[Apheresis Techniques for the Treatment of Hyperbilirubinemia in the Nephrology Unit].

Q4 Medicine
Emanuela de Pascale, Gaia Marinelli, Pietro Iulianiello, Rossana Matrisciano, Davide Viggiano, Corrado Pluvio
{"title":"[Apheresis Techniques for the Treatment of Hyperbilirubinemia in the Nephrology Unit].","authors":"Emanuela de Pascale, Gaia Marinelli, Pietro Iulianiello, Rossana Matrisciano, Davide Viggiano, Corrado Pluvio","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Therapeutic apheresis is an important hematological and nephrological method for conditions with altered plasma composition. It is also indicated for the removal of protein-bound molecules, such as bilirubin. Several techniques can remove these compounds, such as the extracorporeal circulation molecular adsorption system (MARS), plasma exchange (PEX), and plasma adsorption and perfusion (PAP). Here we report our experience in the comparison between MARS, PEX and PAP, since current guidelines do not specify which method is the most appropriate and under which circumstances it should be used. The choice of technique cannot be based on the desired plasma bilirubin concentration, since these three techniques show similar results with a similar final outcome (exitus). In fact, PAP, PEX and MARS significantly reduce bilirubin levels, but the degree of reduction is not different among the three. Furthermore, the three techniques do not differ in the rate of cholinesterase change, while less reduction of liver transaminases was found by using PAP. MARS should be preferred in the case of renal involvement (hepatorenal syndrome with hyperbilirubinemia). PAP has the advantage of being simple and inexpensive. PEX remains an option when emergency PAP is not available, but the risk of using blood products (plasma and albumin) must be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":12553,"journal":{"name":"Giornale italiano di nefrologia : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di nefrologia","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale italiano di nefrologia : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di nefrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Therapeutic apheresis is an important hematological and nephrological method for conditions with altered plasma composition. It is also indicated for the removal of protein-bound molecules, such as bilirubin. Several techniques can remove these compounds, such as the extracorporeal circulation molecular adsorption system (MARS), plasma exchange (PEX), and plasma adsorption and perfusion (PAP). Here we report our experience in the comparison between MARS, PEX and PAP, since current guidelines do not specify which method is the most appropriate and under which circumstances it should be used. The choice of technique cannot be based on the desired plasma bilirubin concentration, since these three techniques show similar results with a similar final outcome (exitus). In fact, PAP, PEX and MARS significantly reduce bilirubin levels, but the degree of reduction is not different among the three. Furthermore, the three techniques do not differ in the rate of cholinesterase change, while less reduction of liver transaminases was found by using PAP. MARS should be preferred in the case of renal involvement (hepatorenal syndrome with hyperbilirubinemia). PAP has the advantage of being simple and inexpensive. PEX remains an option when emergency PAP is not available, but the risk of using blood products (plasma and albumin) must be considered.

[肾内科治疗高胆红素血症的分流技术]。
治疗性血液透析是一种重要的血液学和肾学方法,用于治疗血浆成分改变的疾病。它还适用于清除胆红素等与蛋白质结合的分子。有几种技术可以清除这些化合物,如体外循环分子吸附系统(MARS)、血浆置换(PEX)和血浆吸附灌注(PAP)。由于目前的指南并未明确规定哪种方法最合适,以及在何种情况下应使用哪种方法,因此我们在此报告我们在比较 MARS、PEX 和 PAP 方面的经验。选择哪种技术不能以所需的血浆胆红素浓度为依据,因为这三种技术显示的结果相似,最终结果也相似(exitus)。事实上,PAP、PEX 和 MARS 都能显著降低胆红素水平,但三者的降低程度并无不同。此外,这三种技术在胆碱酯酶的变化率上也没有区别,而使用 PAP 时,肝脏转氨酶的降低幅度较小。在肾脏受累(肝肾综合征伴高胆红素血症)的情况下,应首选 MARS。PAP 具有简单、便宜的优点。当无法使用紧急 PAP 时,PEX 仍是一种选择,但必须考虑使用血液制品(血浆和白蛋白)的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Il Giornale Italiano di Nefrologia (GIN) è la rivista di educazione continua della Società Italiana di Nefrologia SIN ed è pubblicato bimestralmente. E" il più autorevole organo di informazione nefrologia disponibile a livello nazionale. Il giornale Italiano di Nefrologia offre la più aggiornata informazione medico-scientifica rivolta al nefrologo sotto forma di rassegne, casi clinici e articoli finalizzati all’Educazione Continua in Medicina, oltre ai notiziari ed agli atti dei congressi di questa prestigiosa Società Scientifica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信