How liberals lost the public: Walter Lippmann, John Dewey, and the critique of “traditional democratic theory”

IF 1.3 2区文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION

Quarterly Journal of Speech Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1080/00335630.2024.2319119

Ned O’Gorman (he/him)

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the 1990s, rhetorical and communication studies have taken a strong turn toward multiplicity in publics scholarship. This turn has generally been understood as representing both a political a...

查看原文本刊更多论文

自由派是如何失去公众的？沃尔特-李普曼、约翰-杜威和对 "传统民主理论 "的批判

自 20 世纪 90 年代以来，修辞学和传播学研究在公共领域的学术研究中出现了强烈的多元性转向。人们普遍认为，这种转向既代表了政治上的多元性，也代表了传播学上的多元性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Quarterly Journal of Speech COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

36.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Quarterly Journal of Speech (QJS) publishes articles and book reviews of interest to those who take a rhetorical perspective on the texts, discourses, and cultural practices by which public beliefs and identities are constituted, empowered, and enacted. Rhetorical scholarship now cuts across many different intellectual, disciplinary, and political vectors, and QJS seeks to honor and address the interanimating effects of such differences. No single project, whether modern or postmodern in its orientation, or local, national, or global in its scope, can suffice as the sole locus of rhetorical practice, knowledge and understanding.