Counting culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) children in Australian health research: Does it matter how we count?

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Razlyn Abdul Rahim , Rhiannon Pilkington , Katina D’Onise , Alicia Montgomerie , John Lynch
{"title":"Counting culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) children in Australian health research: Does it matter how we count?","authors":"Razlyn Abdul Rahim ,&nbsp;Rhiannon Pilkington ,&nbsp;Katina D’Onise ,&nbsp;Alicia Montgomerie ,&nbsp;John Lynch","doi":"10.1016/j.anzjph.2024.100129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe how culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) children are identified and enumerated in routine data collections and in child health research in Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Descriptive analysis, where different definitions of CALD were applied to the 2021 Australian Census to measure the size of the CALD population of Australian children aged 0 to 17 years. Narrative review of the Australian child health literature to examine how CALD children were defined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Applying various definitions to the 2021 Census, the estimated proportion of CALD children aged 0 to 17 ranged from 6.3% to 43%. The most commonly applied CALD indicators were language background other than English and being born overseas.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is no consensus on how CALD is defined in Australian child health research. Application of different CALD indicators can generate up to seven-fold differences in estimates of who counts as being a CALD child.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Public Health</h3><p>If we are to advance health and well-being equity for CALD children, we need a more consistent approach to understanding which children are counted as CALD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8620,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","volume":"48 2","pages":"Article 100129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000049/pdfft?md5=5ad600a4d548d073b118945aafa65b64&pid=1-s2.0-S1326020024000049-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To describe how culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) children are identified and enumerated in routine data collections and in child health research in Australia.

Methods

Descriptive analysis, where different definitions of CALD were applied to the 2021 Australian Census to measure the size of the CALD population of Australian children aged 0 to 17 years. Narrative review of the Australian child health literature to examine how CALD children were defined.

Results

Applying various definitions to the 2021 Census, the estimated proportion of CALD children aged 0 to 17 ranged from 6.3% to 43%. The most commonly applied CALD indicators were language background other than English and being born overseas.

Conclusions

There is no consensus on how CALD is defined in Australian child health research. Application of different CALD indicators can generate up to seven-fold differences in estimates of who counts as being a CALD child.

Implications for Public Health

If we are to advance health and well-being equity for CALD children, we need a more consistent approach to understanding which children are counted as CALD.

在澳大利亚健康研究中计算具有文化和语言多样性 (CALD) 的儿童:如何计算是否重要?
目的描述澳大利亚在常规数据收集和儿童健康研究中如何识别和统计具有文化和语言多样性(CALD)的儿童:描述性分析,在2021年澳大利亚人口普查中采用不同的CALD定义来衡量0至17岁澳大利亚儿童中CALD人口的规模。对澳大利亚儿童健康文献进行叙述性回顾,研究如何定义CALD儿童:将各种定义应用于 2021 年人口普查,0 至 17 岁 CALD 儿童的估计比例从 6.3% 到 43% 不等。最常用的 CALD 指标是英语以外的语言背景和海外出生:结论:在澳大利亚儿童健康研究中,对CALD的定义尚未达成共识。采用不同的 CALD 指标,对 CALD 儿童的估计值可产生高达七倍的差异:如果我们要促进CALD儿童的健康和福利公平,我们需要一种更加一致的方法来了解哪些儿童被算作CALD儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (ANZJPH) is concerned with public health issues. The research reported includes formal epidemiological inquiries into the correlates and causes of diseases and health-related behaviour, analyses of public policy affecting health and disease, and detailed studies of the cultures and social structures within which health and illness exist. The Journal is multidisciplinary and aims to publish methodologically sound research from any of the academic disciplines that constitute public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信