Is supine a preferred position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the pediatric age group? A randomized controlled study.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ahmed M Tawfeek, Hisham Arafa, Ahmed Higazy, Ahmed Radwan, Ahmed Tawfick
{"title":"Is supine a preferred position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the pediatric age group? A randomized controlled study.","authors":"Ahmed M Tawfeek, Hisham Arafa, Ahmed Higazy, Ahmed Radwan, Ahmed Tawfick","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05496-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim is to evaluate supine versus prone position in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric renal urolithiasis management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was constructed to evaluate supine versus prone position in pediatric PCNL. Seventy pediatric patients with a stone burden ≥1.5 cm were randomized into two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three patients were available for evaluation in our study with no significant difference in the perioperative demographic data. The supine group showed a shorter operation time of 43.9 min compared to 73.5 min in the prone group. The stone-free rate was higher in the supine group, with a 93.9% SFR compared to 83.3% in the prone group. The supine group showed a shorter hospital stay of 2.0±1.0 days, compared to 3.20±1.56 days in the prone group. No significant difference was seen in the perioperative complication rate and fluoroscopy time between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is safe and effective in managing pediatric renal stones, with a higher stone-free rate, less operative time, and less hospital stay compared to the prone position.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"76 1","pages":"81-87"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05496-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim is to evaluate supine versus prone position in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric renal urolithiasis management.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was constructed to evaluate supine versus prone position in pediatric PCNL. Seventy pediatric patients with a stone burden ≥1.5 cm were randomized into two groups.

Results: Sixty-three patients were available for evaluation in our study with no significant difference in the perioperative demographic data. The supine group showed a shorter operation time of 43.9 min compared to 73.5 min in the prone group. The stone-free rate was higher in the supine group, with a 93.9% SFR compared to 83.3% in the prone group. The supine group showed a shorter hospital stay of 2.0±1.0 days, compared to 3.20±1.56 days in the prone group. No significant difference was seen in the perioperative complication rate and fluoroscopy time between both groups.

Conclusions: Supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is safe and effective in managing pediatric renal stones, with a higher stone-free rate, less operative time, and less hospital stay compared to the prone position.

儿童经皮肾镜取石术首选仰卧位吗?随机对照研究。
背景:目的是评估小儿肾性尿路结石治疗中仰卧位与俯卧位的对比:目的是评估小儿肾性尿路结石治疗中迷你经皮肾镜取石术的仰卧位与俯卧位:方法:我们构建了一项随机对照试验,以评估在小儿 PCNL 中采用仰卧位还是俯卧位的效果。70名结石≥1.5厘米的小儿患者被随机分为两组:结果:63 名患者接受了我们的评估,围手术期的人口统计学数据无明显差异。仰卧组的手术时间较短,为 43.9 分钟,而俯卧组为 73.5 分钟。仰卧组的无结石率更高,无结石率为 93.9%,而俯卧组为 83.3%。仰卧组的住院时间较短,为 2.0±1.0 天,而俯卧组为 3.20±1.56 天。两组围术期并发症发生率和透视时间无明显差异:仰卧位迷你经皮肾镜取石术治疗小儿肾结石安全有效,与俯卧位相比,无石率更高、手术时间更短、住院时间更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Minerva Urology and Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
32.70%
发文量
237
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信