From performance to horizon: managements’ horizon and firms’ investment efficiency

IF 3.6 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Abongeh A. Tunyi, Geofry Areneke, Tanveer Hussain, Jacob Agyemang
{"title":"From performance to horizon: managements’ horizon and firms’ investment efficiency","authors":"Abongeh A. Tunyi, Geofry Areneke, Tanveer Hussain, Jacob Agyemang","doi":"10.1108/raf-11-2022-0319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study proposes a novel measure for management’s horizon (short-termism or myopia vs long-termism or hyperopia) derived from easily obtainable firm-level accounting and stock market performance data. The authors use the measure to explore the impact of managements’ horizon on firms’ investment efficiency.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors rely on two commonly used but uncorrelated measures of management performance: accounting performance (return on capital employed, ROCE) and stock market performance (average abnormal return, AAR). The authors combine these measures to develop a multidimensional framework for performance, which classifies firms into four groups: efficient (high accounting and high market performance), poor (low accounting and low market performance), myopic (high accounting and low market performance) and hyperopic (low accounting and high market performance). The authors validate this framework and deploy it to explore the relationship between horizon and firms’ investment efficiency.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>In validation tests, the authors show that management myopia (hyperopia) explains firms’ decision to cut (grow) research and development investments. Further, as expected, myopic (hyperopic) firms are associated with significantly more (less) accrual and real earnings management. The empirical tests on the link between horizon and investment efficiency suggest that myopic managers cut new investments while their hyperopic counterparts grow the same. Ultimately, the authors find that myopia (hyperopia) exacerbates(mitigates) the over-investment of free cash flow problem.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The authors introduce a framework for assessing management’s horizon using easily obtainable measures of performance. The framework explains inconsistencies in prior empirical research using different measures of performance (accounting versus market). The authors demonstrate its utility by showing that the measure explains decisions around research and development investment, earnings management and firm investments.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":21152,"journal":{"name":"Review of Accounting and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/raf-11-2022-0319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study proposes a novel measure for management’s horizon (short-termism or myopia vs long-termism or hyperopia) derived from easily obtainable firm-level accounting and stock market performance data. The authors use the measure to explore the impact of managements’ horizon on firms’ investment efficiency.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors rely on two commonly used but uncorrelated measures of management performance: accounting performance (return on capital employed, ROCE) and stock market performance (average abnormal return, AAR). The authors combine these measures to develop a multidimensional framework for performance, which classifies firms into four groups: efficient (high accounting and high market performance), poor (low accounting and low market performance), myopic (high accounting and low market performance) and hyperopic (low accounting and high market performance). The authors validate this framework and deploy it to explore the relationship between horizon and firms’ investment efficiency.

Findings

In validation tests, the authors show that management myopia (hyperopia) explains firms’ decision to cut (grow) research and development investments. Further, as expected, myopic (hyperopic) firms are associated with significantly more (less) accrual and real earnings management. The empirical tests on the link between horizon and investment efficiency suggest that myopic managers cut new investments while their hyperopic counterparts grow the same. Ultimately, the authors find that myopia (hyperopia) exacerbates(mitigates) the over-investment of free cash flow problem.

Originality/value

The authors introduce a framework for assessing management’s horizon using easily obtainable measures of performance. The framework explains inconsistencies in prior empirical research using different measures of performance (accounting versus market). The authors demonstrate its utility by showing that the measure explains decisions around research and development investment, earnings management and firm investments.

从业绩到视野:管理层的视野与公司的投资效率
目的本研究提出了一种新的衡量管理层视野的方法(短期主义或近视与长期主义或远视),该方法源自易于获取的公司级会计和股票市场绩效数据。设计/方法/途径 作者利用两种常用但不相关的管理绩效衡量方法:会计绩效(资本回报率,ROCE)和股票市场绩效(平均异常回报率,AAR)。作者将这些指标结合起来,建立了一个多维绩效框架,将企业分为四类:高效(高会计绩效和高市场绩效)、低效(低会计绩效和低市场绩效)、近视(高会计绩效和低市场绩效)和远视(低会计绩效和高市场绩效)。作者对这一框架进行了验证,并将其用于探索视野与企业投资效率之间的关系。研究结果在验证测试中,作者发现管理层近视(远视)可以解释企业削减(增加)研发投资的决策。此外,正如预期的那样,近视(远视)企业与显著增加(减少)权责发生制和实际收益管理有关。对眼界与投资效率之间联系的实证检验表明,近视的管理者会削减新投资,而远视的管理者则会增加新投资。作者最终发现,近视(远视)会加剧(缓解)自由现金流过度投资的问题。该框架解释了之前使用不同业绩衡量标准(会计与市场)的实证研究中存在的不一致之处。作者通过证明该衡量标准可以解释研发投资、收益管理和公司投资方面的决策,从而证明了该框架的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信