Comparative outcomes after treatment of peri-implant, periprosthetic, and interprosthetic femur fractures: which factors increase mortality risk?

Jay K Shah, Laith Z Abwini, Alex Tang, Jason I Yang, David M Keller, Luke G Menken, Frank A Liporace, Richard S Yoon
{"title":"Comparative outcomes after treatment of peri-implant, periprosthetic, and interprosthetic femur fractures: which factors increase mortality risk?","authors":"Jay K Shah, Laith Z Abwini, Alex Tang, Jason I Yang, David M Keller, Luke G Menken, Frank A Liporace, Richard S Yoon","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare mortality rates between patients treated surgically for periprosthetic fractures (PPF) after total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), peri-implant (PI), and interprosthetic (IP) fractures while identifying risk factors associated with mortality following PPF.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single, Level II Trauma Center.</p><p><strong>Patients/participants: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted of 129 consecutive patients treated surgically for fractures around a pre-existing prosthesis or implant from 2013 to 2020. Patients were separated into 4 comparison groups: THA, TKA, PI, and IP fractures.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Revision implant or arthroplasty, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), intramedullary nailing (IMN), percutaneous screws, or a combination of techniques.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measurements: </strong>Primary outcome measures include mortality rates of different types of PPF, PI, and IP fractures at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative. We analyzed risk factors associated with mortality aimed to determine whether treatment type affects mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred twenty-nine patients were included for final analysis. Average follow-up was similar between all groups. The overall 1-year mortality rate was 1 month (5%), 3 months (12%), 6 months (13%), 1 year (15%), and 2 years (22%). There were no differences in mortality rates between each group at 30 days, 90 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years (<i>P</i>-value = 0.86). A Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated no difference in survivorship up to 2 years. Older than 65 years, history of hypothyroidism and dementia, and discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) led to increased mortality. There was no survival benefit in treating patients with PPFs with either revision, ORIF, IMN, or a combination of techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall mortality rates observed were 1 month (5%), 3 months (12%), 6 months (13%), 1 year (15%), and 2 years (22%), and no differences were found between each group at all follow-up time points. Patients aged 65 and older with a history of hypothyroidism and/or dementia discharged to an SNF are at increased risk for mortality. From a mortality perspective, surgeons should not hesitate to choose the surgical treatment they feel most comfortable performing.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"7 1","pages":"e322"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10904097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare mortality rates between patients treated surgically for periprosthetic fractures (PPF) after total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), peri-implant (PI), and interprosthetic (IP) fractures while identifying risk factors associated with mortality following PPF.

Design: Retrospective.

Setting: Single, Level II Trauma Center.

Patients/participants: A retrospective review was conducted of 129 consecutive patients treated surgically for fractures around a pre-existing prosthesis or implant from 2013 to 2020. Patients were separated into 4 comparison groups: THA, TKA, PI, and IP fractures.

Intervention: Revision implant or arthroplasty, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), intramedullary nailing (IMN), percutaneous screws, or a combination of techniques.

Main outcome measurements: Primary outcome measures include mortality rates of different types of PPF, PI, and IP fractures at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative. We analyzed risk factors associated with mortality aimed to determine whether treatment type affects mortality.

Results: One hundred twenty-nine patients were included for final analysis. Average follow-up was similar between all groups. The overall 1-year mortality rate was 1 month (5%), 3 months (12%), 6 months (13%), 1 year (15%), and 2 years (22%). There were no differences in mortality rates between each group at 30 days, 90 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years (P-value = 0.86). A Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated no difference in survivorship up to 2 years. Older than 65 years, history of hypothyroidism and dementia, and discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) led to increased mortality. There was no survival benefit in treating patients with PPFs with either revision, ORIF, IMN, or a combination of techniques.

Conclusion: The overall mortality rates observed were 1 month (5%), 3 months (12%), 6 months (13%), 1 year (15%), and 2 years (22%), and no differences were found between each group at all follow-up time points. Patients aged 65 and older with a history of hypothyroidism and/or dementia discharged to an SNF are at increased risk for mortality. From a mortality perspective, surgeons should not hesitate to choose the surgical treatment they feel most comfortable performing.

Level of evidence: Level III.

植入体周围、假体周围和假体间股骨骨折治疗后的结果比较:哪些因素会增加死亡风险?
目的比较接受全髋关节置换术(THA)、全膝关节置换术(TKA)、假体周围骨折(PI)和假体间骨折(IP)手术治疗的假体周围骨折(PPF)患者的死亡率,同时确定与PPF死亡率相关的风险因素:设计:回顾性:设计:回顾性研究:对 2013 年至 2020 年期间因已有假体或植入物周围骨折而接受手术治疗的 129 例连续患者进行了回顾性研究。患者被分为 4 个对比组:干预:干预措施:翻修假体或关节成形术、切开复位内固定术(ORIF)、髓内钉(IMN)、经皮螺钉或多种技术的组合:主要结果测量指标包括不同类型的 PPF、PI 和 IP 骨折在术后 1 个月、3 个月、6 个月、1 年和 2 年的死亡率。我们分析了与死亡率相关的风险因素,旨在确定治疗类型是否会影响死亡率:最终分析纳入了 129 名患者。各组平均随访时间相似。1年总死亡率分别为1个月(5%)、3个月(12%)、6个月(13%)、1年(15%)和2年(22%)。各组在 30 天、90 天、6 个月、1 年和 2 年的死亡率没有差异(P 值 = 0.86)。卡普兰-梅耶生存曲线显示,两岁以内的存活率没有差异。65岁以上、有甲状腺功能减退症和痴呆症病史以及出院后入住专业护理机构(SNF)会导致死亡率升高。采用翻修术、ORIF、IMN或综合技术治疗PPF患者并不能提高存活率:观察到的总死亡率分别为 1 个月(5%)、3 个月(12%)、6 个月(13%)、1 年(15%)和 2 年(22%),在所有随访时间点上,各组之间均未发现差异。65岁及以上、有甲状腺功能减退症和/或痴呆症病史的患者出院后入住SNF,其死亡风险会增加。从死亡率的角度来看,外科医生应该毫不犹豫地选择他们认为最适合的手术治疗方法:证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信