Blast Phase of Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Resembles Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplasia-Related, in Clinical Presentation, Cytogenetic Pattern, and Genomic Profile, and Often Undergoes Reversion to Second Chronic Phase Status After Induction Chemotherapy.

Yue Zhao, Imran Siddiqi, Tyler J Wildes, Derald Charles, Kristen Deak, Endi Wang
{"title":"Blast Phase of Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Resembles Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplasia-Related, in Clinical Presentation, Cytogenetic Pattern, and Genomic Profile, and Often Undergoes Reversion to Second Chronic Phase Status After Induction Chemotherapy.","authors":"Yue Zhao, Imran Siddiqi, Tyler J Wildes, Derald Charles, Kristen Deak, Endi Wang","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0363-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>BCR::ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) has a prolonged clinical course, and some cases eventually undergo transformation to blast phase; its pathogenesis remains to be elucidated.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics of MPN in blast phase.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>The study aimed to retrospectively analyze the clinical and laboratory data of 24 cases.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Median latency to blast phase was 48 months (range, 7-384 months). Complex karyotypes were seen in 12 of the 24 cases (50%). Overall, 16 cases (66.7%) exhibited high allele burdens of MPN driver mutations along with increased blasts, consistent with linear clonal evolution, whereas the remainder (8; 33.3%) showed loss or partial loss of the driver mutation suggestive of a parallel evolution. Additional mutations were noted in 23 cases (100%), including TP53 mutations in 10 of 24 cases (41.7%). Following chemotherapy, 15 of the 24 patients (62.5%) reverted to a second chronic phase while retaining or regaining MPN driver mutations and losing blast-related mutations, although 9 of the 15 patients (60%) later died of disease progression. Median overall survival was 10 months (CI, 4.6-15.4), with those harboring complex karyotypes demonstrating decreased survival (6 versus 29 months; P = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>MPN-blast phase resembles acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplasia-related, in cytogenetic pattern, mutation profile, and clinical outcome. Two patterns of clonal evolution are inferred by dynamic analysis of mutation profiles: linear and parallel evolutions. Although overall survival was dismal, 62.5% of our cases achieved second chronic phase, and they showed better survival than those without second chronic phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0363-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: BCR::ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) has a prolonged clinical course, and some cases eventually undergo transformation to blast phase; its pathogenesis remains to be elucidated.

Objective.—: To evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics of MPN in blast phase.

Design.—: The study aimed to retrospectively analyze the clinical and laboratory data of 24 cases.

Results.—: Median latency to blast phase was 48 months (range, 7-384 months). Complex karyotypes were seen in 12 of the 24 cases (50%). Overall, 16 cases (66.7%) exhibited high allele burdens of MPN driver mutations along with increased blasts, consistent with linear clonal evolution, whereas the remainder (8; 33.3%) showed loss or partial loss of the driver mutation suggestive of a parallel evolution. Additional mutations were noted in 23 cases (100%), including TP53 mutations in 10 of 24 cases (41.7%). Following chemotherapy, 15 of the 24 patients (62.5%) reverted to a second chronic phase while retaining or regaining MPN driver mutations and losing blast-related mutations, although 9 of the 15 patients (60%) later died of disease progression. Median overall survival was 10 months (CI, 4.6-15.4), with those harboring complex karyotypes demonstrating decreased survival (6 versus 29 months; P = .004).

Conclusions.—: MPN-blast phase resembles acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplasia-related, in cytogenetic pattern, mutation profile, and clinical outcome. Two patterns of clonal evolution are inferred by dynamic analysis of mutation profiles: linear and parallel evolutions. Although overall survival was dismal, 62.5% of our cases achieved second chronic phase, and they showed better survival than those without second chronic phase.

骨髓增殖性肿瘤的爆发期在临床表现、细胞遗传学模式和基因组图谱上与骨髓增生异常相关的急性髓性白血病相似,而且在诱导化疗后往往会恢复到第二慢性期状态。
背景BCR::ABL阴性骨髓增生性肿瘤(MPN)的临床病程较长,部分病例最终会转变为爆发期,其发病机制仍有待阐明:评估爆破期 MPN 的临床病理特征:研究旨在回顾性分析24例病例的临床和实验室数据:中位潜伏期为48个月(7-384个月)。24 例病例中有 12 例(50%)出现复杂核型。总体而言,16 个病例(66.7%)表现出高等位基因负担的 MPN 驱动基因突变,同时出现胚泡增多,这与线性克隆进化相一致,而其余病例(8 个;33.3%)则表现出驱动基因突变的缺失或部分缺失,提示为平行进化。23例(100%)患者出现了其他突变,包括24例中的10例(41.7%)出现了TP53突变。化疗后,24 例患者中有 15 例(62.5%)转入第二慢性期,同时保留或恢复了 MPN 驱动基因突变,失去了爆炸相关基因突变,但这 15 例患者中有 9 例(60%)后来死于疾病进展。中位总生存期为10个月(CI,4.6-15.4),携带复杂核型的患者生存期缩短(6个月对29个月;P = .004):结论:骨髓增生性白血病的细胞遗传学模式、基因突变情况和临床结果与骨髓增生异常相关的急性髓性白血病相似。通过对突变图谱的动态分析,可以推断出克隆演化的两种模式:线性演化和平行演化。虽然总生存率很低,但我们的病例中有62.5%达到了第二慢性期,而且他们的生存率高于没有第二慢性期的病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信