To flare or not to flare: patients' and rheumatologists' perceptions on the on-flare retreatment strategy of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease Pub Date : 2024-02-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1759720X241232268
Delphine Bertrand, Anke Deprez, Michaël Doumen, Diederik De Cock, Sofia Pazmino, Anja Marchal, Marc Thelissen, Johan Joly, Elias De Meyst, Barbara Neerinckx, René Westhovens, Patrick Verschueren
{"title":"To flare or not to flare: patients' and rheumatologists' perceptions on the on-flare retreatment strategy of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis.","authors":"Delphine Bertrand, Anke Deprez, Michaël Doumen, Diederik De Cock, Sofia Pazmino, Anja Marchal, Marc Thelissen, Johan Joly, Elias De Meyst, Barbara Neerinckx, René Westhovens, Patrick Verschueren","doi":"10.1177/1759720X241232268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several retreatment strategies exist for rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In some countries, reimbursement criteria require a loss of disease control for rituximab retreatment. Understanding the patients' and rheumatologists' perceptions regarding this retreatment strategy would be informative in identifying the optimal treatment administration schedule.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to uncover patients' and rheumatologists' perceptions regarding retreatment strategies of rituximab.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative study - semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with RA, treated with rituximab, and rheumatologists were invited to participate in a qualitative study consisting of individual, in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Interviews were analysed according to the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 patients and 13 rheumatologists were interviewed. Benefits (e.g. decreased risk of overtreatment, cost savings and long-lasting effectiveness of rituximab) and barriers (e.g. fluctuating disease activity, slow mode of action and increased glucocorticoid use) of on-flare retreatment were identified. To effectively treat on-flare, flares must first be identified timely. Both stakeholder groups acknowledged that patients are capable of recognizing flares. However, the patient's ability to discriminate between inflammatory and other types of pain was perceived as difficult. Furthermore, patients and rheumatologists stressed that patients must timely seek professional help in case of a flare, followed by a swift response from the rheumatologists. Remarkably, retreatment was approached in various ways among rheumatologists, and not always adhering strictly to the on-flare reimbursement criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed that both stakeholder groups perceived the heterogeneity in recognition of and reaction to a flare as important in influencing the effectiveness of the on-flare retreatment strategy. Moreover, this study identified the benefits and barriers of treating on-flare, which could be informative for daily practice decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23056,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10903194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X241232268","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several retreatment strategies exist for rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In some countries, reimbursement criteria require a loss of disease control for rituximab retreatment. Understanding the patients' and rheumatologists' perceptions regarding this retreatment strategy would be informative in identifying the optimal treatment administration schedule.

Objectives: This study aimed to uncover patients' and rheumatologists' perceptions regarding retreatment strategies of rituximab.

Design: Qualitative study - semi-structured interviews.

Methods: Patients with RA, treated with rituximab, and rheumatologists were invited to participate in a qualitative study consisting of individual, in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Interviews were analysed according to the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven.

Results: A total of 16 patients and 13 rheumatologists were interviewed. Benefits (e.g. decreased risk of overtreatment, cost savings and long-lasting effectiveness of rituximab) and barriers (e.g. fluctuating disease activity, slow mode of action and increased glucocorticoid use) of on-flare retreatment were identified. To effectively treat on-flare, flares must first be identified timely. Both stakeholder groups acknowledged that patients are capable of recognizing flares. However, the patient's ability to discriminate between inflammatory and other types of pain was perceived as difficult. Furthermore, patients and rheumatologists stressed that patients must timely seek professional help in case of a flare, followed by a swift response from the rheumatologists. Remarkably, retreatment was approached in various ways among rheumatologists, and not always adhering strictly to the on-flare reimbursement criteria.

Conclusion: This study revealed that both stakeholder groups perceived the heterogeneity in recognition of and reaction to a flare as important in influencing the effectiveness of the on-flare retreatment strategy. Moreover, this study identified the benefits and barriers of treating on-flare, which could be informative for daily practice decisions.

发作还是不发作:患者和风湿免疫科医生对类风湿性关节炎患者利妥昔单抗发作时再治疗策略的看法。
背景:针对类风湿性关节炎(RA)的利妥昔单抗再治疗有多种策略。在一些国家,报销标准要求利妥昔单抗再治疗必须达到疾病失控的程度。了解患者和风湿免疫科医生对这一再治疗策略的看法有助于确定最佳治疗用药时间:本研究旨在了解患者和风湿免疫科医生对利妥昔单抗再治疗策略的看法:定性研究--半结构式访谈:方法:邀请接受利妥昔单抗治疗的RA患者和风湿免疫科医生参加一项定性研究,包括个人、深入、半结构化访谈。访谈按照鲁汶定性分析指南进行分析:共有 16 名患者和 13 名风湿免疫科医生接受了访谈。结果:共访谈了16名患者和13名风湿病学家,发现了发作期再治疗的优势(如降低过度治疗风险、节约成本和利妥昔单抗的持久疗效)和障碍(如疾病活动性波动、作用方式缓慢和糖皮质激素用量增加)。要有效治疗发作期再治疗,首先必须及时发现发作期再治疗。两个利益相关者小组都承认,患者有能力识别复发。然而,他们认为患者很难区分炎症性疼痛和其他类型的疼痛。此外,患者和风湿免疫科医生都强调,一旦病情复发,患者必须及时寻求专业帮助,风湿免疫科医生也应迅速做出反应。值得注意的是,风湿免疫科医生对再治疗的态度各不相同,并不总是严格遵守复发时的报销标准:本研究显示,两个利益相关群体都认为,对复发的认识和反应的差异性是影响复发再治疗策略有效性的重要因素。此外,本研究还发现了耀斑时治疗的益处和障碍,这对日常实践决策具有参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of musculoskeletal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信