Does the use of surgical face masks reduce postoperative infections in traumatic wounds sutured outside hospital? A randomized study at a Norwegian casualty center.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1080/02813432.2024.2315438
Kristoffer Holen Sælen, Synne Hatlemark, Christina Brudvik, Torbjørn Hiis Bergh, Soosaipillai V Bernardshaw, Knut Steen
{"title":"Does the use of surgical face masks reduce postoperative infections in traumatic wounds sutured outside hospital? A randomized study at a Norwegian casualty center.","authors":"Kristoffer Holen Sælen, Synne Hatlemark, Christina Brudvik, Torbjørn Hiis Bergh, Soosaipillai V Bernardshaw, Knut Steen","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2024.2315438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate if wearing surgical face mask by doctors and nurses during suturing of traumatic wounds has any impact on postoperative infection rate.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled study with masked or unmasked health personnel groups.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A Norwegian Minor Injury Department.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Adult patients with traumatic wounds sutured at the clinic between 7 October 2019 and 28 May 2020.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Postoperative infections of sutured wounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and sixty-five patients with 176 wounds were included in the study. Nine out of 88 wounds (10.2%) in the masked group and 11 out of 88 wounds in the unmasked group (12.5%) had a wound infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite a higher percentage of postoperative infections in the unmasked than in the masked group (12.5% versus 10.2%), the difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = .6). This might imply that the use of facemasks during suture of traumatic wounds in an outpatient setting does not significantly reduce the number of infections. However, due to the covid pandemic, the study had to be prematurely stopped before the planned number of participants had been recruited (<i>n</i> = 594). This increases the risk of type II error.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11003311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2315438","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate if wearing surgical face mask by doctors and nurses during suturing of traumatic wounds has any impact on postoperative infection rate.

Design: Randomized controlled study with masked or unmasked health personnel groups.

Setting: A Norwegian Minor Injury Department.

Subjects: Adult patients with traumatic wounds sutured at the clinic between 7 October 2019 and 28 May 2020.

Main outcome measures: Postoperative infections of sutured wounds.

Results: One hundred and sixty-five patients with 176 wounds were included in the study. Nine out of 88 wounds (10.2%) in the masked group and 11 out of 88 wounds in the unmasked group (12.5%) had a wound infection.

Conclusions: Despite a higher percentage of postoperative infections in the unmasked than in the masked group (12.5% versus 10.2%), the difference was not statistically significant (p = .6). This might imply that the use of facemasks during suture of traumatic wounds in an outpatient setting does not significantly reduce the number of infections. However, due to the covid pandemic, the study had to be prematurely stopped before the planned number of participants had been recruited (n = 594). This increases the risk of type II error.

使用外科口罩能否减少院外缝合创伤伤口的术后感染?一项在挪威伤员救治中心进行的随机研究。
目的:研究医生和护士在缝合外伤伤口时佩戴外科口罩是否会影响术后感染率:调查医生和护士在缝合外伤伤口时佩戴外科口罩是否会影响术后感染率:随机对照研究,医务人员分为戴口罩组和不戴口罩组:研究对象: 接受外伤缝合的成年患者:2019年10月7日至2020年5月28日期间在诊所缝合外伤伤口的成年患者:缝合伤口的术后感染:165名患者共176处伤口被纳入研究。戴口罩组 88 个伤口中有 9 个(10.2%)发生伤口感染,未戴口罩组 88 个伤口中有 11 个(12.5%)发生伤口感染:结论:尽管未戴口罩组的术后感染率高于戴口罩组(12.5% 对 10.2%),但差异无统计学意义(p = .6)。这可能意味着,在门诊环境中缝合创伤伤口时使用面罩并不能显著减少感染的数量。然而,由于科维病毒大流行,该研究不得不在招募到计划人数(n = 594)之前提前终止。这增加了II型错误的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信