Digital writing with AI platforms: the role of fun with/in generative AI

Amy Stornaiuolo, Jennifer Higgs, Opal Jawale, Rhianne Mae Martin
{"title":"Digital writing with AI platforms: the role of fun with/in generative AI","authors":"Amy Stornaiuolo, Jennifer Higgs, Opal Jawale, Rhianne Mae Martin","doi":"10.1108/etpc-08-2023-0103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>With the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (AI), it is important to consider how young people are making sense of these tools in their everyday lives. Drawing on critical postdigital approaches to learning and literacy, this study aims to center the experiences and perspectives of young people who encounter and experiment with generative AI in their daily writing practices.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This critical case study of one digital platform – Character.ai – brings together an adolescent and adult authorship team to inquire about the intertwining of young people’s playful and critical perspectives when writing on/with digital platforms. Drawing on critical walkthrough methodology (Light <em>et al.</em>, 2018), the authors engage digital methods to study how the creative and “fun” uses of AI in youths’ writing lives are situated in broader platform ecologies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings suggest experimentation and pleasure are key aspects of young people’s engagement with generative AI. The authors demonstrate how one platform works to capitalize on these dimensions, even as youth users engage critically and artfully with the platform and develop their digital writing practices.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This study highlights how playful experimentation with generative AI can engage young people both in pleasurable digital writing and in exploration and contemplation of platforms dynamics and structures that shape their and others’ literate activities. Educators can consider young people’s creative uses of these evolving technologies as potential opportunities to develop a critical awareness of how commercial platforms seek to benefit from their users.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study contributes to the development of a critical and humanist research agenda around generative AI by centering the experiences, perspectives and practices of young people who are underrepresented in the burgeoning research devoted to AI and literacies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":501133,"journal":{"name":"English Teaching: Practice & Critique","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Teaching: Practice & Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-08-2023-0103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

With the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (AI), it is important to consider how young people are making sense of these tools in their everyday lives. Drawing on critical postdigital approaches to learning and literacy, this study aims to center the experiences and perspectives of young people who encounter and experiment with generative AI in their daily writing practices.

Design/methodology/approach

This critical case study of one digital platform – Character.ai – brings together an adolescent and adult authorship team to inquire about the intertwining of young people’s playful and critical perspectives when writing on/with digital platforms. Drawing on critical walkthrough methodology (Light et al., 2018), the authors engage digital methods to study how the creative and “fun” uses of AI in youths’ writing lives are situated in broader platform ecologies.

Findings

The findings suggest experimentation and pleasure are key aspects of young people’s engagement with generative AI. The authors demonstrate how one platform works to capitalize on these dimensions, even as youth users engage critically and artfully with the platform and develop their digital writing practices.

Practical implications

This study highlights how playful experimentation with generative AI can engage young people both in pleasurable digital writing and in exploration and contemplation of platforms dynamics and structures that shape their and others’ literate activities. Educators can consider young people’s creative uses of these evolving technologies as potential opportunities to develop a critical awareness of how commercial platforms seek to benefit from their users.

Originality/value

This study contributes to the development of a critical and humanist research agenda around generative AI by centering the experiences, perspectives and practices of young people who are underrepresented in the burgeoning research devoted to AI and literacies.

利用人工智能平台进行数字写作:趣味性在人工智能生成中的作用
目的随着生成式人工智能(AI)的快速发展,考虑年轻人在日常生活中如何理解这些工具非常重要。本研究以批判性的后数字化学习和识字方法为基础,旨在以在日常写作实践中遇到并尝试使用生成式人工智能的年轻人的经验和观点为中心。设计/方法/方法本研究对一个数字平台--Character.ai--进行了批判性案例研究,将青少年和成人作者团队聚集在一起,探究年轻人在数字平台上/使用数字平台写作时游戏性和批判性观点的交织。借鉴批判性演练方法(Light 等人,2018 年),作者采用数字方法研究了人工智能在青少年写作生活中的创造性和 "趣味 "使用是如何置身于更广泛的平台生态中的。研究结果研究结果表明,实验和愉悦是青少年参与生成性人工智能的关键方面。作者展示了一个平台如何利用这些方面,甚至在青少年用户以批判性和艺术性的方式参与平台并发展他们的数字写作实践时也是如此。这项研究强调了对生成式人工智能的游戏性实验如何既能让青少年参与愉悦的数字写作,又能让他们探索和思考平台的动态和结构,这些动态和结构塑造了他们和其他人的识字活动。教育工作者可以考虑将年轻人对这些不断发展的技术的创造性使用作为潜在的机会,培养他们对商业平台如何从其用户身上获益的批判意识。原创性/价值本研究以年轻人的经验、观点和实践为中心,促进了围绕生成式人工智能的批判性和人文主义研究议程的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信