Solving for hydroelastic ship response using a high-order finite difference method on overlapping grids at zero speed

IF 4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Baoshun Zhou , Mostafa Amini-Afshar , Harry B. Bingham , Yanlin Shao , Šime Malenica , Matilde H. Andersen
{"title":"Solving for hydroelastic ship response using a high-order finite difference method on overlapping grids at zero speed","authors":"Baoshun Zhou ,&nbsp;Mostafa Amini-Afshar ,&nbsp;Harry B. Bingham ,&nbsp;Yanlin Shao ,&nbsp;Šime Malenica ,&nbsp;Matilde H. Andersen","doi":"10.1016/j.marstruc.2024.103602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This work extends an existing seakeeping tool (<em>OceanWave3D-seakeeping</em>) to allow for the efficient and accurate evaluation of the hydroelastic response of large flexible ships sailing in waves. <em>OceanWave3D-seakeeping</em> solves the linearized potential flow problem using high-order finite differences on overlapping curvilinear body-fitted grids. Generalized modes are introduced to capture the flexural responses at both zero and non-zero forward speed, but we focus on the zero speed case here. The implementation of the hydroelastic solution is validated against experimental measurements and reference numerical solutions for three test cases. The ship girder is approximated by an Euler–Bernoulli beam, so only elastic bending deformation is considered and sheer effects are neglected. Some controversy has long existed in the literature about the correct form of the linearized hydrostatic stiffness terms for flexible modes, with Newman (1994) and Malenica and Bigot (2020) arriving at different forms. We provide here a complete derivation of both forms (including the gravitational terms) and demonstrate the equivalence of the buoyancy terms for pure elastic motions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49879,"journal":{"name":"Marine Structures","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 103602"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951833924000303/pdfft?md5=4696b220913724a646396cc15dfe1959&pid=1-s2.0-S0951833924000303-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951833924000303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work extends an existing seakeeping tool (OceanWave3D-seakeeping) to allow for the efficient and accurate evaluation of the hydroelastic response of large flexible ships sailing in waves. OceanWave3D-seakeeping solves the linearized potential flow problem using high-order finite differences on overlapping curvilinear body-fitted grids. Generalized modes are introduced to capture the flexural responses at both zero and non-zero forward speed, but we focus on the zero speed case here. The implementation of the hydroelastic solution is validated against experimental measurements and reference numerical solutions for three test cases. The ship girder is approximated by an Euler–Bernoulli beam, so only elastic bending deformation is considered and sheer effects are neglected. Some controversy has long existed in the literature about the correct form of the linearized hydrostatic stiffness terms for flexible modes, with Newman (1994) and Malenica and Bigot (2020) arriving at different forms. We provide here a complete derivation of both forms (including the gravitational terms) and demonstrate the equivalence of the buoyancy terms for pure elastic motions.

使用重叠网格上的高阶有限差分法求解零航速下的水弹性船舶响应
这项工作扩展了现有的围堰工具(OceanWave3D-seakeeping),以便高效、准确地评估大型柔性船舶在波浪中航行时的水弹性响应。OceanWave3D-seakeeping 在重叠的曲线体拟合网格上使用高阶有限差分求解线性化势流问题。我们引入了广义模态,以捕捉零速和非零速前进时的挠曲响应,但我们在此重点讨论零速情况。根据三个测试案例的实验测量结果和参考数值解法,对水力弹性解法的实施进行了验证。船梁近似于欧拉-伯努利梁,因此只考虑弹性弯曲变形,忽略了峭壁效应。长期以来,文献中对柔性模式线性化流体静力学刚度项的正确形式存在一些争议,Newman(1994 年)和 Malenica 与 Bigot(2020 年)得出了不同的形式。我们在此提供了两种形式(包括重力项)的完整推导,并证明了浮力项对于纯弹性运动的等效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine Structures
Marine Structures 工程技术-工程:海洋
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
157
审稿时长
6.4 months
期刊介绍: This journal aims to provide a medium for presentation and discussion of the latest developments in research, design, fabrication and in-service experience relating to marine structures, i.e., all structures of steel, concrete, light alloy or composite construction having an interface with the sea, including ships, fixed and mobile offshore platforms, submarine and submersibles, pipelines, subsea systems for shallow and deep ocean operations and coastal structures such as piers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信