Call Me Dr. Ishmael: Trends in Electronic Health Record Notes Available at ED Visits and Admissions

Brian W Patterson, Daniel J Hekman, Frank Liao, Azita Hamedani, Manish N Shah, Majid Afshar
{"title":"Call Me Dr. Ishmael: Trends in Electronic Health Record Notes Available at ED Visits and Admissions","authors":"Brian W Patterson, Daniel J Hekman, Frank Liao, Azita Hamedani, Manish N Shah, Majid Afshar","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.23.24303213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Numerous studies have identified information overload as a key issue for electronic health records (EHRs). This study describes the amount of text data across all notes available to emergency physicians in the EHR, trended over the time since EHR establishment. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of EHR data from a large healthcare system, examining the number of notes and corresponding number of total words and total tokens across all notes available to physicians during patient encounters in the emergency department (ED). We assessed the change in these metrics over a 17-year period between 2006 and 2023.\nResults: The study cohort included 730,968 ED visits made by 293,559 unique patients and a total note count of 132,574,964. The median note count for all encounters in 2006 was 7 (IQR: 3 - 18), accounting for 1,894 words (IQR: 538 - 5,864). By the last full year of the study period in 2022, the median number of notes had grown to 380 (IQR: 93 - 1,008), representing 61,591 words (IQR: 13,621 - 174,152). Note and word counts were higher for admitted patients.\nConclusion: The volume of notes available for review by providers has increased by over 30-fold in the 17 years since the implementation of the EHR at a large health system. The task of reviewing these notes has become correspondingly more difficult. These data point to the critical need for new strategies and tools for filtering, synthesizing, and summarizing information to achieve the promise of the medical record.","PeriodicalId":501290,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.23.24303213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Numerous studies have identified information overload as a key issue for electronic health records (EHRs). This study describes the amount of text data across all notes available to emergency physicians in the EHR, trended over the time since EHR establishment. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of EHR data from a large healthcare system, examining the number of notes and corresponding number of total words and total tokens across all notes available to physicians during patient encounters in the emergency department (ED). We assessed the change in these metrics over a 17-year period between 2006 and 2023. Results: The study cohort included 730,968 ED visits made by 293,559 unique patients and a total note count of 132,574,964. The median note count for all encounters in 2006 was 7 (IQR: 3 - 18), accounting for 1,894 words (IQR: 538 - 5,864). By the last full year of the study period in 2022, the median number of notes had grown to 380 (IQR: 93 - 1,008), representing 61,591 words (IQR: 13,621 - 174,152). Note and word counts were higher for admitted patients. Conclusion: The volume of notes available for review by providers has increased by over 30-fold in the 17 years since the implementation of the EHR at a large health system. The task of reviewing these notes has become correspondingly more difficult. These data point to the critical need for new strategies and tools for filtering, synthesizing, and summarizing information to achieve the promise of the medical record.
请叫我石梅尔医生急诊室就诊和入院时电子病历记录的趋势
目的:许多研究都认为信息超载是电子健康记录(EHR)的一个关键问题。本研究描述了自电子病历建立以来,急诊医生在电子病历中可获得的所有笔记的文本数据量趋势。材料和方法:我们对一家大型医疗保健系统的电子病历数据进行了回顾性分析,研究了急诊科(ED)医生在接诊患者时可获得的所有笔记的数量以及相应的总字数和总标记数。我们评估了这些指标在 2006 年至 2023 年这 17 年间的变化情况:研究队列包括 293,559 名患者的 730,968 次急诊就诊,笔记总数为 132,574,964 条。2006 年所有就诊记录的中位数为 7(IQR:3 - 18),字数为 1,894 字(IQR:538 - 5,864)。到 2022 年研究期间的最后一整年,笔记数量的中位数增加到 380(IQR:93 - 1,008),占 61,591 字(IQR:13,621 - 174,152)。入院患者的笔记和字数都更多:结论:自一家大型医疗系统使用电子病历以来的 17 年间,医疗服务提供者可查阅的病历数量增加了 30 多倍。审查这些记录的任务也相应地变得更加困难。这些数据表明,亟需新的策略和工具来筛选、综合和总结信息,以实现医疗记录的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信