179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a potential replacement for traditional concrete, which has cracking and poor durability issues, self-healing concrete (SHC) has been the research subject. However, conducting lab trials can be expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, machine learning (ML)-based predictions can aid improved formulations of self-healing concrete. The aim of this work is to develop ML models that could analyze and forecast the rate of healing of the cracked area (CrA) of bacteria- and fiber-containing SHC. These models were constructed using gene expression programming (GEP) and multi-expression programming (MEP) tools. The discrepancy between expected and desired results, statistical tests, Taylor’s diagram, and R 2 values were additional metrics used to assess the constructed models. A SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach was used to evaluate which input attributes were highly relevant. With R 2 = 0.93, MAE = 0.047, MAPE = 12.60%, and RMSE = 0.062, the GEP produced somewhat worse predictions than the MEP (R 2 = 0.93, MAE = 0.033, MAPE = 9.60%, and RMSE = 0.044). Bacteria had an indirect (negative) relationship with the CrA of SHC, while fiber had a direct (positive) association, according to the SHAP study. The SHAP study might help researchers and companies figure out how much of each raw material is needed for SHCs. Therefore, MEP and GEP models can be used to generate and test SHC compositions based on bacteria and polymeric fibers.
探索人工智能辅助遗传算法在估算自愈合混凝土裂缝修复率方面的可行性
传统混凝土存在开裂和耐久性差等问题,作为传统混凝土的潜在替代品,自愈合混凝土(SHC)一直是研究课题。然而,进行实验室试验既昂贵又耗时。因此,基于机器学习(ML)的预测可以帮助改进自愈合混凝土的配方。这项工作的目的是开发 ML 模型,用于分析和预测含细菌和纤维的 SHC 裂缝区域(CrA)的愈合率。这些模型是利用基因表达编程(GEP)和多重表达编程(MEP)工具构建的。预期结果与理想结果之间的差异、统计测试、泰勒图和 R 2 值是用于评估所建模型的附加指标。采用了 SHapley Additive exPlanations(SHAP)方法来评估哪些输入属性具有高度相关性。R 2 = 0.93、MAE = 0.047、MAPE = 12.60%、RMSE = 0.062,GEP 的预测结果比 MEP(R 2 = 0.93、MAE = 0.033、MAPE = 9.60%、RMSE = 0.044)要差一些。SHAP研究表明,细菌与SHC的CrA有间接(负)关系,而纤维与SHC的CrA有直接(正)关系。SHAP 研究可能有助于研究人员和公司确定 SHC 所需的每种原材料的用量。因此,MEP 和 GEP 模型可用于生成和测试基于细菌和聚合纤维的 SHC 成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
43
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Reviews on Advanced Materials Science is a fully peer-reviewed, open access, electronic journal that publishes significant, original and relevant works in the area of theoretical and experimental studies of advanced materials. The journal provides the readers with free, instant, and permanent access to all content worldwide; and the authors with extensive promotion of published articles, long-time preservation, language-correction services, no space constraints and immediate publication. Reviews on Advanced Materials Science is listed inter alia by Clarivate Analytics (formerly Thomson Reuters) - Current Contents/Physical, Chemical, and Earth Sciences (CC/PC&ES), JCR and SCIE. Our standard policy requires each paper to be reviewed by at least two Referees and the peer-review process is single-blind.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信