Assessing Discomfort in American Adult Intensive Care Patients.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Marshall S Gunnels, Emily M Reisdorf, Jay Mandrekar, Linda L Chlan
{"title":"Assessing Discomfort in American Adult Intensive Care Patients.","authors":"Marshall S Gunnels, Emily M Reisdorf, Jay Mandrekar, Linda L Chlan","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While in the intensive care unit, critically ill patients experience a myriad of distressing symptoms and stimuli leading to discomfort, a negative emotional and/ or physical state that arises in response to noxious stimuli. Appropriate management of these symptoms requires a distinct assessment of discomfort-causing experiences.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess patient-reported discomfort among critically ill patients with the English-language version of the Inconforts des Patients de REAnimation questionnaire, and to explore relationships between demographic and clinical characteristics and overall discomfort score on this instrument.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study had a cross-sectional, descriptive, single-cohort design. The convenience sample consisted of alert and oriented patients aged 18 years or older who had been admitted to intensive care units at a Midwestern tertiary referral hospital and were invited to participate. An 18-item questionnaire on physiological and psychological stimuli inducing discomfort was administered once. Each item was scored from 0 to 10, with the total possible discomfort score ranging from 0 to 100. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze participants' demographic and clinical characteristics and questionnaire responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 180 patients were enrolled. The mean (SD) overall discomfort score was 32.9 (23.6). The greatest sources of discomfort were sleep deprivation (mean [SD] score, 4.0 [3.4]), presence of perfusion catheters and tubing (3.4 [2.9]), thirst (3.0 [3.3]), and pain (3.0 [3.0]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intensive care unit patients in this study reported mild to moderate discomfort. Additional research is needed to design and test interventions based on assessment of specific discomfort-promoting stimuli to provide effective symptom management.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"33 2","pages":"126-132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2024362","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While in the intensive care unit, critically ill patients experience a myriad of distressing symptoms and stimuli leading to discomfort, a negative emotional and/ or physical state that arises in response to noxious stimuli. Appropriate management of these symptoms requires a distinct assessment of discomfort-causing experiences.

Objectives: To assess patient-reported discomfort among critically ill patients with the English-language version of the Inconforts des Patients de REAnimation questionnaire, and to explore relationships between demographic and clinical characteristics and overall discomfort score on this instrument.

Methods: This study had a cross-sectional, descriptive, single-cohort design. The convenience sample consisted of alert and oriented patients aged 18 years or older who had been admitted to intensive care units at a Midwestern tertiary referral hospital and were invited to participate. An 18-item questionnaire on physiological and psychological stimuli inducing discomfort was administered once. Each item was scored from 0 to 10, with the total possible discomfort score ranging from 0 to 100. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze participants' demographic and clinical characteristics and questionnaire responses.

Results: A total of 180 patients were enrolled. The mean (SD) overall discomfort score was 32.9 (23.6). The greatest sources of discomfort were sleep deprivation (mean [SD] score, 4.0 [3.4]), presence of perfusion catheters and tubing (3.4 [2.9]), thirst (3.0 [3.3]), and pain (3.0 [3.0]).

Conclusions: Intensive care unit patients in this study reported mild to moderate discomfort. Additional research is needed to design and test interventions based on assessment of specific discomfort-promoting stimuli to provide effective symptom management.

评估美国成人重症监护患者的不适感。
背景:在重症监护病房,重症患者会经历无数令人痛苦的症状和刺激,从而导致不适,这是一种因有害刺激而产生的负面情绪和/或身体状态。要对这些症状进行适当处理,就必须对引起不适的经历进行明确评估:使用英文版 "重症患者不适感"(Inconforts des Patients de REAnimation)问卷评估重症患者报告的不适感,并探讨人口统计学和临床特征与该问卷中总体不适感得分之间的关系:本研究采用横断面、描述性、单队列设计。研究对象为中西部一家三级转诊医院的重症监护病房收治的 18 岁或 18 岁以上、精神饱满的患者。他们接受了一次由 18 个项目组成的问卷调查,内容涉及引起不适的生理和心理刺激。每个项目的分值从 0 到 10 不等,不适感总分从 0 到 100 不等。对参与者的人口统计学特征、临床特征和问卷回答进行了描述性统计分析:结果:共有 180 名患者参加了调查。不适感总分的平均值(标清)为 32.9(23.6)分。最大的不适感来源是睡眠不足(平均[标码]得分 4.0 [3.4])、存在灌注导管和管道(3.4 [2.9])、口渴(3.0 [3.3])和疼痛(3.0 [3.0]):结论:本研究中的重症监护室患者报告了轻度至中度不适。需要进行更多的研究来设计和测试基于特定不适刺激评估的干预措施,以提供有效的症状管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信