Edoxaban for the treatment of hypercoagulability and cerebral thromboembolism associated with cancer: A randomized clinical trial of biomarker targets.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
International Journal of Stroke Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1177/17474930241239266
Jong-Won Chung, Jaechun Hwang, Hyung Jun Kim, Woo-Keun Seo, Myung-Ju Ahn, Jeffrey L Saver, Oh Young Bang
{"title":"Edoxaban for the treatment of hypercoagulability and cerebral thromboembolism associated with cancer: A randomized clinical trial of biomarker targets.","authors":"Jong-Won Chung, Jaechun Hwang, Hyung Jun Kim, Woo-Keun Seo, Myung-Ju Ahn, Jeffrey L Saver, Oh Young Bang","doi":"10.1177/17474930241239266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed compare efficacy of edoxaban and enoxaparin upon biomarkers of hypercoagulability in patients with cancer-related embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this open-label, randomized, pilot trial, patients with cancer-related ESUS within 30 days of diagnosis were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive edoxaban (60 mg once daily) or enoxaparin (1 mg/kg twice daily) for 90 days. The primary endpoint was interval change of serum D-dimer level between days 0 and 7. The secondary endpoints were microembolic signals detected by transcranial Doppler at 7 and 90 days, the modified Rankin scale score, and stroke recurrence during 90 days. Safety outcomes included major bleeding and all-cause death at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 303 patients with ischemic stroke and cancer, 40 fully met enrollment criteria and were randomized. Baseline D-dimer levels were numerically higher in the edoxaban group (22.9 ± 15.9 μg/mL vs 16.9 ± 16.9 μg/mL). D-dimer level change (%) between days 0 and 7 was similar in the two groups (53.2 ± 25.7 vs 52.2 ± 52.0; <i>P</i> = 0.11). Microembolic signals were detected in 41.1% and 43.8% at baseline, 41.2% and 42.9% at day 7, and 25.0% and 28.6% at day 90 in the edoxaban and enoxaparin groups, respectively. Non-significantly higher major bleeding (35.0% vs 10.0%, <i>P</i> = 0.06) and 90-day mortality (40.0% vs 25.0%, <i>P</i> = 0.31) were noted in the edoxaban group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Edoxaban and enoxaparin were comparable with respect to the biomarkers of hypercoagulability and cerebral thromboembolism. Larger trials are warranted to compare effects of edoxaban and enoxaparin upon recurrent stroke and major bleeding in patients with cancer-related ESUS.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03570281 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03570281).</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241239266","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed compare efficacy of edoxaban and enoxaparin upon biomarkers of hypercoagulability in patients with cancer-related embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS).

Methods: In this open-label, randomized, pilot trial, patients with cancer-related ESUS within 30 days of diagnosis were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive edoxaban (60 mg once daily) or enoxaparin (1 mg/kg twice daily) for 90 days. The primary endpoint was interval change of serum D-dimer level between days 0 and 7. The secondary endpoints were microembolic signals detected by transcranial Doppler at 7 and 90 days, the modified Rankin scale score, and stroke recurrence during 90 days. Safety outcomes included major bleeding and all-cause death at 90 days.

Results: Of 303 patients with ischemic stroke and cancer, 40 fully met enrollment criteria and were randomized. Baseline D-dimer levels were numerically higher in the edoxaban group (22.9 ± 15.9 μg/mL vs 16.9 ± 16.9 μg/mL). D-dimer level change (%) between days 0 and 7 was similar in the two groups (53.2 ± 25.7 vs 52.2 ± 52.0; P = 0.11). Microembolic signals were detected in 41.1% and 43.8% at baseline, 41.2% and 42.9% at day 7, and 25.0% and 28.6% at day 90 in the edoxaban and enoxaparin groups, respectively. Non-significantly higher major bleeding (35.0% vs 10.0%, P = 0.06) and 90-day mortality (40.0% vs 25.0%, P = 0.31) were noted in the edoxaban group.

Conclusion: Edoxaban and enoxaparin were comparable with respect to the biomarkers of hypercoagulability and cerebral thromboembolism. Larger trials are warranted to compare effects of edoxaban and enoxaparin upon recurrent stroke and major bleeding in patients with cancer-related ESUS.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03570281 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03570281).

埃多沙班治疗癌症相关高凝状态和脑血栓栓塞:生物标志物靶点随机临床试验。
背景本研究旨在比较依多沙班和依诺肝素对癌症相关不明原因栓塞性卒中(ESUS)患者高凝状态生物标志物的疗效:在这项开放标签、随机试点试验中,确诊30天内的癌症相关ESUS患者被随机分配(1:1)接受依多沙班(60毫克,每天一次)或依诺肝素(1毫克/千克,每天两次)治疗90天。主要终点是第0天和第7天之间血清D-二聚体水平的间期变化。次要终点是经颅多普勒在 7 天和 90 天内检测到的微栓塞信号、修改后的 Rankin 量表评分以及 90 天内的中风复发率。安全性结果包括 90 天内的大出血和全因死亡:在303名缺血性中风和癌症患者中,有40人完全符合入组标准并被随机分组。依多沙班组的基线D-二聚体水平更高(22.9±15.9 vs. 16.9±16.9,μg/mL)。两组 D-二聚体水平在第 0 天和第 7 天之间的变化(%)相似(53.2±25.7 vs. 52.2±52.0;P=0.11)。依多沙班组和依诺肝素组分别有41.1%和43.8%的患者在基线、41.2%和42.9%的患者在第7天、25.0%和28.6%的患者在第90天检测到微栓塞信号。埃多沙班组的大出血率(35.0%对10.0%,P=0.06)和90天死亡率(40.0%对25.0%,P=0.31)显著高于依诺肝素组:结论:在高凝状态和脑血栓栓塞的生物标志物方面,埃多沙班和依诺肝素具有可比性。有必要进行更大规模的试验,以比较依度沙班和依诺肝素对癌症相关 ESUS 患者复发中风和大出血的影响:NCT03570281 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03570281)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Stroke
International Journal of Stroke 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信