Translation and adaptation of Shared Care Instrument-Revised for the older adults and their caregivers in Taiwan

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Mei-Hui Wu , Tzu-Chi Lee , Shu-Yuan Lin , Ching-Huey Chen , Ching-Min Chen , Fan-Hao Chou
{"title":"Translation and adaptation of Shared Care Instrument-Revised for the older adults and their caregivers in Taiwan","authors":"Mei-Hui Wu ,&nbsp;Tzu-Chi Lee ,&nbsp;Shu-Yuan Lin ,&nbsp;Ching-Huey Chen ,&nbsp;Ching-Min Chen ,&nbsp;Fan-Hao Chou","doi":"10.1016/j.apnr.2024.151771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The aging population in Taiwan has resulted in an increase in the dependent population and the care load on caregivers. Shared care is an interpersonal process in which support is “traded” to “handle” chronic illnesses by home-care patients and family caregivers. The scale of shared care has received little attention in the Taiwanese cultural context. Thus, this study examined the reliability and validity of the Taiwanese versions of Shared Care Instrument-Revised (SCI-R).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The content validity, construct validity, and discriminant validity were used to test the validity of the translated questionnaires. The Cronbach's α was used to examine reliability. A total of 500 older adults and their caregivers were recruited from three counties in Taiwan.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the scale were within the acceptable range. The Cronbach's α was between 0.838 and 0.95. However, the scale's reliability was higher than that of the original version. This might be because of the inclusion of participants with less severe diseases than the participants in the original study, high social expectations in the Chinese traditional culture, and a large number of similar items. Future research should simplify the items and consider adopting diverse participant selection criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of this study can be used to understand shared care in Taiwan.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50740,"journal":{"name":"Applied Nursing Research","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 151771"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0897189724000090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The aging population in Taiwan has resulted in an increase in the dependent population and the care load on caregivers. Shared care is an interpersonal process in which support is “traded” to “handle” chronic illnesses by home-care patients and family caregivers. The scale of shared care has received little attention in the Taiwanese cultural context. Thus, this study examined the reliability and validity of the Taiwanese versions of Shared Care Instrument-Revised (SCI-R).

Methods

The content validity, construct validity, and discriminant validity were used to test the validity of the translated questionnaires. The Cronbach's α was used to examine reliability. A total of 500 older adults and their caregivers were recruited from three counties in Taiwan.

Results

The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the scale were within the acceptable range. The Cronbach's α was between 0.838 and 0.95. However, the scale's reliability was higher than that of the original version. This might be because of the inclusion of participants with less severe diseases than the participants in the original study, high social expectations in the Chinese traditional culture, and a large number of similar items. Future research should simplify the items and consider adopting diverse participant selection criteria.

Conclusions

The results of this study can be used to understand shared care in Taiwan.

为台湾老年人及其照顾者翻译和改编《共同照顾工具-修订版
台湾人口老龄化导致受扶养人口和照顾者的照顾负担增加。共同照护是一个人际交往的过程,在这个过程中,家庭照护病人和家庭照护者通过 "交换 "支持来 "处理 "慢性疾病。在台湾文化背景下,共同照护的量表很少受到关注。因此,本研究考察了台湾版共享护理量表(SCI-R)的信度和效度。研究采用了内容效度、建构效度和判别效度来检验翻译问卷的有效性。信度采用 Cronbach's α 进行检验。从台湾三个县市共招募了 500 名老年人及其护理人员。中文版量表的信度和效度均在可接受范围内。Cronbach's α介于 0.838 和 0.95 之间。不过,该量表的信度高于原版量表。这可能是由于纳入了比原研究中病情较轻的参与者、中国传统文化中较高的社会期望以及大量的相似项目。未来的研究应简化项目,并考虑采用多样化的参与者选择标准。本研究的结果可用于了解台湾的共享护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Nursing Research
Applied Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Applied Nursing Research presents original, peer-reviewed research findings clearly and directly for clinical applications in all nursing specialties. Regular features include "Ask the Experts," research briefs, clinical methods, book reviews, news and announcements, and an editorial section. Applied Nursing Research covers such areas as pain management, patient education, discharge planning, nursing diagnosis, job stress in nursing, nursing influence on length of hospital stay, and nurse/physician collaboration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信