Impact of Sling Use on Functional Mobility in a Geriatric Population.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sudarsan Murali, Mathew Hargreaves, Kyle Paul, John N Manfredi, Jun Kit He, Sean Young, Marshall Williams, Eugene Brabston, Brent Ponce, Amit Momaya
{"title":"Impact of Sling Use on Functional Mobility in a Geriatric Population.","authors":"Sudarsan Murali, Mathew Hargreaves, Kyle Paul, John N Manfredi, Jun Kit He, Sean Young, Marshall Williams, Eugene Brabston, Brent Ponce, Amit Momaya","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sling immobilization is commonly used following rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to determine the detrimental impact of sling usage on mobility and balance in an older adult population through validated gait and balance testing. The authors hypothesize that sling use will negatively affect balance and stability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This institutional review board-approved and registered randomized prospective clinical trial enrolled patients from 2019 to 2021. Following informed consent, patients were randomized into two groups: a sling worn (group 1) and no sling worn (group 2). Participants were assessed via the Edmonton Frail Scale as well as Tinetti gait and balance scoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients were included in the study, 23 (46%) men and 27 (54%) women, with a mean age of 72.2 years. The balance score median was 16.00 for participants not wearing a sling and 15.00 for participants wearing a sling. The gait score median was 12.00 for participants not wearing a sling and 11.50 for participants wearing a sling. The balance and gait scores were significantly greater when patients were not wearing a shoulder sling with <i>P</i> values of 0.006 and 0.011, respectively. The overall combined gait and balance score was significantly greater, with median values of 27.00 for participants not wearing a sling and 26.00 for participants wearing a sling (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Patients reported little to no anxiety about falling while wearing the sling, with a score of 0.16.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postoperative sling immobilization negatively affects balance and gait in the geriatric population, potentially increasing the risk of postoperative falls in an already at-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"117 3","pages":"145-149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001665","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Sling immobilization is commonly used following rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to determine the detrimental impact of sling usage on mobility and balance in an older adult population through validated gait and balance testing. The authors hypothesize that sling use will negatively affect balance and stability.

Methods: This institutional review board-approved and registered randomized prospective clinical trial enrolled patients from 2019 to 2021. Following informed consent, patients were randomized into two groups: a sling worn (group 1) and no sling worn (group 2). Participants were assessed via the Edmonton Frail Scale as well as Tinetti gait and balance scoring.

Results: Fifty patients were included in the study, 23 (46%) men and 27 (54%) women, with a mean age of 72.2 years. The balance score median was 16.00 for participants not wearing a sling and 15.00 for participants wearing a sling. The gait score median was 12.00 for participants not wearing a sling and 11.50 for participants wearing a sling. The balance and gait scores were significantly greater when patients were not wearing a shoulder sling with P values of 0.006 and 0.011, respectively. The overall combined gait and balance score was significantly greater, with median values of 27.00 for participants not wearing a sling and 26.00 for participants wearing a sling (P = 0.001). Patients reported little to no anxiety about falling while wearing the sling, with a score of 0.16.

Conclusions: Postoperative sling immobilization negatively affects balance and gait in the geriatric population, potentially increasing the risk of postoperative falls in an already at-risk population.

使用吊衣对老年人群功能移动能力的影响
目的:肩袖修复术后通常使用吊衣固定。本研究的目的是通过有效的步态和平衡测试,确定使用吊衣对老年人群的活动能力和平衡能力的不利影响。作者假设使用吊衣会对平衡和稳定性产生负面影响:这项经机构审查委员会批准和注册的随机前瞻性临床试验在 2019 年至 2021 年间招募患者。在获得知情同意后,患者被随机分为两组:穿戴吊衣组(第1组)和不穿戴吊衣组(第2组)。通过埃德蒙顿虚弱量表以及蒂内蒂步态和平衡评分对参与者进行评估:研究共纳入了 50 名患者,其中男性 23 人(占 46%),女性 27 人(占 54%),平均年龄为 72.2 岁。未穿戴吊衣者的平衡评分中位数为 16.00,穿戴吊衣者的平衡评分中位数为 15.00。未穿吊衣的参与者的步态得分中位数为 12.00,穿吊衣的参与者的步态得分中位数为 11.50。患者不穿肩部吊衣时的平衡和步态得分明显更高,P 值分别为 0.006 和 0.011。步态和平衡综合得分明显更高,未穿戴吊衣的参与者的中位值为 27.00,穿戴吊衣的参与者的中位值为 26.00(P = 0.001)。患者表示在穿戴吊衣时几乎没有跌倒焦虑,中位数为 0.16:术后吊衣固定会对老年患者的平衡和步态产生负面影响,可能会增加本已高危人群术后跌倒的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信