Impact of Onset Time, Number, Type, and Sequence of Extrahepatic Organ Failure on Prognosis of Acute-on-chronic Liver Failure.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Shaotian Qiu, Qian Zhang, Jiaxuan Hu, Lewei Wang, Rui Chen, Yingying Cao, Fang Liu, Zhenjun Yu, Caiyan Zhao, Liaoyun Zhang, Wanhua Ren, Shaojie Xin, Yu Chen, Zhongping Duan, Tao Han
{"title":"Impact of Onset Time, Number, Type, and Sequence of Extrahepatic Organ Failure on Prognosis of Acute-on-chronic Liver Failure.","authors":"Shaotian Qiu, Qian Zhang, Jiaxuan Hu, Lewei Wang, Rui Chen, Yingying Cao, Fang Liu, Zhenjun Yu, Caiyan Zhao, Liaoyun Zhang, Wanhua Ren, Shaojie Xin, Yu Chen, Zhongping Duan, Tao Han","doi":"10.14218/JCTH.2023.00379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The impact of the characteristics of extrahepatic organ failure (EHOF) including the onset time, number, type, and sequence on the prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) patients remains unknown. This study aimed to identify the association between the characteristics of EHOF and the prognosis of ACLF patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ACLF subjects enrolled at six hospitals in China were included in the analysis. The risk of mortality based on the characteristics of EHOF was evaluated. Survival of study groups was compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 736 patients with ACLF were included. EHOF was observed in 402 patients (54.6%), of which 295 (73.4%) developed single EHOF (SEHOF) and 107 (26.6%) developed multiple EHOF (MEHOF). The most commonly observed EHOF was coagulation failure (47.0%), followed by renal (13.0%), brain (4.9%), respiratory (4.3%), and circulatory (2.3%) failure. Survival analysis found that MEHOF or SEHOF patients with brain failure had a worse prognosis. However, no significant outcome was found in the analysis of the effect of onset time and sequence of failed organs on prognosis. Patients were further divided into three risk subgroups by the EHOF characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that risk stratification resulted in the differentiation of patients with different risks of mortality both in the training and validation cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mortality of ACLF patients was determined by the number and type, but not the onset time and sequence of EHOF. Risk stratification applicable to clinical practice was established.</p>","PeriodicalId":15484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology","volume":"12 3","pages":"257-265"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10899869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14218/JCTH.2023.00379","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The impact of the characteristics of extrahepatic organ failure (EHOF) including the onset time, number, type, and sequence on the prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) patients remains unknown. This study aimed to identify the association between the characteristics of EHOF and the prognosis of ACLF patients.

Methods: ACLF subjects enrolled at six hospitals in China were included in the analysis. The risk of mortality based on the characteristics of EHOF was evaluated. Survival of study groups was compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests.

Results: A total of 736 patients with ACLF were included. EHOF was observed in 402 patients (54.6%), of which 295 (73.4%) developed single EHOF (SEHOF) and 107 (26.6%) developed multiple EHOF (MEHOF). The most commonly observed EHOF was coagulation failure (47.0%), followed by renal (13.0%), brain (4.9%), respiratory (4.3%), and circulatory (2.3%) failure. Survival analysis found that MEHOF or SEHOF patients with brain failure had a worse prognosis. However, no significant outcome was found in the analysis of the effect of onset time and sequence of failed organs on prognosis. Patients were further divided into three risk subgroups by the EHOF characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that risk stratification resulted in the differentiation of patients with different risks of mortality both in the training and validation cohorts.

Conclusions: The mortality of ACLF patients was determined by the number and type, but not the onset time and sequence of EHOF. Risk stratification applicable to clinical practice was established.

肝外器官衰竭的发病时间、数量、类型和顺序对急性慢性肝衰竭预后的影响
背景和目的:肝外器官功能衰竭(EHOF)的发病时间、数量、类型和顺序等特征对急性-慢性肝衰竭(ACLF)患者预后的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定 EHOF 的特征与 ACLF 患者预后之间的关联:方法:将中国六家医院的 ACLF 受试者纳入分析。根据 EHOF 的特征评估死亡风险。通过卡普兰-梅耶尔分析和对数秩检验比较研究组的生存率:结果:共纳入 736 例 ACLF 患者。402名患者(54.6%)出现了EHOF,其中295名患者(73.4%)出现了单发EHOF(SEHOF),107名患者(26.6%)出现了多发EHOF(MEHOF)。最常见的 EHOF 是凝血功能衰竭(47.0%),其次是肾功能衰竭(13.0%)、脑功能衰竭(4.9%)、呼吸功能衰竭(4.3%)和循环功能衰竭(2.3%)。生存分析发现,MEHOF 或 SEHOF 脑衰竭患者的预后较差。然而,在分析发病时间和器官衰竭顺序对预后的影响时,没有发现明显的结果。根据EHOF特征,患者被进一步分为三个风险亚组。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,风险分层的结果是,在训练组和验证组中,患者的死亡风险不同:结论:ACLF患者的死亡率取决于EHOF的数量和类型,而不是发病时间和顺序。适用于临床实践的风险分层已经确立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology
Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.80%
发文量
496
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信