Virtual vs. Human influencers: The battle for consumer hearts and minds

Abhishek Dondapati, Ranjit Kumar Dehury
{"title":"Virtual vs. Human influencers: The battle for consumer hearts and minds","authors":"Abhishek Dondapati,&nbsp;Ranjit Kumar Dehury","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Virtual influencers, or fictional CGI-generated social media personas, are gaining popularity. However, research lacks information on how they compare to human influencers in shaping consumer attitudes and purchase intent. This study examines whether perceived homophily and para-social relationships mediate the effect of influencer type on purchase intent and the moderating effect of perceived authenticity. A 2 × 2 between-subjects experiment manipulated influencer type (virtual vs. human) and product type (hedonic vs. utilitarian). Young adult participants viewed an Instagram profile of a lifestyle influencer. Authenticity, perceived homophily, para-social relationship, and purchase intent were measured using established scales. Perceived homophily and para-social relationships mediate the effect of influencer type on purchase intent. A significant interaction showed that perceived authenticity moderated the mediated pathway, such that the indirect effect via para-social relationship and perceived homophily was stronger for human influencers. Maintaining an authentic persona is critical for virtual influencers to sway consumer behaviours, especially for audiences less familiar with social media.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"2 1","pages":"Article 100059"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000197/pdfft?md5=20eb84dd566ad4d79f74fed42380915b&pid=1-s2.0-S2949882124000197-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Virtual influencers, or fictional CGI-generated social media personas, are gaining popularity. However, research lacks information on how they compare to human influencers in shaping consumer attitudes and purchase intent. This study examines whether perceived homophily and para-social relationships mediate the effect of influencer type on purchase intent and the moderating effect of perceived authenticity. A 2 × 2 between-subjects experiment manipulated influencer type (virtual vs. human) and product type (hedonic vs. utilitarian). Young adult participants viewed an Instagram profile of a lifestyle influencer. Authenticity, perceived homophily, para-social relationship, and purchase intent were measured using established scales. Perceived homophily and para-social relationships mediate the effect of influencer type on purchase intent. A significant interaction showed that perceived authenticity moderated the mediated pathway, such that the indirect effect via para-social relationship and perceived homophily was stronger for human influencers. Maintaining an authentic persona is critical for virtual influencers to sway consumer behaviours, especially for audiences less familiar with social media.

虚拟影响者与人工影响者:消费者心智之争
虚拟影响者或由 CGI 生成的虚构社交媒体角色越来越受欢迎。然而,有关虚拟影响者与人类影响者在塑造消费者态度和购买意向方面的比较的研究还很缺乏。本研究探讨了感知到的同质性和准社会关系是否会调节影响者类型对购买意向的影响,以及感知到的真实性的调节作用。一项 2 × 2 的主体间实验操纵了影响者类型(虚拟与人类)和产品类型(享乐与功利)。年轻的成年参与者观看了一位生活方式影响者的 Instagram 简介。实验采用既定量表对真实性、感知同质性、准社会关系和购买意向进行了测量。感知到的同质性和准社会关系调解了影响者类型对购买意向的影响。显着的交互作用表明,感知到的真实性调节了中介途径,因此通过社会辅助关系和感知到的同亲关系产生的间接效应对人类影响者更强。虚拟影响者要想左右消费者的行为,尤其是对于不太熟悉社交媒体的受众来说,保持真实的形象至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信