Measuring susceptibility to use tobacco in an increasingly complex consumer marketplace: How many questions do we really need?

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Claude M Setodji, Steven C Martino, Michael Dunbar, Kyung Jin Kim, Desmond Jenson, Jody C S Wong, William G Shadel
{"title":"Measuring susceptibility to use tobacco in an increasingly complex consumer marketplace: How many questions do we really need?","authors":"Claude M Setodji, Steven C Martino, Michael Dunbar, Kyung Jin Kim, Desmond Jenson, Jody C S Wong, William G Shadel","doi":"10.1037/adb0000997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Predicting which young people are likely to use tobacco in the future is critical for prevention and intervention. Although measures for assessing susceptibility to using tobacco have fulfilled this goal for decades, there is almost no standard for the number of items that should be administered, or which items should be administered for which products. This study explored whether brief but psychometrically sound versions of commonly used susceptibility measures can adequately capture the construct relative to longer measures.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A sample of young people (<i>N</i> = 451; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 16.5 years; 64% females; 65% White) completed 33 susceptibility items, which are designed to assess susceptibility to use different types of tobacco products (cigarette, smokeless tobacco, vaping products, and little cigars/cigarillos) of various flavors (tobacco, menthol, and sweet).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of these 33 items indicated that asking about the likelihood of using each tobacco product class when a best friend offers it (four items in all) captures 98.5% of information that is captured using the longer set of items; asking the best friend question for each product by each flavor category (11 items in all) captures 99.7% of the information.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Depending on research needs, tobacco use susceptibility can be measured with little loss of information by administering a limited set of items assessing the likelihood that a young person will use a tobacco product if a friend offers it for any product-flavor combination. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48325,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11358647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000997","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Predicting which young people are likely to use tobacco in the future is critical for prevention and intervention. Although measures for assessing susceptibility to using tobacco have fulfilled this goal for decades, there is almost no standard for the number of items that should be administered, or which items should be administered for which products. This study explored whether brief but psychometrically sound versions of commonly used susceptibility measures can adequately capture the construct relative to longer measures.

Method: A sample of young people (N = 451; Mage = 16.5 years; 64% females; 65% White) completed 33 susceptibility items, which are designed to assess susceptibility to use different types of tobacco products (cigarette, smokeless tobacco, vaping products, and little cigars/cigarillos) of various flavors (tobacco, menthol, and sweet).

Results: Analysis of these 33 items indicated that asking about the likelihood of using each tobacco product class when a best friend offers it (four items in all) captures 98.5% of information that is captured using the longer set of items; asking the best friend question for each product by each flavor category (11 items in all) captures 99.7% of the information.

Conclusions: Depending on research needs, tobacco use susceptibility can be measured with little loss of information by administering a limited set of items assessing the likelihood that a young person will use a tobacco product if a friend offers it for any product-flavor combination. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

在日益复杂的消费者市场中衡量烟草使用的易感性:我们到底需要多少问题?
目的:预测哪些青少年将来可能使用烟草对于预防和干预至关重要。尽管数十年来,评估烟草使用易感性的测量方法一直在实现这一目标,但对于测量项目的数量或测量哪些产品应测量哪些项目,几乎没有标准可循。本研究探讨了简短但心理统计学上合理的常用易感性测量方法是否能比较长的测量方法更充分地反映易感性:青少年样本(N = 451;年龄 = 16.5岁;64%为女性;65%为白人)完成了33个易感项目,这些项目旨在评估使用不同类型、不同口味(烟草味、薄荷味和甜味)烟草制品(卷烟、无烟烟草制品、电子烟制品和小雪茄/雪茄烟)的易感程度:对这 33 个项目的分析表明,询问好友提供每类烟草制品时使用该类制品的可能性(共 4 个项目)可捕捉到 98.5%的信息,而使用较长的项目集可捕捉到这些信息;针对每类烟草制品的每种口味类别询问好友问题(共 11 个项目)可捕捉到 99.7%的信息:结论:根据研究需要,可以在几乎不损失信息的情况下测量烟草使用易感性,方法是实施一套有限的项目,评估年轻人在朋友提供任何产品-口味组合的烟草制品时使用该制品的可能性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Psychology of Addictive Behaviors publishes peer-reviewed original articles related to the psychological aspects of addictive behaviors. The journal includes articles on the following topics: - alcohol and alcoholism - drug use and abuse - eating disorders - smoking and nicotine addiction, and other excessive behaviors (e.g., gambling) Full-length research reports, literature reviews, brief reports, and comments are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信