Systematic Review of the Association of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score with Mortality in Patients with Cerebrovascular and Cardiovascular Disease.

IF 2.4 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Balamrit Singh Sokhal, Sowmya Prasanna Kumar Menon, Charles Willes, Nadia Corp, Andrija Matetić, Christian Mallen, Mamas Mamas
{"title":"Systematic Review of the Association of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score with Mortality in Patients with Cerebrovascular and Cardiovascular Disease.","authors":"Balamrit Singh Sokhal, Sowmya Prasanna Kumar Menon, Charles Willes, Nadia Corp, Andrija Matetić, Christian Mallen, Mamas Mamas","doi":"10.2174/011573403X276647240217112151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited systematic data on the association between the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) and characteristics and mortality in patients with cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease (CVD). This systematic review aimed to summarise the use of the HFRS in describing the prevalence of frailty in patients with CVD, the clinical characteristics of patients with CVD, and the association between frailty on the likelihood of mortality in patients with CVD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search for observational studies using terms related to CVD, cerebrovascular disease, and the HFRS was conducted using 6 databases in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen observational studies were included, all rated 'good' quality according to the NOS. One study investigated 5 different CVD cohorts (atrial fibrillation (AF), heart failure (HF), hypotension, hypertension, and chronic ischemic heart disease), 1 study investigated 2 different CVD cohorts (AF and acute myocardial infarction (AMI)), 6 studies investigated HF, 3 studies investigated AMI, 4 studies investigated stroke, 1 study investigated AF, and 1 study investigated cardiac arrest. Increasing frailty risk category was associated with increased age, female sex, and non-white racial group across all CVD. Increasing frailty risk category is also associated with increased length of hospital stay, total costs, and increased odds of 30-day all-cause mortality across all CVD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HFRS is an efficient and effective tool for stratifying frailty in patients with CVD and predicting adverse health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10832,"journal":{"name":"Current Cardiology Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11284698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Cardiology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/011573403X276647240217112151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is limited systematic data on the association between the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) and characteristics and mortality in patients with cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease (CVD). This systematic review aimed to summarise the use of the HFRS in describing the prevalence of frailty in patients with CVD, the clinical characteristics of patients with CVD, and the association between frailty on the likelihood of mortality in patients with CVD.

Methods: A systematic literature search for observational studies using terms related to CVD, cerebrovascular disease, and the HFRS was conducted using 6 databases in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

Results: Seventeen observational studies were included, all rated 'good' quality according to the NOS. One study investigated 5 different CVD cohorts (atrial fibrillation (AF), heart failure (HF), hypotension, hypertension, and chronic ischemic heart disease), 1 study investigated 2 different CVD cohorts (AF and acute myocardial infarction (AMI)), 6 studies investigated HF, 3 studies investigated AMI, 4 studies investigated stroke, 1 study investigated AF, and 1 study investigated cardiac arrest. Increasing frailty risk category was associated with increased age, female sex, and non-white racial group across all CVD. Increasing frailty risk category is also associated with increased length of hospital stay, total costs, and increased odds of 30-day all-cause mortality across all CVD.

Conclusions: The HFRS is an efficient and effective tool for stratifying frailty in patients with CVD and predicting adverse health outcomes.

医院虚弱风险评分与脑血管和心血管疾病患者死亡率关系的系统性综述》。
背景:关于医院虚弱风险评分(HFRS)与脑血管病和心血管病(CVD)患者的特征和死亡率之间关系的系统性数据十分有限。本系统性综述旨在总结医院虚弱风险评分在描述心血管疾病患者的虚弱发生率、心血管疾病患者的临床特征以及虚弱与心血管疾病患者死亡率之间的关联方面的应用情况:根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南,我们使用 6 个数据库对观察性研究进行了系统性文献检索,并使用了与心血管疾病、脑血管疾病和 HFRS 相关的术语。研究采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行评估:结果:共纳入 17 项观察性研究,根据 NOS,所有研究的质量都被评为 "良好"。一项研究调查了 5 个不同的心血管疾病队列(心房颤动(AF)、心力衰竭(HF)、低血压、高血压和慢性缺血性心脏病),一项研究调查了 2 个不同的心血管疾病队列(心房颤动和急性心肌梗死(AMI)),6 项研究调查了心力衰竭,3 项研究调查了急性心肌梗死,4 项研究调查了中风,1 项研究调查了心房颤动,1 项研究调查了心脏骤停。在所有心血管疾病中,虚弱风险类别的增加与年龄、女性性别和非白人种族群体的增加有关。在所有心血管疾病中,虚弱风险类别的增加还与住院时间的增加、总费用的增加以及30天全因死亡率的增加有关:HFRS是对心血管疾病患者的虚弱程度进行分层并预测不良健康后果的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Cardiology Reviews
Current Cardiology Reviews CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: Current Cardiology Reviews publishes frontier reviews of high quality on all the latest advances on the practical and clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. All relevant areas are covered by the journal including arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, drugs, methodology, pacing, and preventive cardiology. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信