Associations between Present-on-Admission Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders and Short-Term Outcomes in Patients with Pneumonia.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Megan M Sheehan, Marya D Zilberberg, Peter K Lindenauer, Thomas L Higgins, Peter B Imrey, Ning Guo, Abhishek Deshpande, Sarah D Haessler, Michael B Rothberg
{"title":"Associations between Present-on-Admission Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders and Short-Term Outcomes in Patients with Pneumonia.","authors":"Megan M Sheehan, Marya D Zilberberg, Peter K Lindenauer, Thomas L Higgins, Peter B Imrey, Ning Guo, Abhishek Deshpande, Sarah D Haessler, Michael B Rothberg","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Do-not-resuscitate <b>(</b>DNR) orders are used to express patient preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This study examined whether early DNR orders are associated with differences in treatments and outcomes among patients hospitalized with pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of 768,015 adult patients hospitalized with pneumonia from 2010 to 2015 in 646 US hospitals. The exposure was DNR orders present on admission. Secondary analyses stratified patients by predicted in-hospital mortality. Main outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay, cost, intensive care admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, vasopressors, and dialysis initiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 768,015 patients, 94,155 (12.3%) had an early DNR order. Compared with those without, patients with DNR orders were older (mean age 80.1 ± 10.6 years vs 67.8 ± 16.4 years), with higher comorbidity burden, intensive care use (31.6% vs 30.6%), and in-hospital mortality (28.2% vs 8.5%). After adjustment via propensity score weighting, these patients had higher mortality (odds ratio [OR] 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.33-2.45) and lower use of intensive therapies such as vasopressors (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.81-0.85) and invasive mechanical ventilation (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.66-0.70). Although there was little relationship between predicted mortality and DNR orders, among those with highest predicted mortality, DNR orders were associated with lower intensive care use compared with those without (66.7% vs 80.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with early DNR orders have higher in-hospital mortality rates than those without, but often receive intensive care. These orders have the most impact on the care of patients with the highest mortality risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"117 3","pages":"165-171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10914325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001663","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders are used to express patient preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This study examined whether early DNR orders are associated with differences in treatments and outcomes among patients hospitalized with pneumonia.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 768,015 adult patients hospitalized with pneumonia from 2010 to 2015 in 646 US hospitals. The exposure was DNR orders present on admission. Secondary analyses stratified patients by predicted in-hospital mortality. Main outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay, cost, intensive care admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, vasopressors, and dialysis initiation.

Results: Of 768,015 patients, 94,155 (12.3%) had an early DNR order. Compared with those without, patients with DNR orders were older (mean age 80.1 ± 10.6 years vs 67.8 ± 16.4 years), with higher comorbidity burden, intensive care use (31.6% vs 30.6%), and in-hospital mortality (28.2% vs 8.5%). After adjustment via propensity score weighting, these patients had higher mortality (odds ratio [OR] 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.33-2.45) and lower use of intensive therapies such as vasopressors (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.81-0.85) and invasive mechanical ventilation (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.66-0.70). Although there was little relationship between predicted mortality and DNR orders, among those with highest predicted mortality, DNR orders were associated with lower intensive care use compared with those without (66.7% vs 80.8%).

Conclusions: Patients with early DNR orders have higher in-hospital mortality rates than those without, but often receive intensive care. These orders have the most impact on the care of patients with the highest mortality risk.

肺炎患者入院时的 "拒绝复苏 "指令与短期疗效之间的关系。
目的:拒绝复苏(DNR)指令用于表达患者对心肺复苏的偏好。本研究探讨了早期 DNR 命令是否与肺炎住院患者的治疗和预后差异有关:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是 2010 年至 2015 年期间在美国 646 家医院住院治疗的 768 015 名肺炎成年患者。研究对象为入院时存在DNR指令的患者。二次分析根据预测的院内死亡率对患者进行分层。主要结果包括院内死亡率、住院时间、费用、入院重症监护、有创机械通气、无创通气、血管加压和开始透析:在 768,015 名患者中,有 94,155 人(12.3%)下达了早期死亡宣告令。与无 DNR 命令的患者相比,有 DNR 命令的患者年龄更大(平均年龄为 80.1 ± 10.6 岁 vs 67.8 ± 16.4 岁),合并症负担更重,使用重症监护的比例更高(31.6% vs 30.6%),院内死亡率更高(28.2% vs 8.5%)。通过倾向评分加权调整后,这些患者的死亡率较高(几率比 [OR] 2.39,95% 置信区间 [CI] 2.33-2.45),而血管加压剂(OR 0.83,95% CI 0.81-0.85)和有创机械通气(OR 0.68,95% CI 0.66-0.70)等重症疗法的使用率较低。虽然预测死亡率与 DNR 命令之间的关系不大,但在预测死亡率最高的患者中,DNR 命令与较低的重症监护使用率相关(66.7% vs 80.8%):结论:与没有 DNR 命令的患者相比,有早期 DNR 命令的患者的院内死亡率更高,但他们通常会接受重症监护。这些指令对死亡率风险最高的患者的护理影响最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信