Outcomes of endoscopic management of benign maxillary sinus lesions 5-year experience, non-randomized clinical trials

Mohamed Omar A. Gad, Ahmed Ali Ibrahim, Ahmed Abdel Aleem, Shimaa Ibrahim Mohamed
{"title":"Outcomes of endoscopic management of benign maxillary sinus lesions 5-year experience, non-randomized clinical trials","authors":"Mohamed Omar A. Gad, Ahmed Ali Ibrahim, Ahmed Abdel Aleem, Shimaa Ibrahim Mohamed","doi":"10.1186/s43163-024-00586-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When medical therapy fails to control maxillary sinus (MS) disease, surgery is required. There are many advanced MS endoscopic approaches, each one with its anatomical limitations and possible complications. This study aimed to review the outcomes of three endoscopic approaches to the MS (middle meatal antrostomy approach (MMAA), prelacrimal recess approach (PLRA), and canine fossa approach (CFA)) to manage benign MS lesions. Sixty-three patients with diseased MS require surgery. Endoscopic MS approaches used include MMAA, PLRA, and CFA. Each approach was used in 21 patients. The outcome of each approach was measured regarding lesion accessibility and clearance, complications (intraoperative or postoperative), and recurrence. The maxillary sinus posterior wall was accessible in all approaches. Other walls and different recesses were also accessible in the case of PLRA and CFA with statistically significant difference between the three approaches. There was no significant difference between patients operated by PLRA and CFA regarding accessibility to different walls and recesses of the MS. Endoscopic and radiological recurrence were found in three (15%) patients who were operated by MMAA. There was no evidence of recurrence in patients operated by the other approaches. Complications like crustations, fascial pain, fascial welling, and fascial hypoesthesia occurred in a few patients. By using a suitable endoscopic approach, the different walls and recesses of the MS were completely accessible, so benign MS lesions that required open surgical approaches can be managed endoscopically while preserving the sinus structure and function.","PeriodicalId":501131,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-024-00586-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When medical therapy fails to control maxillary sinus (MS) disease, surgery is required. There are many advanced MS endoscopic approaches, each one with its anatomical limitations and possible complications. This study aimed to review the outcomes of three endoscopic approaches to the MS (middle meatal antrostomy approach (MMAA), prelacrimal recess approach (PLRA), and canine fossa approach (CFA)) to manage benign MS lesions. Sixty-three patients with diseased MS require surgery. Endoscopic MS approaches used include MMAA, PLRA, and CFA. Each approach was used in 21 patients. The outcome of each approach was measured regarding lesion accessibility and clearance, complications (intraoperative or postoperative), and recurrence. The maxillary sinus posterior wall was accessible in all approaches. Other walls and different recesses were also accessible in the case of PLRA and CFA with statistically significant difference between the three approaches. There was no significant difference between patients operated by PLRA and CFA regarding accessibility to different walls and recesses of the MS. Endoscopic and radiological recurrence were found in three (15%) patients who were operated by MMAA. There was no evidence of recurrence in patients operated by the other approaches. Complications like crustations, fascial pain, fascial welling, and fascial hypoesthesia occurred in a few patients. By using a suitable endoscopic approach, the different walls and recesses of the MS were completely accessible, so benign MS lesions that required open surgical approaches can be managed endoscopically while preserving the sinus structure and function.
上颌窦良性病变的内窥镜治疗效果 5 年经验,非随机临床试验
当药物治疗无法控制上颌窦(MS)疾病时,就需要进行手术治疗。目前有许多先进的上颌窦内窥镜方法,每种方法都有其解剖局限性和可能出现的并发症。本研究旨在回顾上颌窦的三种内窥镜方法(肉中窦造口法(MMAA)、泪道前凹法(PLRA)和犬窝法(CFA))治疗上颌窦良性病变的效果。63名多发性硬化症患者需要手术治疗。使用的内窥镜 MS 方法包括 MMAA、PLRA 和 CFA。每种方法都用于 21 名患者。对每种方法的效果进行了测量,包括病变的可及性和清除、并发症(术中或术后)以及复发。所有方法均可进入上颌窦后壁。在PLRA和CFA手术中,其他壁和不同的凹陷也能被触及,三种方法之间的差异在统计学上有显著性。在上颌窦不同壁和凹陷的可及性方面,PLRA 和 CFA 手术患者之间没有明显差异。有三名(15%)通过 MMAA 手术的患者发现了内镜和放射学复发。采用其他方法手术的患者没有复发的迹象。少数患者出现了结痂、筋膜疼痛、筋膜充血和筋膜麻痹等并发症。通过使用合适的内窥镜方法,可以完全进入多发性硬化症的不同壁和凹陷处,因此需要开放手术方法的多发性硬化症良性病变可以通过内窥镜进行治疗,同时保留窦的结构和功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信